I apologize for the spam filter triggering and banning. Your ban has been removed.

Here's the original post for Tohno:

>>/so/28917 is https://cdn.donmai.us/original/77/10/__oshino_ougi_monogatari__7710970264d3b57276becd16ba73fc31.jpg (found via ordering posts by md5: https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=order%3Amd5+oshino_ougi) >>/so/28933 is still missing https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GKjBgUya0AA4O4S.jpg:large jaypee post No. 2 is missing https://img3.gelbooru.com/images/3c/c0/3cc09769e923e200140f4d26b76031f6.jpg

>>/navi/3396 is missing, seems to be pixiv
>>/navi/3395 is missing, can be looked up by md5

>>6918
I posted >>/so/28904 the artist deletes her art often so you can't look it up using this method >>6921
I can't prove it but it has the same resolution

>https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/7248357
>https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=bullfalk
Fun fact
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Milkmaid_(Vermeer)

http://tohno-chan.com/so/res/28910.html op pic

Not tohno but I think embeds are probably just broken, I've basically never seen them used. And just posting a direct link is probably more friendly for those consuming on text-based readers.

Yes tohno, ehh, yeah it does seem to be busted. Sorry for the trouble.

>>6910
Think it's a reasonable code issue or the result of the modern state of youtube?

>>6902
Done. I can increase it more, if it still seems too small.

Post edited on 27th Jun 2023, 12:36pm

>>6903
Thanks. Looks good to me.

Hopefully it's better now.

That was really weird. I became able to reply and was just about to post here to inform that, when I realized something was wrong. The posts didn't show up on the homepage and the chidori file was still inaccessible. But I could still access the thread and see the reply box, so I decided to go to /mp3/ and actually post there first to see if the reply would go through. Then i see the post is also gone from the homepage and the thread is no longer accessible. The same issues from the op persist. Wait, now it's gone. The threads are gone, but I can still access and listen to the alabaster track.

Post edited on 25th Mar 2023, 12:30pm

>>6897
I suppose I should explain.
The OP of the koto thread deleted his own thread, but because of the board software and its funny bugs, the board index wasn't updated, thus a ghost thread was born. These kind of threads usually disappear when another thread is bumped. Then Tohno used some kind of black magic and resurrected the thread, but the audio file was broken nevertheless. He also made a test thread with alabaster song. Then he deleted both threads, but the bug made its appeareance again. I highly suspect the reason why you can still access the alabaster track is your browser's cache.

>>6898
Mystery solved.

>>6827
>As an imageboard community we can stop this shit
What shit? Out of the 3 niche imageboards I visit, none have ever had any problem other than the usual link spam. Exactly what problem would be solved by this (other than increasing Cloudflare's market cap)?

>>6828
If you don't know you're either new, or one of the spammers posting unmentionable things.

>>6886
Given that you're trying to advocate for the global mitm that is cloudflare, I'd say you're the one who's new. There are plenty of ways to deter posters that don't rely on glowie software.

And another bug: the below text supposedly trips Kusaba's word-filter based autoban (text below rot13'd to itself avoid tripping it):

>fperrapnc V pna

I'm assuming it's a badly written regex matching on it. If one of the mods has access to the wordfilter list and can whip up a script to test against it, should be able to identify it pretty easily.

Post edited on 23rd Nov 2022, 8:54pm

>>6881
It should be fixed now.

>>6882
Neat. I'm curious what the offending regex/wordfilter was, if you don't mind sharing?

>>6883
I can only tell that it involved 5 characters.

May I ask why my response to thread >>/so/27714 was deleted? I do realize that the comment I made was a meta-comment so might technically be considered off-topic, however the point remains as it stands the thread doesn't offer much from the other identical copy-pasted threads [1]. My comment was not meant as a criticism against the OP (his motives could well be genuine) but rather a suggestion that instead of dumping links a specific topic for discussion should be formulated.

[1] https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/subject/Vast%20majority%20of%20people%20cheat%20on%20their%20partners/

>>6872
I looked into it and it seems like the OP himself deleted the thread and remade it.

>>6873
Thank you for investigating, I apologize for mistakenly attributing it to the mods.

>>6873
I also decided to move the thread to >>/tat/1539.

>>6864
I don't know if it's supposed to be this way or not, but the girl from the pink background shows through posted pictures when clicked.

