This is a board for topics that don't fit on other boards, but that are still otaku/hobby related.
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject   (reply to 16448)
Message
BB Code
File
File URL
Embed   Help
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: BMP, EPUB, GIF, JPEG, JPG, MP3, MP4, OGG, PDF, PNG, PSD, SWF, TORRENT, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 10000 KB.
  • Images greater than 260x260 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 4754 unique user posts.
  • board catalog

File 134575630513.jpg - (64.06KB , 336x447 , ponderings.jpg )
16448 No. 16448 [Edit]
Ponderings general 2. Post things you've thought about.

Previous thread >>15685
Expand all images
>> No. 16455 [Edit]
What if there is a yet undetected force, even weaker than gravity, but one that, over vast distances overcomes gravity. Distances like those between galaxies. A force which doesn't attract, but repells.

And that force drives the repelling of galaxies which we see today.
>> No. 16456 [Edit]
>>16455
I think that's more to do with the lack of any friction or air resistance in space that might prevent objects from moving away from the center of the universe.
>> No. 16457 [Edit]
File 134581489780.png - (13.77KB , 895x271 , 1345809830005.png )
16457
Are bears. the missing link between man and dog?
>> No. 16662 [Edit]
If 666 is the number of the beast, does that mean that the Devil got trips?
>> No. 16748 [Edit]
A long time ago, I realized that life was far more complicated than it should of been through a simple game of Rock, Paper, Scissors. I came to this conclusion based on the fact that people sometimes switch Scissors and Paper around and also with the fact that people have changed the standard timing (another hand swing before throwing their hand or throwing it immediately after Scissors/Paper. Even with specific details, they sometimes manage to get it wrong unless fully explained in full detail on how the game is to be played, which feels like a waste of time.

I came up with this thought when I used to go to elementary, so pardon me if it seems like a pretty meaningless thing to base the over-complication of life, but that was enough for me and still is as I was right, much to my disappointment.
>> No. 16857 [Edit]
You know the whole "going back in time to create something before it really gets created so you can take all the credit" thing?

What if a really famous game, manga, etc. was the result of that? Maybe your favorite work is technically a ripoff of something that would have come out two years later, had this one not come out first.

Just a thought I had, not trying to incite an argument or anything...
>> No. 16858 [Edit]
>>16857
interesting idea.
>> No. 16994 [Edit]
Why does "effeminate" mean feminine (roughly), but "emasculated" means un-masculine (roughly)?
>> No. 16995 [Edit]
>>16994
Well, the definition of Emasculated is: "the removal of the genitalia (castration) of a male, notably the penis and/or the testicles."

So, I guess that might answer you question? It all has to do with penis.
>> No. 16997 [Edit]
>>16995

My question was more about why they both have the "e-" prefix, but it means something different in each case. If "emasculate" followed the same logic as "effeminate", it would refer to a woman who acts in a masculine way. Or vice-versa, "to effeminate" would mean to remove (parts of) the female genitalia.

Similar to how flammable and inflammable mean the same thing, I guess.
>> No. 17000 [Edit]
>>16997
Apparently it's one of the words where the "e-" has "little effect on the signification".

I got that from here: http://www.r0k.org/dictionary/e.htm
>> No. 17001 [Edit]
>>17000

Interesting, thank you.
>> No. 17046 [Edit]
That detective said that pickpocketing could be learnt in an afternoon. I wonder if I can learn it alone, in my house.
>> No. 17112 [Edit]
I was masturbating to a mindbreak-themed manga yesterday night when I was very tired. It was a frightening experience.

The usually trite writing seemed all too relatable, it's as if I was becoming a slave to my penis through overwhelming sexual pleasure. Maybe there's more to the genre than meets the eye.
>> No. 17149 [Edit]
Maybe this belongs in /mai/, but whatever.

For some reason, I've been comparing the whole idea of having a waifu to religion in my head. I don't even mean that as a bad thing really. If anything, I'm thinking having a waifu is more or less the ideal religion without all the retarded bylaws.

Granted, there's probably always going to be at least some ratio (in both) of lone nuts who take things too far into delusion to those with the common sense to know that their (Haruhi/waifu) doesn't physically exist, but if their (Haruhi/waifu) lives on in their hearts and minds and inspires them somehow or helps them get through the stress of daily life, etc. etc. then there's really no harm done.

Not much of a point to all that, but it crossed my mind, so I guess I just felt like putting it out there.
>> No. 17154 [Edit]
why don't zombies ever try to rape people or have sex with each other?
no really. the whole I concept behind reanimated dead bodies eating people comes from the idea that when brought back from the dead, they're incapable of thinking properly, so they just carry out the most basic human needs, which of course means eating, but why don't they sleep, shit or fuck? and why do they only eat humans? If I had to guess I'd say the rotting smell of fellow zombies keep them from eating each other, but why not animals? wheres the logic behind that? it's not like they eat them off camura and they never show it, they've pointed out this fact, and one zombie movie, survival of the dead, focused on this as they tried to force zombies to eat animals.
>> No. 17158 [Edit]
>>17154
The closest that I've come to that is the Crossed comics. They're not really zombies, though.

It's a western comic, so I'm not sure if you'd be interested in it.
>> No. 17159 [Edit]
>>17154
Hasn't the blood stopped circulating in a zombie? They are walking corpses after all. They can't have sex if they can't get an erection.
>> No. 17161 [Edit]
>>17159
You're trying to use logic on an illogical science fiction creature. Zombies can have erections if they can have super strength and super fast regeneration.
>> No. 17163 [Edit]
>>17161
Don't forget about the lack of Rigamortis.
>> No. 17179 [Edit]
An obvious and probably stupid thought that I've been considering: I can say that the sky is blue, and another person might agree, but we may be seeing completely different things. If one person sees what I see as blue as red, and is taught from birth that that is blue, he'll certainly not be lying by agreeing that the sky is blue, but we are in complete disagreement while thinking we agree. Just an analogy and I'm sure science has already proven that our eyes interpret certain wave frequencies in the same way, but hopefully my point is clear and makes sense.
>> No. 17180 [Edit]
>>17179

I thought of this too when I was in middle school after one of my teachers said he was colorblind and saw green as grey.
>> No. 17186 [Edit]
File 13485262768.jpg - (55.12KB , 565x361 , George-Berkeley-Quotes-3.jpg )
17186
>>17179
I asked my teacher that in 6th grade (about colors of the sky, and pain) and she said that she didn't understand. If you're interested in this topic, it has a name: qualia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia
http://www.iep.utm.edu/qualia/
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia/
http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/papers/quinqual.htm

We can now today assume a numeric, object value to the colors we perceive around us with specialized technical devices, and we as well can analyze the relationship between rods and cones in our eye and see how a persons' relationship with colors can be affected through one defect or another.

A famous philosopher named George Berkeley used qualia (color, taste, pain, and so on) to argue that a sensible, functional picture of reality was dependent on the human mind, and following that, that our realities were primarily (if not totally) mental. His philosophy has a few flaws, but it's very easy to read and I find it amazingly exciting to read... if that sounds interesting to you, read one of these books by him:

* http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4724/4724-h/4724-h.htm#first
* http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4723/4723-h/4723-h.htm#intro

He talks about "Haruhi" some, but if you'd like, mentally replace that word with "nature" or "the world" or other such terms, as he uses it to refer to a non-personal force which unifies and gives source to a person's thought rather than to describe some kind of angry bearded man in the sky. So don't be scared off by that word if you see it! His language is quite antiquated; if possible, look past that and try to think heavily on his points. If nothing else, it'll be a good way to waste a bit of time. Hopefully that helps you think some.
>> No. 17187 [Edit]
Today I wondered if anyone has ever been banned from here.
>> No. 17188 [Edit]
>>17187
I've been banned from the IRC 3 times, each time by a different mod.
>> No. 17189 [Edit]
>>17187
There's been a few shitposters here, so I wouldn't doubt it.
>> No. 17190 [Edit]
>>17187
a few dozen, yes.
Sometimes people show up and spam the site with whatever shit they think is funny, and you just know they're never going to post anything coherent, so there's no question about it when it comes to banning them. on the other hand with people who just seem to be confused and not understand that we aren't 4chan, I prefer to just delete their retarded posts, and maybe give them a short ban of a day or few if they got really carried away.

