For discussion of politics, religion, and other content not fitting the rest of the site
Name
Email
Subject   (new thread)
Message
BB Code
File
File URL
Embed   Help
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PDF, PNG, TXT
  • Maximum file size allowed is 11742 KB.
  • Images greater than 260x260 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 426 unique user posts.
  • board catalog

File 151107707276.png - (135.20KB , 349x333 , 1080240_1342802474977_full.png )
376 No. 376 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
lets say there was a nation of otaku, the whole country populated exclusively by people who were only interested in anime, manga, and related games, merchandise and unauthorized pornagraphy, etc.
if a whole bunch of people who weren't otaku announced that they wanted to immigrate to otakuland and not adopt the local culture, but to try and change the otakuland culture so that it more closely resembles the place the immigrants originated from, do you think that the otakulanders should welcome the immigrants with open arms or do you think that they should try to keep the immigrants out?
5 posts and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 387 [Edit]
File 151131049083.png - (3.01MB , 1768x2548 , 1490646148023.png )
387
>>386
Japan's birth rate is up over the past decade.
>> No. 394 [Edit]
>>385
And it's not going to die. They don't need to breed to be; though some benefit from people believing this myth. If anything it's good because populations need to start shrinking dramatically.
Desperately throwing more and more bodies onto the pyres of glorious market won't work forever. It's killing humanity, what irony.
Even if people are considered disposable and free (as in "free beer") space and resources are not unlimited. But this barbarian economy keeps the rich and powerful in control so nothing will ever change. Even if it means misery for billions and eventually extinction for all they'll keep us living like yeast, trapped in futile cycle of consumption and multiplication until there's no more sugar left, only a deadly amount of alcohol.

Immigration is exploited to prolong this suffering. Immigrants are used to fuck up locals and break up homogenous nations into more manageable melange, they also provide dirt cheap slave-fuel needed to keep the machine going unchanged. They're strikebreakers.
>> No. 408 [Edit]
ALLAHU AKBAR GRAVEN IMAGES ARE HARAM

*throws acid on your dakimakura and rapes it*
>> No. 410 [Edit]
>>394
Pretty much on-point. Though I doubt the extinction part, even the Black Plague couldn't finish us off (in fact made life better after-wards due to culling of people raised an individual's worth).

And there's the paradox stated by pro-immigrants: 1) they'll do the jobs we won't want to do, 2) they aren't stealing your jobs, you're being a fear-monger.


Funnily, I learnt first-hand how mass-immigration just pushes you down a class, to make room, from when they moved the Koreans and Taiwanese to the Global Love Live SIF.
Before they came I would often get two SR with average effort (from events), now I don't even get one.

File 151213952892.jpg - (2.18KB , 125x70 , 1452440081346s.jpg )
400 No. 400 hide watch quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
'OSS (Office of Strategic Services) also helped arm, train and supply resistance movements, including Mao Zedong's People's Liberation Army in China and the Viet Minh in French Indochina, in areas occupied by the Axis powers. Other functions of the OSS included the use of propaganda, espionage, subversion, and post-war planning.'

Wow, the USA's 'fund a terrorist group, what could possibly go wrong' plan has been going on since the 1940s.
>> No. 401 [Edit]
So, uh, what's there to debate? What's your question.
>"what could possibly go wrong"
Always a charade.

File 150898801115.gif - (3.46MB , 320x176 , shut-up-and-take-my-money-level-anime_o_742644.gif )
364 No. 364 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
I don't understand. How is Mexico still so piss poor after all this time? They've been sending swarms of Mexicans to the US for decades to collect money and resources, who then send those resources and money back to their families in mexico? Anyone who's lived around them would know how much of a drain they are on the American economy. They spend as little as they can here so they can send to Mexico everything they can. They're content to live in squarer or pack themselves into small homes like sardines just to save a few bucks to send to Mexico. The question is though, where is that money? Are corrupt police, politicians, and drug lords really sucking it all up or is there more to it?
4 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 396 [Edit]
>>383
It's not that different in Mexico than in other subject countries. I live in a Mexico-like slave reservoir.
Nothing can be done about it. They make too little money to really change anything back home and the master country is happy to have legal slaves.
They're not smart with that money sent from America and most waste it on distractions from horrible poorfag life. Everything goes back into pockets of businessmen, politicians and crime lords.
Even if they started being frugal and cautious they'd get robbed anyway. That's what happened here. Too many people were saving almost meaningful amounts money. Can't have that, the governments took steps to rectify the problem and increased taxes, working ages, took care to maintain that steady inflation to keep the money in the business and out of people's pockets. The usual stuff.
Now it's all clear: you'll be slaving for us until you die anyway so don't even bother trying to hoard OUR money. Go get a loan, buy a TV and get fucked on drugs every friday.
If you study in one of the trending fields maybe you'll achieve the status of winning at life by being able to afford bigger loans for bigger TVs and more extravagant drugs.