>>6865
I don't know if it's intentional, but the cause seems to be the !important on background-image of body.

While I"m reporting css things, can you do

.tablesub {
background-size: auto 200%;
}

.tabletop2 {
background-size: auto 200%;
}

to fix the issue in attached image? Note that for some reason the the image http://tohno-chan.com/images/themes/submenubgv2.png has a weird crease in the middle half, so we need to set the height as 200% in order for it to correctly work.

>>6870
Fixed, thanks.

This is known problem. See >>6852.

For yet unknown reasons, sometimes threads aren't regenerated when posting. For workaround, posting in the same thread again should make your post appear.

Post edited on 25th Jul 2022, 7:23am

>>6856
I looked throught the fb catalog to see if someone reported it but didn't realize an anon would reuse a thread unrelated to it, very parsimonious on his part. It's there now. Thanks for your help.

It's happening more often now, almost every post in /ot/

>>2961

and I think ur a faget.

But in all seriousness: in most cases, an actual good contribution won't get met with insults and degrading posts. While there may be an occasional good contribution that gets hit with a reddit style 'fuck you and your logic die in flame', those general type topics are already listed and noted and it's 10,000% more likely that the person posting is trolling than actually contributing.

Re-using this thread to comment on >>/ot/39952

I've noticed the pattern of two people engaging in flamewars keeps recurring on /ot/ (in fact the last thread "things that piss you off" thread also got locked because of it). I'm confident the mods have things things under control, but perhaps a rule suggesting that 1:1 flame-warring be moved to /tat/ or something of the like might be useful in gently deterring non-constructive dialogues? Although I guess rule 11 pretty much already covers this by suggesting that users avoid engaging in deliberate 1:1 baiting.

>>6849
Pretty sure in most of these recent engagements, one of the guys involved is always the same one.

>>6849
I feel like changing the rules wouldn't really stop that from happening. When those things get out of hand it tends to end with someone getting banned anyway.

>>1419
I don't think you understood my post, as I agree with you completely that Tohno-chan isn't any place for 3d. But it isn't about 3d, it is about avoiding becoming entrapped in a culture that stagnates thought, it goes beyond 3d and is applicable to many different topics.

This seems like the most relevant existing thread I could find to discuss what tohno mentioned in >>/so/27545

My personal opinion is that there's no real shortage of places online to vent or complain about 3D relationships, so I don't see the need to create another one. There's limited upside (I'd imagine that a large fraction of the userbase would not really benefit from it), but large downside (one of the appeals of TC for me is that it's the one place where I don't have to deal with people talking about or posting pictures of 3D. While I won't be so presumptuous as to say I'd stop using TC if these rules were loosened, it would nonetheless make me visit less frequently if the volume of those posts began to increase).

If one wishes to express the emotions (hopelessness, anguish, etc.) that the OP of the post in question feels, they can still do so while adhering to this guideline by expressing the feelings in a manner that's divorced from 3D context. I feel this also makes for better writing anyhow, since it forces you to abstract, allowing people to better empathize.

To give an example (and possibly commit what some consider a grave social faux pas), the OP of the post in question could have simply elided the details
>I used to clean his ears just like Senko, he would lay on my lap. I'd cook him jap curry. I made him cute work lunches.
and it would have already been orders of magnitude better. As it stands, these are just extraneous details that no one outside of the author in question can relate to, and merely cheapen the expression of whatever (genuine) sentiments the OP might feel.

Post edited on 22nd Jun 2022, 9:00pm

>>6843
You're right, there are a lot of other places for it, and pretty much none that avoid/forbid it. I guess I liked the idea of being more supportive and helping to people in need, but in thinking about it, it could very easily also set a bad example and lead to some rather nasty things no one wants to see here.
I feel sorry for people like that, and I guess my sense of compassion makes me want to help them, but yeah the truth is this really just isn't the place for that.

>>6843
>>6844
Not that I have any say in the matter but I agree. Not only it's an unique aspect of tc that shapes the atmosphere of this place in a good way, but also conversations about 3D romantic relationships tend to become antagonistic incredibly fast. I think it's quite obvious that one was already going downhill.

>I feel sorry for people like that, and I guess my sense of compassion makes me want to help them
I suppose not allowing it actually helps those people more than allowing it, since you can escape those problems by coming to a 3Dfree zone.