Before posting keep this in mind; This website is supported by user created content to keep it active.
If users (such as yourself) do not create content, you only have yourselves to blame for the lack of said content.

Subject   (new thread)
BB Code
File []
File URL
Embed   Help
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: ASS, BMP, CSS, FLAC, GIF, JPEG, JPG, MP3, OGG, PDF, PNG, PSD, RAR, SWF, TORRENT, TXT, ZIP
  • Maximum file size allowed is 10000 KB.
  • Images greater than 260x260 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 1573 unique user posts.
  • board catalog

File 162289814722.jpg - (227.61KB , 848x1200 , 1579975812903.jpg )
6803 No. 6803 hide watch quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
Will you shut down tohno chan one day? I would be sad to see it go.
>> No. 6804 [Edit]
I don't see any reason to.
>> No. 6806 [Edit]
other chans went down because the owner stopped caring, nno activity or too much spam to remove

File 158907539725.png - (755.72KB , 1443x1218 , flash.png )
6767 No. 6767 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
I don't know how much tohno and friends know about programming, so I hope this isn't an unreasonable request, but flash is super dead. Nobody uses flash anymore, most browsers either don't support it or are phasing it out(mine doesn't at all), it doesn't work on phones either, and the final nail in the coffin, adobe is killing it off too by the end of 2020. A new video embed system would be nice.
2 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 6770 [Edit]
It would be if we had anyone left who knew how to do such things.
>> No. 6801 [Edit]
File 162168009896.png - (34.47KB , 788x296 , tohno-chan swf player.png )
I am not sure I understand which player you and OP are referring to. The only Flash-based player included with Kusaba (that I'm aware of) is the one in the picture. But that shows up next to audio, not video uploads.

If you really are talking about this one, then it's simple to replace with an HTML5 Audio element. Every modern browser that doesn't support Flash does support HTML5.
>> No. 6802 [Edit]
Anyway, if I'm mistaken, then it's probably still a good idea to remove the Flash-based audio player, for all the reasons mentioned by OP.
In that case, I'd also ask you to direct me to a thread containing the broken video player/embed you guys are talking about, I cannot promise anything but I will try my best to help.

Instructions to replace the audio player:
1. Go to admin panel
2. Click "Edit Templates"
3. Start editing the index template (img_board_page.tpl)
4. Find a section that looks like this:
{if $post.file_type eq 'mp3'} old player code (11 lines) {/if}

5. Replace that with:
{if $post.file_type eq 'mp3'} <audio controls preload="metadata"><source src="{$file_path}/src/{$post.file|utf8_encode|urlencode}.mp3" type="audio/mpeg">{t}You are seeing this because your browser does not support the HTML5 Audio element.{/t}</audio> {/if}

6. Save and rebuild.
7. Repeat 3-6 for the thread template (img_thread.tpl) and upload-thread template (upl_thread.tpl)
>> No. 6805 [Edit]
The flash video player was added by another guy years ago. You can find plenty of examples of it on /mp3/. It's only broken in so much as is doesn't work on chromium without the pepper flash player. Tohno himself is technically illiterate.

Post edited on 12th Jun 2021, 11:37am

File 162164615086.png - (3.20MB , 2842x1600 , 1499743437227.png )
6800 No. 6800 hide watch quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
Good evening Tohno.
I wasn't sure where the post here or /navi/, so please pardon me if I chose the wrong board.
I was wondering if you still have the source code, for the Edit addon you have on this Kusaba imageboard. The official Kusaba site used to have lots of such addons, but it seems to be offline sadly.
Also, are you generating webm thumbnails with ffmpeg?

File 161727377232.jpg - (471.26KB , 1920x1080 , 146526096_10219700089788993_7749460139798268216_o.jpg )
6797 No. 6797 hide watch quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
love you tohno
>> No. 6798 [Edit]
What was the one last year? My memory is blanking; the last one I remember was the adblock one from 2 years past.
>> No. 6799 [Edit]
>What was the one last year?
Posts' vertical margins were increased, I think: posts were "socially distanced." Pretty clever!