Post edited on 24th Sep 2012, 5:28pm
>> No. 17217 [Edit]
File 134861030296.jpg - (151.47KB , 1024x819 , BorgCube1.jpg )
17217
>>17190
So you just delete whatever posts you don't like without a word?

No wonder this place comes off as such a dull, lifeless hivemind sometimes.

Oh well, guess there's always /jp/ for a change of pace. Really comes down to the question of preference, I guess. The utter chaos of near complete lack of moderation or the iron-fisted order of Nazi moderation?
>> No. 17220 [Edit]
File 134861149877.jpg - (566.17KB , 1152x864 , 61a0511e11a862bd6e83d32c70715e88.jpg )
17220
>>17217
that's how things are here, filthy anarchist, love it or leave it.
>> No. 17221 [Edit]
File 134861235340.jpg - (45.38KB , 500x375 , dontforget.jpg )
17221
>>17220
Believe me, I've tried the latter now and again.

But despite every non-4chan imageboard trying to distance themselves from 4chan, there's a certain little something they all still have in common. Pic very related.

Anyway, I honestly do kinda like it here, but if this was the only place I posted, I'd go batshit.
>> No. 17222 [Edit]
>>17221
>there's a certain little something they all still have in common. Pic very related

i don't understand
>> No. 17223 [Edit]
>>17217
yeah okay, next time some dickhead fin spams /mai/ with reaction faces making fun of the users, I'll just leave it. when /ot/ is flooded with prom photo threads, people will know who to thank.
>> No. 17224 [Edit]
>>17222
I mean imageboards are fucking addictive. Much like 4chan, I find it hard to leave and stay gone forever.

Sorry, wasn't sure if I was being clear there.
>> No. 17225 [Edit]
>>17223
kinda overreacting there
>> No. 17226 [Edit]
>>17225
fuck you, holy shit, what the fucking hell is wrong with you?! where do you get off saying I'm overreacting?! I'll perma ban your whole country you fucking cunt faced faggot! eat my shit and die motherfuckETR$$# nr4hegtsrg are45tr75t4eghrdgkf fds
>> No. 17227 [Edit]
File 134861412020.gif - (29.98KB , 117x125 , laugh fall.gif )
17227
>>17226
I'm really fast + strong and could totally beat you up!
>> No. 17234 [Edit]
>>17217
Of course. Whenever normality does as much as fart in our general direction we go ape shit. Even hardcore otaku have to be careful what they say here or else they'll get heckled off the board. Thats the whole point of Tohno-chan.
>> No. 17236 [Edit]
>>17234
In hindsight, I can't say I mind that much, just need a break from it every now and then, I guess. While I stand by most of what I said, sorry if the thread got derailed a bit there.
>> No. 17237 [Edit]
>>17221
Like around a week ago I went back to /jp/ to check on it because I haven't been there in forever because it got ruined by spam, people from other boards, and people so normal I question why they are there in the first place. It was horrible, some interesting things going on but the amount of trolls, normals, and complete assholes was overwhelming. It was like I just stepped into /b/ with a theme. I wanted to enjoy it and not care because they will always be there and always were but now it's just too much.
>> No. 17248 [Edit]
There's nothing really wrong with memes, as long as they're not popping up too much.
>> No. 17250 [Edit]
>>17248
Except that they are.
>> No. 17251 [Edit]
All human communication is just a complex of memes, in the sense of being units of cultural information subject to the evolutionary forces of being replicated and modified or being forgotten. The fact that this sentence begins with a capital letter and ends with a period is a meme in the original sense of the term.

/tc/'s supposed hatred of "memes" in general is really just an attack on certain low-status memes that we, as a small elitist culture, deem unfit for survival and replication. It's all the same brutal Darwinian bullshit that has always made the world the hellhole it is.

One doesn't win at the game of evolution, O Monks; one only minimizes one's losses at the expense of others.
>> No. 17253 [Edit]
>>17251
>brutal Darwinian bullshit that has always made the world the hellhole it is.

citation needed. what is the alternative?
>> No. 17257 [Edit]
File 134876183994.jpg - (473.96KB , 1280x1024 , 0920342.jpg )
17257
>>17237
What you have to do is just scroll past a lot of shit to find a small nugget or post good threads.

Not really rocket science, but I seem to hear it a lot when people talk about what boards suck.
>> No. 17259 [Edit]
>>17257
it's hard to find the motivation to swim through a sea of diarrhea just to read one or two decent posts
>> No. 17263 [Edit]
File 134878555536.jpg - (71.21KB , 515x720 , 66635_149773831730844_100000946841456_222077_50889.jpg )
17263
>>17259
Believe me, I know what you mean.


Tohno-chan is a nice break from the fake NEET bragging threads and shit posing as /jp/ culture.
>> No. 17265 [Edit]
>>17263
i think "/jp/ culture" is shit regardless of fakers and whatnot

that's why I'm on tohno-chan after all
>> No. 17270 [Edit]
File 134880655048.jpg - (469.59KB , 1600x1067 , kevin-carter-vulture.jpg )
17270
>>17253

Never said there was an alternative. Doesn't make nature any less horrifying, now does it?
>> No. 17369 [Edit]
>>17186
tahnks!
>> No. 17376 [Edit]
You'd be a lot happier if you dropped the EPIC QUALITY IMAGEBOARD POSTER pretensions already.

It's not like any of us are.
>> No. 17413 [Edit]
I wonder if women who had double masectomies have to wear tops in public.
>> No. 17416 [Edit]
>>17413
I don't see why not. Flat chested women still have to wear tops.
>> No. 17417 [Edit]
>>17416
Some women who have had breast cancer and had their breasts removed wear tops that barely cover anything and show it off.
>> No. 17418 [Edit]
>>17417
this is the first I'm hearing of this
>> No. 17482 [Edit]
I don't think showing everyone your hidesous scars would be very nice.
>> No. 17492 [Edit]
Oddly, it's completely legal for women to go topless in public in my country (Canada). The feminists fought for years to get this right but I can't say anyone really does it. Typical feminists...
>> No. 17498 [Edit]
>>17492
why the hell people would want go topless in Canada anyway?
>> No. 17499 [Edit]
I don't want to see anyone topless on the streets, women or man.
>> No. 17501 [Edit]
>>17499
Seconded.
>> No. 17502 [Edit]
>>17501
I wouldn't mind topless men.
>> No. 17504 [Edit]
>>17502
I bet you wouldn't.
>> No. 17536 [Edit]
I'm sick of Orwell quotes. People from all over the political spectrum like to quip them, while imagining themselves as champions of truth and justice.
>> No. 17540 [Edit]
>>17536
Whats so bad about Orwell?
>> No. 17542 [Edit]
>>17540
Nothing at all, it just feels cliché.
>> No. 17546 [Edit]
I'm surprised that I didn't even notice that this was a new thread.
>> No. 17599 [Edit]
After watching Chuunikoi EP2, I realized that live action productions have a very hard time making cats unrealistic because, as it turns out, they use real cats.
>> No. 17687 [Edit]
mysticism is the rhetoric of unknowables
>> No. 17696 [Edit]
capable hawks hide their talons out of sight
>> No. 17733 [Edit]
Today I was pondering which one is the right way: enjoy small enjoyments often and suffer long, or suffer small sufferings often and enjoy happy and healthy life. Yes it's junk food and sweets against exercise and restraining your food habits.
>> No. 17740 [Edit]
Studying shouldnt be some kind of all-consuming battle. Other people deal with it okay and there shouldn't be any reason why you can't too. Its just that you're studying dumb instead of studying smart. There is no way you can expect to get a decent mark if you don't go to every lecture. It is easy to get a decent mark by doing 2 hours of study a day.
>> No. 17791 [Edit]
>>17733