Where does the money go? It's a cliched thing to say but top 100 of the wealthiest people of the world have enough money to buy out 4 billion of the poorest. Less than 100 million owns more than the rest, 7.5 billion. The world is a fucking farm.
>> No. 397 [Edit]
>>396
Hoarding money is bad for the economy. If everbody starts hoarding money, then there's no money in the economy, then business can't pay wages, then government would have to print more, then the money becomes weaker meaning the people who saved haven't achieved anything.

It's easy to say the rich are greedy, but the poor aren't entirely blameless. They're too cowardly to do anything about their shitty situation, and too greedy themselves and only care about their own well-being.
If you gave those slum fuckers a billion dollars, they'd become exactly the elite rich that once subjected them.

It's not the mode of economics, it's the culture of the people.
>> No. 398 [Edit]
>>397
No one hoards more money than the wealthy elite. I think you missed the part where the anon said >100 of the wealthiest people of the world have enough money to buy out 4 billion of the poorest.
Some people trying to fill up their water bottles is nothing compared to just one person with their own privet lake. Those few wealthy fucks are what's killing the economy.
Money isn't printed because of people hoarding money, You can thank wealthy bankers for that and making our money worthless thanks to the money they create out of thin air. You know there's more debt in this world than there is money to pay it off? Up until not that long ago, money was backed by real solid precious metals. You couldn't just print off more money when money was just a stand in for the gold it represented, gold you could trade that money in for. Once that gold standard was removed, that's when money became worthless, because there was nothing backing it.

>If you gave those slum fuckers a billion dollars, they'd become exactly the elite rich that once subjected them.
Yeah, no. Most would eventually go back to living the same way that lead them where they are. People who are bad with money don't stop being bad with money just because you give them more money. I've seen people sue their way into tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars just to quickly burn it up on stupid shit and invest next to none of it. I've spent a lot of time at casinos and watched countless strangers manage to win only to keep gambling and piss it all away or walk out empty handed after going in with stacks of bills. Go watch the beverly hillbillies sometime, you might find it educational.
>> No. 399 [Edit]
>>398
We don't have that problem of super rich elite in Europe and Australia, so not my problem.
USA was founded by a bunch of rich people who didn't want to pay taxes to Crown (which payed to defend them from France), so, again, it's the culture of the people.

I wasn't talking how they'd end up poor. I was saying that those poor people, given wealth, would become the rich elite they once despised when they were poor. Nouveau Riche
There is no greater good for those sub-humans, only personal gain. A product of an inferior culture not yet exterminated.

File 150962924518.jpg - (511.26KB , 600x800 , 1433309200339.jpg )
368 No. 368 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
Have you noticed that when a guy is part of a leftist, multiculti, save the immigrants type group, there just happens to be a female involved.
1 post omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 370 [Edit]
File 150966878970.jpg - (112.83KB , 600x541 , e3988fa3bb6125f77b8e55d648ab1aebdd317bc7.jpg )
370
So that explains the term "SJW cuck" then.
For all the complaining people like to do about such people I haven't actually ever met anyone in real life who is like that.
I have only ever met one person who does that and that is a family member of mine. They don't try to make me think the way they do very often though.
Are they truly so common? Maybe they just aren't around where I live in the country?
>> No. 371 [Edit]
File 150968735069.jpg - (138.14KB , 595x842 , C_S9NIRU0AAHglH.jpg )
371
>>370
I think (or maybe hope) it's vocal minority type of thing. Though there are some places where these types of ideas thrive such as West coast USA.
>> No. 372 [Edit]
File 150970175312.png - (299.44KB , 591x333 , sk.png )
372
>>369
But is that even your own idea, or something Stirner told you?
https://youtu.be/vXbCWJNfq_0

https://youtu.be/eKl6WjfDqYA


>>370
I had been seeing it for awhile, but didn't really take notice until I watched a documentary and they were interviewing some leftist who houses refugees and some broad was at his side. His demeanor was typical of a normie who is rejected by normies.
>> No. 384 [Edit]
Absolutely. For as long as I can remember every time I see a SJW, male feminist, or whatever, I just assume they're whipped.

