Likely for this reason:
>Do not create threads that already exist. Use the catalog to look for a thread related to what you're looking.

From >>/r/15

Post edited on 17th Jun 2022, 8:39am

i think its fine when the threads are over three years old

>>6839
But why create a new thread instead of posting in the old one? That way conversation can reference previous posts as well.

>>6840
one of the threads i made wasn't already under the compass of another

>>6841
If I recall correctly, you made an animal thread and the one where you asked how people found tohno-chan.

Threads about such subjects can be found in >>/ot/28802 and >>/ot/36754, respectively.

>>6842
i also made a thread with a picture of a pie as the OP saying what things have you done while manic/sad

>>6847
Interesting. I don't recall seeing that thread. I can't even find any records of it from the logs.

May I ask why my response to thread >>/so/27714 was deleted? I do realize that the comment I made was a meta-comment so might technically be considered off-topic, however the point remains as it stands the thread doesn't offer much from the other identical copy-pasted threads [1]. My comment was not meant as a criticism against the OP (his motives could well be genuine) but rather a suggestion that instead of dumping links a specific topic for discussion should be formulated.

[1] https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/subject/Vast%20majority%20of%20people%20cheat%20on%20their%20partners/

>>6872
I looked into it and it seems like the OP himself deleted the thread and remade it.

>>6873
Thank you for investigating, I apologize for mistakenly attributing it to the mods.

>>6873
I also decided to move the thread to >>/tat/1539.