I love sweets, junk food and fizzy drinks so I consume a lot of them and have done so for years and years. My teeth are now so ruined that they can't really be called teeth anymore. It's a real mess. However, I don't regret my dietary habits and don't intend to change them. I think that since this life is the only one I have I should take whatever pleasures I can from it. Every so often I will get extreme constant pain that lasts for days at a time. For me, this isn't enough to deter me from something I love.

The only wrong thing I consider myself to have done is neglect my dental hygiene, such as brushing teeth regularly. But I wouldn't change how I eat.
>> No. 17792 [Edit]
>>17733
While I have been trying to restrain myself from snacking and only eating when I am actually hungry - it's hard for me to resist when I face constant boredom and browsing the internet somehow fuels this habit. I've gone back to drinking green tea, maybe as a substitute for coffee.
>> No. 17798 [Edit]
Why not just smoke a cigarette every time you reach for the Twinkie or Ho-oh? You'll lose a hundred pounds before you know it.
>> No. 17799 [Edit]
Smoking is for normals.

Post edited on 18th Oct 2012, 5:41pm
>> No. 17802 [Edit]
File 135060796018.gif - (954B , 54x42 , Ho-oh.gif )
17802
>>17798
>> No. 17803 [Edit]
>>17799
Breathing is for normals
>> No. 17805 [Edit]
File 135061271279.jpg - (63.72KB , 498x415 , halo cafe mocha.jpg )
17805
>>17798
Not him, but that's exactly what I've been doing over the last 15 years; now I'm starting to get really fucked up by it...

And so, I'm about to switch into e-cigarettes (Halo) which, apart from allegedly less damaging, come in several and tasty flavours (including sweets).
>> No. 17811 [Edit]
I should quit smoking...expensive habit.
>> No. 17819 [Edit]
>>17798
I would also lose much weight if I just cut my arms off. Stupid logic, why would anyone ruin their health to lose weight? (because purpose of losing weight is to feel healthier) And >>17799

>>17791
I think ruining teeth isn't the worst part of eating unhealthy. One just notices ruined teeth pretty soon. Maybe now it might feel okay but when you start to grow older, your blood veins will be filled with shit.

>>17792
I usually chew gum when get similar boredom feeling and I feel like eating, but I am not hungry.
>> No. 17871 [Edit]
>>17792
I need to stop also, it pisses me off so much when I do find myself snaking so much. Especially on Sundays which is the most boring day of the week to me. I just ate a bunch of popcorn out of total boredom and the depression of the moment since my head is flooded with terrible thoughts right now. It feels good when I actually do hold myself back though, like a huge burden has somehow been lifted off my back. It's a little thing that can make a big difference in my mood since feeling depressed and more ugly is just that much worse than feeling depressed not as ugly to myself.
>> No. 17875 [Edit]
Tohno-chan has been unusually slow recently. I ponder why.
>> No. 17877 [Edit]
>>17875
So it's not just me, then?

It's strange.
>> No. 17879 [Edit]
>>17875
I haven't noticed that much of a difference. I lurk here most days even if I don't always post. The other boards besides /ot/ and /so/ don't seem to get that much attention. Maybe we're all running out of things to say and talk about.
>> No. 17880 [Edit]
>>17875
we are all dying
>> No. 17881 [Edit]
Are you guys being sarcastic?
>> No. 17882 [Edit]
>>17881
Maybe.
>> No. 17883 [Edit]
>>17881
no
>> No. 17885 [Edit]
This website had been bothering me lately, and because my opinions are stupid and the stuff I like is brain-dead, I decided to stop posting about them and let the people with 'good' taste carry the site for a while.
I really didn't even think it would make much of a difference at first.
>> No. 17886 [Edit]
>>17885
My opinions on most things would be equally disliked most of the time so I also usually just keep my mouth shut here as I would anywhere else. I think I'm such a shit person that even this place would reject me.
>> No. 17925 [Edit]
I got to thinking about how people brake up with each other when one cheats on the other and it made me wonder.
Can you really say you ever truly loved a person if you're willing to completely brake off your relationship with them and never see them again?
If the person I really truly loved cheated on me or killed my mother or whatever, I'd be hurt sure, but I still wouldn't want to loose them. I'd just try to work past whatever problem we're having.
I might not have any experience with romance, but I don't think love is like a light switch you can just turn on and off.
>> No. 17926 [Edit]
>>17925
love is caused by chemical signals in your brain that can be turned on and off
>> No. 17927 [Edit]
>>17925
Usually when people break off when one cheats, they still love each other.
>> No. 17928 [Edit]
>>17925
If only it were like a light switch so that it could permanently stay off.

Life is nothing more than some bad joke.
>> No. 17929 [Edit]
>>17885
oh yeah, Decided to start posting again, whatever.
>> No. 17931 [Edit]
>>17927
If they still love each other, why would they brake up?

Post edited on 24th Oct 2012, 1:48am
>> No. 17934 [Edit]
>>17931
Because they don't see happy future together? Why would anyone in stay in relationship which just keeps hurting and problems seem unfixable? Like said, love isn't just switch you can turn off in instant.
>> No. 17935 [Edit]
>>17934
sounds like they don't really love each other in that case.
>> No. 17938 [Edit]
File 135107508035.jpg - (95.47KB , 541x401 , 133448254375.jpg )
17938
>> No. 17943 [Edit]
>>17935
How? Love isn't something which automatically removes all obstacles, hardships and makes world perfect.
>> No. 17947 [Edit]
>>17943
love can move mountains, it can overcome any obstacle.
>> No. 17948 [Edit]
What makes a work of art good?

>>17925
I'm sure you'd get irritated seeing your murderous whore ex-3DPD at the store with her arm wrapped around some other dude even if you still loved her. And limiting contact or displayed affection can certainly be controlled like a flip of a switch, even if the underlying irrational emotion can't.
>> No. 17954 [Edit]
>>17948
>What makes a work of art good?
First: what is art?
>> No. 17955 [Edit]
>>17954
A better question: what defines Art as an aesthetic experience?
>> No. 17956 [Edit]
>>17955
what do you mean by "aesthetic experience"?
>> No. 17958 [Edit]
>>17956
What Immanuel Kant might define as a heightened awareness of one's process of perception. Somewhat comparable to a 'altered state of consciousness' but not necessarily in the sense of taking hallucinogenic drugs.
>> No. 17959 [Edit]
>>17948
>What makes a work of art good?
The subjective taste of a ruling minority that wishes to indentify themselves as so. That is, if we are talking about paintings, music and such.
>> No. 17960 [Edit]
>>17954
>What is art?
Anything that a select group of people that think they know better wants it to be. This is as honest and true a concept as it may sound ridiculous.
>> No. 17965 [Edit]
>>17958
I was trying to make a joke but thanks for replying
>> No. 18163 [Edit]
The mistakes we have made in the past lead us to circles: we go back to the same point and make the same mistakes again and again.
And it's interesting to think about the concept of what we consider to be insanity.
An insane person believes that reality is what he experiences and sees.
He has created walls around him, imaginary structures that in his mind are the only reality. He isolates himself from all other realities.
And I would say that there's something selfish in that.
Now, it's also very interesting to think about some elements that characterize us all, absolute elements. Like the fact that we block things from our surrounding world.