File 144816727064.jpg - (92.89KB , 500x354 , f867112b0f324f23c6c550501b2291b6.jpg )
262 No. 262 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
Who here is racist? Against which race(s), and why? Was there any particular event which turned you into a racist?
36 posts and 4 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 345 [Edit]
Since I live in Europe I hold a huge disdain against Muslims and Blacks because they're savage rapists and murderers. Specially Muslims. They really should be removed.
>> No. 362 [Edit]
File 150736973143.png - (134.92KB , 331x547 , WiseChineseMilitaryMen.png )
362
I hate the Chinese so god-damned much. They are like Jews if you minus the intelligence and add billions (literally) of bodies.

They are also VERY ethno-nationlists, if you are not Chinese you are inferior (the irony is so many of them LEAVE CHINA because it is a shit-hole). Even if you are Chinese, if you are not rich, you are still inferior; all they care about is money and ethnicity.

I mean, this is a country so devoid of morals that they HARVEST ORGANS of their own god-damned people, and then cry about supposed Japanese war-crimes against them.
ANYTHING they do is to gain money or ehtnic superiority, they do not actually care about any sort of morals or politics or.

Suffice to say, I want them out of my country.
Places without mass Chinese immigrants think of them as hard workers, sure, they are, but they would sell your fucking liver if it was legal. They abide by the law out of fear of losing money, not any sort of moral grounds.
>> No. 367 [Edit]
I'm not racist in the sense of being a shittier person to certain races IRL or even having an emotional attachment or hatred with one race or another. But I am racist in the sense of being on the pro-racial side of the biological argument. Based on the scientific articles that I've read, I have become racist.
Usually, when a scientist or scientific journalist writes that race is an illegitimate idea or that races are not different mentally, they use little to no data and throw some bullshit sophistry at you, like "Intelligence and crime are caused by socioeconomic and cultural factors." when almost every adoption study from the past 30 years disproves this. They also love the argument from concensus, even though most scientists outside of the ideologically influenced West and ego-preserving brown person-populated countries, like scientists from China or Russia generally agree on racial differences.

http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/
>> No. 857 [Edit]
>>362
Even among "second generation" Chinese born in the US, I've still felt the vestigial lack of sympathy. They have no qualms taking advantage of others, and this behavior particularly emerges when they form their own cliques.

Relatedly, It's shocking to me how universities and companies in the United States welcome Chinese immigrants by the boatload (no doubt lured in by their money), when it's well-established that a majority of these people are sent by the PRC to spy and transfer intelligence/knowledge back.

File 150885623535.jpg - (308.24KB , 1200x869 , Beijing_Castle_Boxer_Rebellion_1900_FINAL.jpg )
363 No. 363 hide watch quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
I can't wait for war with China. Those fuckers have been getting too cocky.
They'll learn their rightful place as national inferiors soon enough.

File 150485736425.jpg - (631.01KB , 1836x1256 , John_Singleton_Copley_001.jpg )
342 No. 342 hide watch quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
'We would not say anything if the U.S.A. were aware of its intellectual and moral defects and was trying to grow up. But it is too much when it behaves in an impudent manner toward a part of the earth with a few thousands years of glorious history behind it, attempting to teach it moral and intellectual lessons, whether out of innocence or a complete lack of genuine culture and learning. We can forgive the mistakes of youth, but this degree of arrogance gets on one’s nerves.

We therefore have no appreciation for the Americanism that can be found in certain of our circles. We fail to see why we as the leading musical nation in the world should borrow even a single note from the U.S.A. We have a level of culture and civilization that is denied to most Americans. One who understands this can hardly have much sympathy for what they understand as culture and civilization. Although we affirm the technical achievements of our age, we see behind them an intellectual strength that grows from the roots of our people. Machines are a means to an end, not an end in themselves. As much as we appreciate the achievements of modern civilization and use them to improve life, we know that they are not the sole meaning of life. There are national values that are the result of centuries of history and tradition. They cannot be purchased, only built by the labor of generations.'
>> No. 344 [Edit]
Condense it into one sentence, or explain your point without copy-pasting.

File 146033725948.jpg - (114.92KB , 1280x720 , [Commie] Teekyuu - 78 [C808B8C4]_mkv_snapshot_00_0.jpg )
30 No. 30 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
What's your stance on abortion?
2 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 33 [Edit]
In my opinion, abortion should be law for prostitutes.

I've seen a couple of sad things thus far in life but nothing compares to the sight of a crackhead prostitute with a ballon-belly.

It's like i can predict, feel the suffering and pain of this chis child, even before being born.
>> No. 40 [Edit]
Glad it exists. Those who abort don't want their child. If they couldn't abort that child most likely wouldn't have a good life. Also there would be even more humans on earth. I don't agree with it being murder since it isn't a person yet.