File 157516510744.png - (809.55KB , 862x1200 , FE Ingrid 002.png )
6761 No. 6761 hide watch quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
I got banned and I don't know why or for what post. The Ban was only short but still, I can't think of what I could have done to get banned. Would it be possible to create a public ban log or some kind of message to be included in the ban so we know why we were banned and the post we were banned for?
>> No. 6762 [Edit]
I think it was from using the term "cap tcha" in the post. That term shouldn't be in our filter list but people have gotten banned for using it all the same. That's my guess anyway.
>> No. 6763 [Edit]
Ahh, I did use that in a post actually or I tried too.
>> No. 6782 [Edit]
File 160545936895.gif - (387.90KB , 640x462 , ezgif-4-f6c10e2b4e1d.gif )
I'll leave this here as a record of a /ns/ google thing issue.
>> No. 6796 [Edit]
File 161539847234.png - (1.06MB , 1280x720 , kano4.png )
The issue is finally resolved.

File 136626455955.jpg - (31.78KB , 500x319 , 500x1000px-LL-dd26c13a_576822-sandw_jpeg.jpg )
3787 No. 3787 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
The local moderation team's unwillingness to forcibly quiet those who are unable to take it easy has allowed those who are unable to take it easy to drive away a large fraction of this site's decent contributors. As it is currently, there are people (AKA those who are unable to take it easy) complaining in almost every thread about the thread being a shit thread. It has been expressed in the past that metacommentary should be restricted to this board, but the moderation staff is not restricting metacommentary to this board and this allows those people who willfully flaunt the local metacommentary etiquette to feel empowered to continue to whine and complain in almost every thread. You gave these people a hide function and a metacommentary board and an IRC to complain in.
I'm sure that you've noticed how much slower tohno-chan has become and this is probably part of the reason. Nobody wants to post when they know that there are a dozen "imageboard experts" poised waiting for the opportunity to abuse the poster.
People have left in droves for /ota/ because the environment here has become so unpleasant.
12 posts and 3 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 6788 [Edit]
>we don't want to see or hear about 3DPD here
It's nice that you're giving people the benefit of the doubt, but I'm not even sure if everybody agrees with something this basic: >>/so/26177 I really do suspect that the person who has an issue disagrees with the entire notion and doesn't want tc to be a place for people who prefer 2d to 3d. I have no reason to think otherwise.

>assuming the worst of each other without giving each other a fair chance.
I would give this person a chance if they talk to me and clearly express themself rather than labelling me toxic and saying I'm from wizardchan. Not once have they directly interacted with me in an open manner.

I have no problem with people talking about their loneliness and other issues. The general consensus though is that actually pursuing a romantic relationship isn't worth it and it's better to focus on other things. I may be wrong about that, but it's up to you to decide that. A person has a moment of weakness or a bad day or they feel bad all of the time and they come talk about it on tc. Then what? What do you want to happen after that? Do you want people to give advice? What type of advice would you like to see be given here?
>> No. 6789 [Edit]
>The general consensus though is that actually pursuing a romantic relationship isn't worth it and it's better to focus on other things.
That's your personal opinion, nothing more. You're not acting on behalf of the rest of us when you dump your righteous tirades on anyone who isn't literally you.

>Not once have they directly interacted with me in an open manner.
Of course I don't want to interact with you. Someone who in their own words considers objectors to their imaginary rules "fucking brainless cattle" is not worth talking to. Judging by the posts you linked you have a problem with no one wanting to interact with you even outside of TC.
>> No. 6790 [Edit]
>That's your personal opinion, nothing more.
Very funny line. It's also the opinion of this person >>/so/26180 and this person >>/so/26181 I can't link to every instance of it, but I think it's also the opinion of a sizable number of other people here. Of course you like to paint it as just people from wizardchan or "crabs", etc. My way of expressing this opinion is just more direct. Really it's up to tohno to decide which attitude fits tc better. TC is for a specific demographic after all. What is your attitude again? You've been very coy and indirect about it.

>considers objectors to their imaginary rules "fucking brainless cattle"
I wasn't referring to any anon when I made that comment and you seem to have misconstrued it. Yes I do look down on normal people and their mindset, another typical opinion on tc. To quote tohno himself >>/ot/32508

>When this anon went to the irc to ask what we consider to be normalfags, I said that I consider it a state of mind, a way of thinking, not a checklist of accomplishments or lack there of. That to be a normalfag is to mindlessly conform to the standards and way of life of your peers, regardless of who those peers might be. Be it a gang member or a suburban house wife, to follow the herd like some zombie incapable of individuality let alone independent thought is what makes one a normalfag. For these people it's about finding a herd to fit in with, that they might identify with, not to be confused with trying to find people who might think the way you do.