Very interesting beings, don't you think.
>> No. 18228 [Edit]
Truth is not actually stranger than fiction; we just hold truth to a far lower standard of strangeness.
>> No. 18295 [Edit]
There are a certain class of philosophies, which tell we should not hold anything as true at all, because we can make mistakes in thought, and whatever we feel certain about, can easily prove to be one. There's a grain of truth in there, but it's impossible to doubt everything, as it is a form of the liar's paradox, it's a self-defeating idea. Notice that whenever we err, we err little, leaving the rest of our knowledge intact.

Maybe I'm fighting straw men.
>> No. 18303 [Edit]
>>18295
That is not philosophy. It is rhetoric, which is specifically what good philosophy should attack whenever possible. Socrates and Plato said of philosophy that there is a truth out there, and it is our job as philosophers to find it and bring it to light when possible, using logic as a framework and sensory information as evidence.
>> No. 18328 [Edit]
It is really strange to think that people actually exist. Maybe I've been too affected by games and anime and whatnot, but life seems a bit unreal whenever I go out, so when I think that things actually exist, I feel really surprised, since I feel as though I haven't experienced them at all.
>> No. 18332 [Edit]
I wonder how many tohno-channers don't have any mental problems.
>> No. 18358 [Edit]
>>18332

How many people have no mental problems? I doubt there are any.
>> No. 18362 [Edit]
Okay, maybe not 'problems'. Everyone has problems. Maybe mental illnesses.
>> No. 18364 [Edit]
I don't think I have any pathological mental problems. Never been to a psychiatrist though.
>> No. 18380 [Edit]
File 135274881819.jpg - (92.01KB , 576x768 , SIF-Overhead-Wires-1-Cropped.jpg )
18380
Utility poles must look really fucking sinister to someone who's never seen them. Endless rows of mutated, branchless trees connected by thin, black tendrils that hang menacingly over roads and buildings. Yet for us in the industrialized world, the creepy things just blend into the background.
>> No. 18381 [Edit]
File 135275128972.jpg - (72.07KB , 400x300 , utilities.jpg )
18381
High voltage transmission lines make me feel so secluded. Thousands of miles of pylons and wires stretch through forests and endless fields. And they don't break up at all. The wires are hundred- or thousand-mile-long objects. It's amazing.

There is an area near my place with them. Walking under them is... therapeutic.
>> No. 18383 [Edit]
>>18380
They never blend into the background for me, I always stare at them. They're pretty.
>> No. 18385 [Edit]
File 135275750746.jpg - (1.37MB , 1280x1275 , tumblr_lsvhgfruc71qbzxbbo1_1280.jpg )
18385
>>18381
I like transmission lines, too. There are a lot of them near my house. It's nice, but I never leave the house, so I never walk near them.

I also like scenes like the one pictured (enlarge it - it's big!). My entire "neighborhood" (If you can call it that) is like it. Isolated and dirty, and giving off a vibe of solitude. Just like me.

Post edited on 12th Nov 2012, 2:00pm
>> No. 18387 [Edit]
File 135276243087.png - (199.36KB , 500x357 , LAINU.png )
18387
Transmission...transmission...
>> No. 18388 [Edit]
>>18385
They're bad for you. I've been in areas with so many of them that the flashlight on my multimeter lit on its own.
>> No. 18646 [Edit]
I should learn how to make chicken katsu.
>> No. 18648 [Edit]
>>18646
For a second I had thought that you had typed up "chicken kakusu".
>> No. 18695 [Edit]
All bagpipe and drum songs begin exactly the same.

First five seconds of each of these:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9q61XZZpIv0&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Epimq-8ytOU&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpKt5QxoXMs&feature=relmfu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w655V4hZVe0&feature=related

I noticed this at the highland games but I didn't really think about it until I heard a playlist on someone's mp3 player. There were several different pipe and drum bands but all of them started out *drummmmmmmmmmTUM*... *drummmmmmmmTUM* *dying cat being pumped up the ass with a bicycle pump noise*
>> No. 18698 [Edit]
>>17925
Hmm, I've thought about this a lot. I see it as a control of your own emotions. Yes you are hurt even though you might still love them, but its a breach of trust. Why would you continue to date that person that ended up violating something so vital and central to your romantic world view such as monogamy? It's best to cut it off at that point and simply call it quits and consider the other person dead.

I see something like this with many other things that may define me as a person. If someone else ridicules what I like, or wants me to change, then can you really say they actually love me for me and not just my looks? It's also why I never saw the big deal with people trying to "fit in" by having sex with prostitutes just to say they're not a virgin. I have no problem with whatever the hell you do, just don't bother me because we just are not compatible.

see how easy?
>> No. 18840 [Edit]
I realize that it's only twenty-two days until the supposed end of the world. I've managed to substantially spook myself out. I read that the atmosphere might just drift away due to magnetic disruption from the sun and...that idea is terrifying.

Also, the whole Ponponpon back-masking thing.
>Let's die!
>The world is ending anyway!

And...yeah. I feel like a more insane Satou right now. Could a scientifically-minded Brohno debunk the atmosphere hypothesis for me? I just want to get some SCIENCE behind it.
>> No. 18841 [Edit]
>>18840
Actually, I just googled it, haha. Fears at ease, I'm a paranoid fool~ Sorry for wasting bandwith.

On the topic of fear...The idea of innocent-seeming things (such as the aforementioned Jpop backmasking) hiding sinister messages/symbols can both simultaneously fascinate me and give me the most black fear. Why is that? Is anyone the same way?

The idea of Kyary saying stuff like that to a bunch of Japanese tweens/American hipster otaku really horrifies me.
>> No. 18869 [Edit]
>>18841
I know giving advice to other Brohnos is often a futile measure, but for the love of Haruhi, please, stop taking drugs.
>> No. 18888 [Edit]
>>18841
It fascinates me to, I've always saw something twisted in the most innocent seeming things too before I even knew what subliminal messages and such were. For these reasons when I was little and my parents put me in front of the TV I always felt uneasy watching your ordinary American children's shows. I don't know what I saw, but to me there was always something wrong with them. I had no problems watching anime though even though the case was the same, so anime and many Japanese things stuck with me.
>> No. 19011 [Edit]
>>18388
Aren't there theories of magnetic fields from high voltage lines giving you cancer?

>>18869
At least the shit which makes you paranoid.
>> No. 19079 [Edit]
I realized why I'm clingy today.

I'm not clingy in the traditional sense - I'll try and put people at an arm's length if I can, but I cling to memories like there's no tomorrow. I'll try and relive them while lying in bed, often for hours, when I should be sleeping.