Of course those children who aren't wanted would probably like to stay alive once they have a life, same with the disabled, they want to stay alive because that's the only chance they got regardless of how bad it is but the possible future doesn't really matter in my opinion, a fetus doesn't know what it'll lose if it gets aborted and we don't have any obligations to a thing with the potential of becoming a person, if we had, we'd be pretty fucked because we would have obligations to our sperm and we'd be killing a fuck ton of potential persons by not impregnating a woman every minute.

My mother didn't want me either by the way. She just has a moral problem with abortion.
>> No. 333 [Edit]
Cult of Moloch, keeping their child-sacrifice rituals alive and well in [current year]
>> No. 509 [Edit]
Legal, mandatory for handicapped fetuses or signs of (hereditary, chronic, ...) illness.

File 149649185362.jpg - (105.40KB , 960x1248 , 1453721295848.jpg )
242 No. 242 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Policemen
>refers to a post-war council consisting of the Big Four that U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed as a guarantor of world peace. The members of the Big Four, called the Four Powers during World War II, were the four major Allies of World War II: the United Kingdom, the United States, the Soviet Union and the Republic of China
>As a preventive measure against new wars, countries other than the Four Policemen were to be disarmed. Only the Four Policemen would be allowed to possess any weapons more powerful than a rifle.[2]

'Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.'
- Benjamin Franklin


'In America everybody is of opinion that he has no social superiors, since all men are equal, but he does not admit that he has no social inferiors, for, from the time of Jefferson onward, the doctrine that all men are equal applies only upwards, not downwards.'
- Bertrand Russell
1 post and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 245 [Edit]
>>244
The US Constitution only applies to US citizens.
>> No. 246 [Edit]
File 149650510151.jpg - (47.09KB , 442x353 , 1412680203479.jpg )
246
>The US Constitution only applies to US citizens.
Second paragraph of the United States Declaration of Independence:
'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed;[7]
>> No. 247 [Edit]
File 149650605785.png - (267.25KB , 596x761 , CBRtmC_UwAAy1T7.png )
247
>>246
>That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among men, deriving their powers from the consent of the governed.

Citizens of foreign nations didn't consent to US rule. Maybe in some exceptions, don't nitpick me.
>> No. 248 [Edit]
>>246
The Declaration of Independence is different from the Constitution. The Constitution is an agreement between the Federal Government and the people. Even state governments aren't held to the Constitution in the same way that the Feds are. The point of the document was to establish the Union out of the then independent colonies.

I agree with your point that the very notion of such a thing as the Four Policemen is very hypocritical, but it does need to be said regardless.

Post edited on 3rd Jun 2017, 10:29am

File 149049484749.png - (77.82KB , 375x444 , 1489133474996.png )
125 No. 125 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
If this board is to be "like /pol/", we absolutely must have a thread about Jews.

What do you think about Jews? Is the extent of their wealth and control over media troubling to you? Do you think they're actually behind the promotion of things like miscegenation and a poor education system (ie: Common Core) to keep the population at large easier to control, or do you think that's just a Stormfront conspiracy theory?

Post edited on 25th Mar 2017, 7:23pm
4 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 224 [Edit]
>>223
The problem with that is, given the option most Jews who are in-touch with their cultural identity would identify as Zionist. They need to love Israel. It's definitely a pride thing, if they don't love it it isn't worth the conflict.

I'm obviously the outsider here, but I have very few issues with Jews, even if they have nationalistic tendencies. I do have a bit of an issue with the so-called holocaust exploitation but that seems to have died down.

I don't expect to convince people that there are far bigger problems and it's weird to blame an ethnic group for the flaws in a flawed world, but it bothers me because it prevents people from recognizing the real causes behind the problem.

I see hatred of Jews as a reaction by people who desperately need a cause behind things that clash with their worldview. When you can't get a job, blame the Jews for ruining our economy. When you see our culture disintegrating, it's gotta be those damn Jews. When a child is murdered (that's an old one) or war breaks out why not blame the Jews? "They're insular and judgmental, and surely nobody in our wonderful righteous community could commit such acts without being manipulated by these beasts!" It's a tale as old as time but I personally think Jews are pretty low on the list of things to be worried about or angry at. I'd even go as far to say they've been scapegoats for people in positions of power until relatively recently. I think it's fucked, but I can't convince people who are simply not able to be convinced and would stop at nothing to prove me wrong.