Herd, mindless, incapable of independent thought. Hmm, sounds a lot like "fucking brainless cattle". I've had the same opinions I do now since before I started posting here.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 6791 [Edit]
Forgive me for barging in, but it seems the issue stated point-blank is whether discussion of personal, romantic relationships with 3D should be allowed on /so/ and to what extent. There's been an increasing number of threads on /so/ that have been getting derailed by such conversation (and meta-conversation).

Given the assertion from >>6789 that

>That's your personal opinion, nothing more.
It seems to me that his side of the issue is that these should be allowed (do correct me if I misinterpret your position).

I'm of the position that such discussion should not be permitted in any form (e.g. hypothetical, anecdotal, etc.), for several reasons:
1) It wholly contradicts the spirit of the site
2) There's endless avenues on the internet to discuss such things. Why do you need another place for it?
3) Even if it's allowed in a "constrained" manner at first (e.g. discussion of "past" experiences), it opens the floodgates for digressions, flame-wars, and will over time dilute the rest of the board. Refer again to point (1).

While I will asusme good faith from >>6789, if I have misconstrued your position please be direct about it. It's hard to infer exactly what you're suggesting the nature of /so/ should be.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

File 159452402865.jpg - (177.39KB , 850x1411 , sample_26d46296ca7e074448ce31b293868675.jpg )
6778 No. 6778 hide watch quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
This thread is infested with pictures of 3d people. Please have it cleaned.

Post edited on 11th Jul 2020, 8:21pm

File 159336263311.png - (2.76KB , 897x18 , error.png )
6776 No. 6776 hide watch quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
Hallo, as indicated by the image, there's an error in the 12th rule item: 'loose' should be 'lose'.

File 159302006737.jpg - (62.50KB , 600x373 , nanbaka.jpg )
6775 No. 6775 hide watch quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
Post in this thread every time you're successfully evading and active ban


File 159201042663.png - (277.32KB , 1815x841 , IMG_0860.png )
6772 No. 6772 hide watch quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
Around three days ago, I was banned for linking to an image of a 3d person which I labeled as being of a 3d person. The rules page states that linking to images of 3d people is not allowed and that the board rules and irc rules are the same. It's not explicitly written that posting videos of 3d people is prohibited, but there's no reason to assume that it is allowed considering that videos of 3d people contain the same imagery. On the irc, I know people are allowed to post 3d media if they label it as such. If the irc rules actually are different, that should be clearly written, even if clearly stating so is uncomfortable for whatever reason, because otherwise it may be confusing to people who have used both.

In the Corona thread, there are still posts which link to news articles with pictures of 3d people right as they are opened. Here they are for reference. >>/ot/34278 >>/ot/34664 The second post in particular, includes a link which still has 3d people in it after being warned, just wearing masks, which there's no reason to think would be allowed. Their post also mentioned wanting to kill all Chinese people, yet while they only got a warning, I was banned for something which would be allowed on the irc. In /mp3/ quite a few posts probably link to 3d media. This one has been around for 2 years. >>/mp3/2503 The ban page also includes 3d media, just for the sake of taunting people I guess.

All of this sends a very mixed signal. Please provide an explanation in plain english because I really can't understand it.

Post edited on 12th Jun 2020, 7:59pm
>> No. 6773 [Edit]
Talked it over with one of our mods. Sorry about that. They just wanted to be more strict about the no 3DPD stuff, which I can't say I blame them for. I've thought about deleting some of the hidden boards that might attract that stuff just to double down and be clear cut about it. We did come to an agreement though, that users are big boys who can handle themselves, If someone wants to follow random links, they do so at their own risk. Any 3dpd content behind external links isn't our problem, but linking to such things IS discouraged. Do it too much and we'll ban/delete as need be.

File 156105467277.png - (255.75KB , 512x384 , epic meme.png )
6759 No. 6759 hide watch quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
how come this board is dead?
>> No. 6760 [Edit]
It was removed for awhile.

View catalog

Delete post []
Report post
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]

[Home] [Manage]

[ Rules ] [ an / foe / ma / mp3 / vg / vn ] [ cr / fig / navi ] [ mai / ot / so / tat ] [ arc / ddl / irc / lol / ns / pic ] [ home ]