This is because I don't have many happy memories. I have "small memories". To elaborate, I have petty, shitty memories. I've never truly lived and had a normal life. It's interesting to realize this.
>> No. 19085 [Edit]
>>19079
Thanks for telling us.
We were all just waiting for you to post about your life.
>> No. 19126 [Edit]
>>19079
Same here, memories may keep me awake sometimes if it's not too many thoughts invading my head all at once. My good memories are so personal and stupid in the eyes of others I'm not even going to bother typing an example. But I can be out of the house and just go somewhere at the right time and I'm happy with the experience. Very little of my good memories have to do with any people altogether, it's more like people like my father and such have to be in them constantly since I can hardly go anywhere on my own. I take comfort in places and times with small events and important details tying them together. That's meaning to me.
>> No. 19148 [Edit]
Is it just me, or does anyone else feel as though the advancement of Personal computing technology is kinda redundant when everything out there becomes more and more demanding while setting the bar for minimum PC standards higher and higher?
makes it feel kinda pointless to keep spending money on 'upgrading' your computer just to stay at the same minimum required levels.
a crappy PC today might be ten times more powerful than a high end PC from 10 years ago, but it's still considered a crappy PC all the same just becuase everything is more demanding, and sure enough it'll be a worthless pile of scrap you can't even give away at a yardsale in another 10 years from now.
We've got bigger hard drives, but everything takes up more space now. Ram is more affordable, but now operating systems require more than before. we've got better internet connections, but websites have become more resource demanding.
I guess it's a natural part of advancement in technology, but it still seems weird for some reason...
>> No. 19150 [Edit]
>>19148
That's why I don't play PC games until they've been out for five years or so.
>> No. 19151 [Edit]
It really is, I always thought this my entire life I've been playing them. There would always be games you can play and games you can't. When the computer got upgraded I could play a little more but then most things were still out of the reach. When I got a new pc a long time ago with a Nvidia 9800GT and a quadcore processor running at 3.2 GHz I thought I was all set but no some games require a super computer to run smoothly. I can play everything but many newer games just don't run smoothly. I play mostly older games anyways so what I have now is fine for me though. Don't know when I should replace parts though to keep the pc going. Already had it for years and had to replace the power supply. But soon I think we really will hit a wall in computer technology. When the standard pc is so powerful there isn't much need to upgrade since it will come with a large 1 TB HD at least and a processor and graphics card so good it can run everything. But then when we reach that point they will start making computers more easily broken so they can keep raking in the money.

Post edited on 11th Dec 2012, 7:15am
>> No. 19152 [Edit]
>>19151
I bought my PC tower prebuilt ($800) a few years ago and came with a 1TB harddrive, 8GB of ram and a quadcore, but the guys still make fun of me for it and call it shit.
>> No. 19153 [Edit]
>>19152
I have a computer with a 500GB hard drive and 4B of memory
>> No. 19155 [Edit]
>>19148
I think that people are getting worse at optimizing their code, but it's not a problem for most people since new hardware is continuously being pumped out. But for those of us who can't afford new CPUs and graphics cards every other month (or use a laptop), we're out of luck.

I hope someday we reach a limit on hardware speeds, which will force programmers to learn how to code properly again.
>> No. 19156 [Edit]
>>19155
I typed up a rant about how programmers these days are terrible and have piss poor coding with very little optimization to none, but I ended up not posting it. I also forgot most of it.
>> No. 19163 [Edit]
>>19155
I shouldn't have to buy a new processor just to view a website run by retards who have no self control with flash or scripts.
I'm looking at you Danny cho and your piece of shit figure.fm!
>> No. 19164 [Edit]
High-level programming languages let a single person write a program in a day that used to take a month for a team to write. But all of this is off-topic.
>> No. 19170 [Edit]
>>19164
The whole board is off topic, who cares?

oh wait, it's Otaku Tangents now...
>> No. 19173 [Edit]
>>19164
You mean technology is becoming more advanced as time goes on? That's a shocker.
>> No. 19174 [Edit]
>>19173
It isnt always the case. Ask the people in Western Europe after the fall of the Roman empire about technology. I dont think its a stretch to say something similar could happen if our communications infrastructure was destroyed and there was no more internet.
>> No. 19175 [Edit]
>>19173
I think what he means is that higher level languages may be slow, but they allow you to get stuff done faster since they're much easier.

But that doesn't mean that both interpreters/compilers and the programs that run on them can't be better-written.
>> No. 19176 [Edit]
The advancement of computer technology (at least the kind for personal use.) feels like running on a treadmill. you'll always be barely keeping up to the current levels while never really getting anywhere no matter how fast you run.
>> No. 19177 [Edit]
>>19176
RAM and processing power becomes cheaper so Microsoft release a new OS that uses more resources and every company comes out with new bloatware...

I just upgraded to the latest iTunes btw. I've never had any complaints about this program before but the new interface is terrible.
>> No. 19217 [Edit]
If you work on personalising windows 7 and Vista UI to look like Windows 95 then it usually runs a lot faster.

Basically, more OSs are using more memory to make things look pretty(translucent windows, docks, multiple "desktops", fade transition backgrounds, wiggly windows, etc etc) Which is basically what consumer electronics exist for now.

Meanwhile Ubuntu can do all the visual stuff Windows 7 can do (and more if you want) while being able to run without freezing up any PC with hardware from pre-2008.
>> No. 19219 [Edit]
>>19217
I've been doing that to save battery power on my laptop. I just wish it didn't make so many programs look awkward, since they're mostly tailored to work with Aero.
>> No. 19220 [Edit]
I'm still using XP and I highly recommend it.
>> No. 19221 [Edit]
>>19177
So true, you just can't completely keep up. There is no way I am upgrading (more like downgrading) to Windows 8, terrible OS that probably also consumes a shit load more pc resources whilst being even less functional than a traditional all desktop focused OS. Hope Windows 9 will be back to normal again.

Also I have heard a lot of news about the new itunes update, I never update my itunes so I don't know what it's like but almost everyone is saying it's horrible. What is it with all of these updates ruining everything? That's almost all they ever do these days for most things.
>> No. 19222 [Edit]
>>19220

Me too. Well, I have XP in a VM on Linux Mint just in case I want to run a game or something that Wine can't handle. Still, for an 11-year-old OS, it does pretty much everything I need it to do.
>> No. 19224 [Edit]
>>19221
Yeah I hate updates unless they're actually adding something usefully.
>> No. 19249 [Edit]
almost everyone in Lucky Star is left handed, wtf
>> No. 19256 [Edit]
>>19249
Really? I didn't know. I didn't eve know that there were any south paws on that show.
>> No. 19262 [Edit]
Do console companies plan the slim version of a console first, but release a more inferior one just to make more money later?
>> No. 19263 [Edit]
>>19262
you serious?
They use the best technology availability at the time(more or less), then when the parts get cheaper and smaller, they release cheaper and smaller versions of their consoles.
and fyi, slim versions aren't always better than lunch versions. In the case of ps3 for example, the original versions were the best with each one after being a downgrade.
>> No. 19264 [Edit]
>>19249
>>19256
Yeah, only Patty and Konata are not (and Konata's ambidextrous).