Basically, I can't condone Jew hatred when it's been a dubious worldview appealing to some of the most base, violent and idiotic aspects of man for the sake of diverting attention from some very questionable acts by people in power for centuries.
>> No. 225 [Edit]
>>224
'The scapegoat was a goat that was designated (Hebrew לַעֲזָאזֵֽל ) la-aza'zeyl; "for absolute removal", (for symbolic removal of the people's sins with the literal removal of the goat) and outcast in the desert as part of the ceremonies of the Day of Atonement, that began during the Exodus with the original Tabernacle and continued through the times of the temples in Jerusalem.'
>> No. 226 [Edit]
File
Removed
I used to hold the belief that these "conspiracies" aren't as malicious as people think them to be. I thought that yes there were kikes behind everything, but not because they're Marvel super villains that rub their hands together and cackle with evil glee while they wreak havoc among the white man and pit their puppets against each other. I thought they were organic. Jews have the highest IQ in the world. That's why they're at the top, nothing more. And their dastardly deeds were an inevitability that would have been proposed by the next highest IQ on the totem pole if not them.
Really, even IQ aside, if you put a group of men in control of something--no, even without direct control over anything specific, just men hanging out in a room together talking, that group will form power dynamics and there will always be someone above the rest and one of the men will have the short end of the stick. That's just the way things are. I thought that this simple concept perfectly explained Jews and that there was nothing particularly sinister about it, only humanity at work.

But later I learned that they are indeed Marvel super villains. Quotes like this pic attached and people like the Rothschild family and George Soros convinced me of that.

Post edited on 28th May 2017, 1:13am

Please refrain from posting 3D images.
>> No. 234 [Edit]
File 149598504350.png - (2.60MB , 1586x1586 , jew explains.png )
234
>>226
Apologies, here's the quote but with the man's head removed.

batman villain IRL

File 149483568098.jpg - (1.17MB , 1289x1402 , ba2334e36739fb7eef642130cfeee830.jpg )
183 No. 183 hide watch expand quickreply [Reply] [Edit]
Here's a controversial topic that hasn't been discussed yet. What are your thoughts on private gun ownership? Do you support or oppose it?
20 posts and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No. 209 [Edit]
>>204
>You don't go for freedom because it's easy.
Freedom is very easy. Go into the woods, uncontrolled by the opressive government.
You will get a disease and die, that is freedom.

>If it is, then so is enjoying 'stability' and 'order'
Stability and order bring harmony of society. That is the opposite of fear. There is no fear, to the point of boredom, but that can be remedied.

>Though I'd add that any country that calls itself free should be doing the same thing of their governments
America probably the worst of the developed nations. Without its money, America would look as if though it is only a developing nation.
>It's a lot of power to blindly trust to be used for the good of the people
Power always finds a place to rest it's head. Government is not a omnipotent being, who props up instantaniously simply to spoil a good time. Government is formed through thousands of years of bloodshed and primitve savagery, then those who are the strongest and most benevolent will gather a following larger, and that group will be called 'government'.

>It was generally held in British Common Law in the colonies prior to the Revolutionary War that there was a right to keep and to bear arms
Very unfortunate for them, then. After having defended America from French colonisation, their own citizens attack them.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No. 211 [Edit]
>>209
Now the 'fear' of a government taking the country to its demise is 'hatred'... just not in the case of the USA? Don't devolve into semantics.

>There is no living in perputual fear of his government, as in the USA.
But this isn't really the case. It's a strawman you conceived out of someone making the argument that guns can be used as a system of checks and balances against a theoretical tyrannical government. Nobody except the most insane SJW, who wouldn't touch a gun in the first place, has any serious fear of military action of the government on its citizens in the US.

Your arguments seem vested in personal, emotional dislike (especially with use of subjective adjectives like 'worst' and 'trash') of the US rather than rational observation.
>> No. 212 [Edit]
>>211
>rather than rational observation.
I used to be pro-American, so I have knowledge from both sides.
>> No. 219 [Edit]
>>183
If I were to run a country, I'd make it the following way:
-there are gun ranges where you can go and fire guns just for fun, sport and leisure, just about anyone can open one and anyone can play with anything in those ranges: automatic guns, explosives, artillery etc.
-you can own guns for self defense at your home and carry them around your home freely, but there would be some restrictions such as no automatics, no explosives, magazine and caliber size etc
-people who have gone through vigorous checks, tests etc can conceal carry for self defense in public
Anyone with strong mental disabilities, criminal backgrounds or substance addictions would be automatically excluded from any gun ownership.
Other regulations or deregulations would be up to the congress, parliament or whatever equivalent of said country to debate and implement.

View catalog

Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason  
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4]


[Home] [Manage]



[ Rules ] [ an / foe / ma / mp3 / vg / vn ] [ cr / fig / navi ] [ mai / ot / so / tat ] [ arc / ddl / irc / lol / ns / pic ] [ home ]