I thought for a bit that left-handedness is common in Japan (if you've ever written Japanese in the traditional orientation you notice your hand may drag through the wet sumi if you're right handed) but no, statistically Lucky Star is incredibly unrealistic.
>> No. 19279 [Edit]
>>19264
I had read that left handedness is quite disencouraged in China and Japan and children are forced to write right-handed only(this last seems more common in China), also heard from left-handed foreigners natives were oftenly amazed by how they were even able to write hanzi/kanji with the left hands at all.
And while it's true what you've said about writing in traditional orientation, as a left-handed person I feel the direction of most horizontal strokes is quite optimized for right-handers, as it's easier to keep stability when moving towards your arm rather than away from it.
Now it makes me ponder why did they stick with stroke orders which favour the right handed but writing orientation that favours the left handed. Some deep zen yin-yang shit, man.
>> No. 19284 [Edit]
>>19263

Yeah, I wouldn't know anything about that. I just assumed like the companies would do that because I never really understood why they would release a "better" version of the same console. I guess I thought that way because of the 4 versions of PSPs there are. 1000, 2000, 3000... and Go..
>> No. 19286 [Edit]
I've been noticed Chinese people are treated as sort of below Japanese and Korean people. And lets face it, they are.
>> No. 19309 [Edit]
Society is just a series of hat changes, no ideology matches reality and even the most purportedly liberal person will approve of making certain people the underclass.
>> No. 19312 [Edit]
When people are allowed to vote for leaders, they always seem to vote for the ones that will give them free stuff from the government at the expense of other tax payers. Does that mean democracy is a form of implicit socialism? Either it is or I'm just a cretin who doesn't know what he's talking about.
>> No. 19314 [Edit]
>>19312
That's how I vote and it's just simple self-interest, not socialism.
>> No. 19323 [Edit]
>>19309
The most liberal people seem bent on making themselves the underclass. Well, here in the US at least, where the most liberal people are middle class and saddled with white guilt. Whether this compulsion would stem from trying to assay their crippling white guilt or from longing for a more "authentic", less privileged life, I'm unsure. Probably a healthy mix of the two in most cases.
This is my impression, at least. I'm hardly educated in the subjects that relate to this.
>> No. 19409 [Edit]
I had amassed approx. 4000 e-books. Now I've deleted about half of them, but still a lot remains to get rid of. According to my estimations, I won't read more than 500 books in the next ten years.
In a way, this makes me sad. There's so much I'll never know. I'll have to prioritize my learnings, decide what's important and what isn't.
>> No. 19414 [Edit]
>>19409
>In a way, this makes me sad. There's so much I'll never know.
This is why libraries make me sad. It reminds me of how worthless I am.
>> No. 19560 [Edit]
If there's no friction or air resistance in space, why can't a object with a propulsion system gradually and continuously accelerate faster and faster and eventually travel faster than light? What's holding it back?
>> No. 19566 [Edit]
>>19560
I heard that mass increases (slightly) with speed, so the faster you're going, the harder you become to propel.

But I haven't studied physics in years, so I don't really know.
>> No. 19567 [Edit]
>>19566
I think thats the correct answer (i only did high school physics though). As you continue to add energy to an object travelling near light speed, the object "stores" this energy as an increase of mass rather than an increase in velocity. This can be understood from the famous Einstein equation e = mc², ( energy = mass * speed of light squared ) in this case becoming m = e/c². Energy and mass are just different forms of the same thing. When you pump more energy into an object to make it go faster that energy is translated into mass. -some dude on yahoo answers
>> No. 19591 [Edit]
>>19560
Stephen Hawking did a documentary several years ago about this kind of thing. I think it was Stephen Hawking's Universe, but I can't remember. It covered stuff like this and was very interesting. Go check it out.

http://vimeo.com/17477895
http://dsc.discovery.com/tv-shows/other-shows/videos/stephen-hawkings-universe-time-travel-starship.htm

As you approach the speed of light, some shit happens and the time around you slows down. Like a clock on a plane going near the atmosphere will have a different time to a clock that was just kept on the ground. I can't remember relativity theory that well.

Post edited on 25th Dec 2012, 8:47am
>> No. 19706 [Edit]
I wonder if people were actually honest and sincere in the old days or if people have always been cynical pricks and thought that the horrible things they did were done 'ironically' for shits and giggles.
>> No. 19707 [Edit]
>>19706
They were done because it couldn't be helped.
>> No. 19713 [Edit]
When people rail against "the rich", does it occur to them that they themselves (and their families, friends, etc.) are included therein too?...
>> No. 19714 [Edit]
>>19713
Most people who hate the rich don't view themselves as rich by comparison, even if they're rich by comparison to people in third world countries, or even the poor/homeless in their own country. they just don't think about or care about those people.
>> No. 19960 [Edit]
Why do they assume a line is a collection of points? Clearly, where two lines intersect, a point is created, but was the point of intersection already there? We cannot even talk about that point, without giving a description of it, so why assume it's something basic?
>> No. 19987 [Edit]
File 135788292825.png - (47.53KB , 578x410 , RealLine.png )
19987
>>19960

Short answer:
So the line has no thickness.

Longest answer:
1. So the definition 4 in Euclid's Elements has some sense, since previously he only stated that the ends of finite lines were points.
2. So we can conceptually arrive to the general function L of any given straight line, by which the very 2-dimensional object can be understood as the subset of points of the plane that results from the cartesian product of the real numbers with themselves, and which relation is given by that very function y=L(x) (i.e. L={(x,y)/y=mx,m∈Q} ⊂ R^2). In consequence, by such new aproach and definition, it can be later proven that the line, just like any n-dimensional trajectory and finite collections of dots, is a zero content set on his space (i.e. something without any "thickness" indeed, be it area, volume or nth-hypervolume).

The more you know...
Note that this does NOT imply that the line is a sequence of points (not even infinite) and that believing such thing would be a nonsense, since no continuity (the main property of a line and any given trajectory) can be obtained by putting in discrete order, one right next to the other, a bunch of things with no extension at all (namely: points). Thus, another property is needed to complete the line with only points; not even density alone can do it, since Q is a dense set alright (i.e. there's always a rational between any two given rationals) but there are constructible numbers which hence should be in the (real) line but can't be reached by quotients (e.g. √2). What is needed to complete the continuum, and which makes line the universal representation of real numbers, is the least upper bound property, thus acknowledged and set in stone as THE real numbers' Completeness Axiom.

Post edited on 10th Jan 2013, 10:08pm
>> No. 21072 [Edit]
Reflection is not rotation, somewhat counter-intuitively. This fact still makes me uneasy and frustrated: I'm certain about it, yet somehow I still feel a slight sense of falsity.
Someone should make a game, where certain teleports not only translate and rotate you, but also reflect. For you, it would appear you arrived to the mirror image of the world you started in. Where you had to turn left, you would have to turn right, &vv. For others, the weapon which was in your right hand, would be in your left hand from then. Both effects would be reverted by passing through that portal once again.
>> No. 21073 [Edit]
File 13634933073.png - (4.26KB , 337x157 , congruent2.png )
21073
>>21072
>Reflection is not rotation, somewhat counter-intuitively.
And that's why intuition (let alone feminine intuition) isn't worth a dim.

You might have figured it out already. However: you think of it as a rotation because, "intuitively", you can very well rotate a papercut to such effect in the 3D space where you and me belong alright; but that's not the case with the 2D figure or graphic of the function you're really dealing with: for a 2D entity, to do such thing as "flying away and landing the other side" would be like... dunno, sorcery, bullshit, opening its chakras with LSD or some shit. Despite reflection being a rigid transformation, it's impossible to get a mirror version of a 2D figure with any composition of 2-dimensional rotation functions; it's like how, in 3D, you can ideally spin any way you like without compromising the integrity of your body, but I'd like you to tell me how to turn you bilateral left side into your right one and vice versa without something like magic, as you already kind of pointed out yourself.

However, there was another guy who failed to see that flying papercuts cannot constitute a 2D formal proof for anything: Euclid, when trying to prove the proposition about congruent triangles, if I remember correctly.
>> No. 21078 [Edit]
Why did people ever think domesticating elephants for warfare was a good idea? Seemingly every second battle involving them ends up with the enemy faction scaring the elephants via horns or chariots and ends up with them going completely berserk, trampling all over their allies. Really now.
>> No. 21567 [Edit]
Browsing depressing forums like /so/ will not help you. It will not make you stronger. All it will do is poison your brain. Surrounding yourself with other people who agree and encourage your pessimism and self-wallowing can only do bad things.
>> No. 22073 [Edit]
I read in a book about logic, that two objects are equal, when their properties are exactly the same. (Russell seems to have agreed.)
I'm not sure if we can accept this definition, as it is self-referent. Let there be two objects, A and B. In one of possible worlds, A and B match in every property, except for "being equal to A", which holds for A, but doesn't hold for B. Conversely, we cannot conclude A=B, before assuming A=B (as "A=_" is a property by itself), making any inference of object equality trivial.
So Wittgenstein was right, equality is not between objects, but between formulae; equality is a metalingual relation.
>> No. 22074 [Edit]
On a slightly related note, the Morning Star is not the Evening Star. If I said "Today at 4AM, I saw the Evening Star.", you would correct me, as you should, indicating the two cannot be interchanged.
>> No. 22463 [Edit]
Considering how powerful modern day computers are, and how advanced ai is becoming along with our understanding of other cultures and their languages... why can't machines produce proper translations worth a damn yet?

Is it really so hard to make a program that can understand the context of words in a sentence based off the other words in the same sentence to create a translation rather than just translating each individual word on it's own? Is modern day computing technology really incapable of analyzing a combination of words and determining the most logical meaning of those words for a different language?
>> No. 22674 [Edit]
When someone uses a straw man argument, stop reading immediately. He either has bad logic, didn't research enough, or wants to deceive you.
>> No. 22675 [Edit]
Those that go out of their way to appear intellectual or educated to others, particularly on the internet, are generally insecure about their own cognitive abilities (and for good reason). To be clear, I'm not bashing this thread, as only a couple people here are really guilty of this.
>> No. 22683 [Edit]
>>22675

Being insecure and having self esteem issues doesn't really have much to do with one's cognitive abilities.
>> No. 22688 [Edit]
>>22683
What are you even going on about? I only mentioned insecurity in regards to intellectual capacity, not self-esteem as a whole. The point I was trying to make was that people that like to portray themselves as highly intelligent/educated tend to be:

A) Of near-average intellectual ability and wisdom
B) Insecure about it

This is saying nothing of their security or their self-esteem in any other 'area'. The idea is that legitimately intelligent people (as opposed to those simply putting up a facade) don't feel the need to keep proving or reaffirming their supposed intellectual talents to everyone else, especially to strangers over the internet.
>> No. 22694 [Edit]
>>22688
if you are going to open every post you make with "What are you even going on about?" you may as well just become a namefag, it sticks out like a sore thumb ever to someone of near-average intellectual ability and wisdom like myself.
>> No. 22696 [Edit]
>>22694
That's literally the second time I've ever used the phrase, and the third time I've seen it on the site to my knowledge. Are you actually so upset about my calling out your strawman arguments that you're going to resort to whining about something as trivial as that?

Post edited on 8th Aug 2013, 6:18pm
>> No. 22701 [Edit]
>>22694
I'm one of the guys who said 'What are you even going on about?' recently, and that was the first time I said it in a while on T-C. What are you even going on about is a fairly common phrase anon, not like everyone who says it is the same person.

Post edited on 9th Aug 2013, 1:51am
>> No. 22705 [Edit]
>>22688

>The idea is that legitimately intelligent people don't feel the need to keep proving or reaffirming their supposed intellectual talents to everyone else, especially to strangers over the internet.

And I'm saying that's a bullshit generalization based on nothing but your own imagination (or at very best your own limited experience). Considering where you are I think explaining it with self esteem issues is a rather safe bet.
>> No. 22706 [Edit]
>>22705
>limited experience
I'm curious as to what makes you think your own experiences are less limited than mine. I've been a hikikomori with far too much time to spare for a good decade now. It's nothing to be proud of, but I've seen more than enough "pseudo-intellectuals" (for lack of a better term) pushed and called out on their facades over the years to be pretty confident that they're not even a fraction as educated as they believe themselves to be. There are exceptions to every rule, and I'm sure there are more general 'self-esteem issues' to take into consideration on TC than other places on the internet, but it doesn't make the site immune to the type of shmuck I described above.

Again, I'm not bashing the thread. I've participated in it prior to this myself. Some people (two?) just seem more intent on talking about themselves than actually discussing or pondering anything.

Post edited on 9th Aug 2013, 1:26pm
>> No. 23061 [Edit]
 
What do you think /tc/?

Can we think without language?
What's the purpose of silence?
Do we need bodies to love (or live at all)?
Where does truth lay (language or the world)?
Where does true love lay (the thought or the world)?
>> No. 23117 [Edit]
File 138294069242.jpg - (99.62KB , 704x1100 , eva_book05_issue03_pg_23t.jpg )
23117
"Maybe any serious communication between two people is useless. Even when they're outright lying, people only hear what really want to hear or what they're capable of hearing, which often holds very little resemblance with what is actually said..."

I've found this to be probably the most important and persistent problem within the human condition. Not injustice, not violence, not the failure of any meaningful category but the problem of them really computing at all. The problem of communication. The problem of language, as an alleged bridge between one and the others, between one and the world. And I sincerely feel utterly lost about it; I thought the only thing that could bring some hope was anonymity, but I was utterly wrong: I'm usually just as misunderstood in these kind of places as I am everywhere else; and I guess the same goes for the others: I do not understand you either (how could I possibly?). We're all echoing the same chants on each one's heads and imposing them on others each time we allegedly identify with someone else, be it a living person, an author or a character. This is just damned sad and disheartening... allow me to finish the previous quote:

"I've been wondering... whether love is something I'm really capable of."

...or what could it mean at all, other than the soliloquy of the waifu. I don't know what I want to be but I just know that I don't want to be like this anymore. I don't want to be this "human" thing anymore, as it persists to be, because:

"I can't tell what is real"
----Paul Weston ("In Treatment")

And just deciding nothing is... well... left me in this place, where I'm bounded to fall into nonsense, into nothing, into this artifact of me babbling myself to death.

Is there anybody out there?
Who are you?
>> No. 23118 [Edit]
>>23117
The fact that people can not fully understand each other doesn't mean there is no value in communicating or that human relationships are worthless. Its still worth it, even Shinji accepted this in the end.
>> No. 23121 [Edit]
Life is a joke.
>> No. 23126 [Edit]
>>23121
How nihilist.
>> No. 23131 [Edit]
>>23126

Not necessarily. I agree with >>23121 but it doesn't mean the joke has to be on you. Taking life seriously is a surefire way to make yourself miserable. You're supposed to laugh along.
>> No. 23181 [Edit]
Repeat after me: Breasts and uteruses and penises are not sexual. Sociology distinguishes between biological reproductive organs and sexual acts. Breasts may be considered a sex signifier on female-coded people, but they are not actually for sex. Society makes them about sex by emphasizing the purpose of breasts in titillating men, but in actuality breasts are just lumps of fat and muscle that excrete milk. Penises, likewise, aren’t there just for sex: people with penises use them to pee. And people with uteruses who have periods often like to make jokes about how they want to violently remove their uteruses, because they seriously suck. Notice what all these body parts have in common? That’s right. They are not about sex.
--- Texts From Walpurgis Night

To think that this was written by a woman left my mind in blank. To realize she's a lesbian put me back together.
>> No. 23183 [Edit]
>>23181
That isnt anything groundbreaking, everyone learns that stuff growing up.
I might as well start writing down really basic observations and stamp my name on it, so jizzbags online will quote me and maybe earn me some dosh.
>> No. 23185 [Edit]
>>23183
that wasn't the point but ok: give it a shot. I'll read you shit.
>> No. 23187 [Edit]
>>23131

Funny, I picked up some random compilation of Oscar Wilde's plays when I was at the library a couple weeks ago and...

I was on the point of explaining to Gerald that the world has always laughed at its own tragedies, that being the only way in which it has been able to bear them. And that, consequently, whatever the world has treated seriously belongs to the comedy side of things.

Always nice to randomly find your thoughts expressed in literature. In a way better manner of course.
>> No. 23190 [Edit]
>>23187
Tragedy and Comedy are twin children of Poetry. Haruhi knows who's the evil one though.

----------
"I don't know if this is a comedy or a tragedy, but in any case is a masterpiece" ---Haruhiard
>> No. 23191 [Edit]
>>23190
>haruhiard
well that was unexpected
>> No. 23268 [Edit]
why are people from earth always called 'humans' in scifi when pretty much every other race is named after their home planet?
>> No. 23269 [Edit]
>>23268
The same reason people from the USA are called "americans" when pretty much every other nationality is named after its home country, I guess.
>> No. 23270 [Edit]
>>23268
Don't aliens call us earthlings?
>> No. 23271 [Edit]
>>23268
Because it emphasizes the fact that they are non-human.
>> No. 23272 [Edit]
>>23269
What else would you call people from the united states of america? u.s.a.ers?
>> No. 23273 [Edit]
>>23272
In both spanish and portuguese there are common words, roughly equivalent to "unitedstatian", to describe US nationals. It would get messy should United States of Africa ever materialize, but then, so would "USA".
>> No. 23275 [Edit]
File 138518104819.jpg - (19.69KB , 350x287 , 4047928_orig.jpg )
23275
>>23269

Oh for fuck's sake.

America is not a continent. North America is a continent. South America is a continent. Together, they are called "the Americas".

"America" by itself is a country. Its people are called Americans. These words don't mean anything else. Please let this retarded "durhur but Canada and Mexico are part of America too!!!!1" factoid die already.

Fucking hell.
>> No. 23276 [Edit]
>>23275
So then, "British" only refers to the English then?
>> No. 23277 [Edit]
>>23276
Yeah pretty much. You wouldn't call something Scottish "British".

Or at least I wouldn't.
>> No. 23278 [Edit]
>>23276

The terminology there is more complex and FAR more contentious. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminology_of_the_British_Isles. In any case, it's a totally different context. The closest equivalent would be referring to a person from the Republic of Ireland as British just because Ireland (the island) is part of the "British Isles".

Would you really call someone from Canada an American? No, because they'd think you're a moron. "American" unambiguously refers to people from the United States of America.
>> No. 23280 [Edit]
>>23275
>America is not a continent.
Never said it was.

>"America" by itself is a country.
Merriam-Webster partly disagrees http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/america

Bit of a language tangent, but it is of note that in spanish and portuguese "América" is indeed a continent, no nitpicking about the plural "s" either.
>> No. 23343 [Edit]
I dream about a women-less world.
I really, really, really do.
>> No. 23344 [Edit]
I'd rather live in a world where sex and masturbation harm your health than one where swabbing the inner year does.
My hopes for our transhuman future is precisely the development of a new ear which not only is not harmed by the act, but which presents a greater sensibility to the soft cotton touch, being able to elevate us to an yet unknown state of pure climax, sensual experience and intimacy both with oneself and the world; twice, once for each ear. Also, no yellow-ish wax, it looks gross. Maybe everyone could chose what color their wax would be.
Not only that, but the vulgar contortions and abrasions of penetrative sex would be replaced by the gentle and pure resting on your lovers' lap as s/he tends to your ear, then you his/hers, and yet again from the beginning for the other ear. A lot more symmetric too, that's good.
>> No. 23346 [Edit]
>>23343
that'd be pretty gay
>> No. 23347 [Edit]
>>23343
I wouldn't go that far. I dream of a world where they all simply act like and identify as regular human beings, instead of a self-entitled faction that both plays the victim and accepts favoritism in the same breath.
>> No. 23348 [Edit]
>>23347
Now this guy, he's got the right idea.
>> No. 23350 [Edit]
File 138621714146.gif - (15.83KB , 296x319 , izo24.gif )
23350
Just like dinosaurs and fern forests had to disappear in order to become the oil and carbon we use, women should go extinct so their insidious presence can be completely overwritten with their image in our heads, which is the actual fuel for our dreams and nightmares of love.
>> No. 23356 [Edit]
>>23350
Both women and men are pieces of shit.
>> No. 23357 [Edit]
>>23356

Always good to see somebody who is smart enough to forget about misogyny and fully embrace superior misanthropic beliefs.
>> No. 23358 [Edit]
>>23350
Oh so us smelly neckbearded master race can shuffle around like mindless zombies doing nothing but aging until the inevitable decline and erasure of the species? Yeah sounds great I'd love to live in a world with no internet, electricity, or food.

I can get on board with entering 2D but this shit's pretty mindless.
>> No. 23361 [Edit]
>>23357
I really hope you're not implying that believing that women shouldn't receive special treatment for simply being born female qualifies as 'misogyny'. I see enough of that dreck outside of TC.
>> No. 23362 [Edit]
>>23361

Nah, it's you who actually distinguishes between men and women. Human beings are all equally shit regardless of their gender.
>> No. 23363 [Edit]
>>23362
Swing and a miss.

I'll agree that humans are all shitty, but I don't think you're grasping what you're even replying to. An individual person's opinions on each gender has absolutely nothing to do with how they're treated as a social class.
>> No. 23364 [Edit]
If you get into an accident and some paramedics hall you away in a ambulance without your permission, couldn't it be considered a form of kidnapping? Could it not also be considered a form of extortion when they bill you for services you didn't ask for or were unable to refuse? (like if you were knocked out)
>> No. 23369 [Edit]
File 138656286415.jpg - (163.75KB , 1313x843 , douche that hysteric.jpg )
23369
>>23358
So it was true, Shinden: you really suck...

The point was precisely about finally fulfilling love with technology, replacing flesh with number, towards becoming ourselves something better than panting, aging and idiotically breeding beasts. Power and knowledge belong to men; women, as such, are mere troublesome sex toys and incubators that bleed on the Moon's command: they're way too "natural"/animalistic, thus a burden for posthumanity; so the point is to eradicate them and substitute them with dolls, AI, eugenics and such, rendering gender roles as entirely social, as a first step to abolish our disgusting biological condition. To live up actual love stories, we must first aim it towards actual characters and finally become actual characters ourselves.
>> No. 23380 [Edit]
Not my own thought, but I felt like sharing,

Until you value yourself, you won't value your time. Until you value your time, you won't do anything with it.
>> No. 23393 [Edit]
I feel like that song about the fox was written by a furry. It's possible that the person asked what sound it made on some message board and got joke responses, then made a song out of it. Then again, I'm pretty much just making a bunch of stupid guesses.
>> No. 23397 [Edit]
>>23393
What song is this?
>> No. 23398 [Edit]
>>23397
That popular song called The Fox (What does the fox say?).

Some people take it as satire. I was just taking it from a serious point in that last post, but I dunno what to think of it. It's too much effort to actually put thought into that though.
>> No. 24130 [Edit]
File 140242295611.jpg - (30.76KB , 314x450 , Cleverbot is a naive positivst.jpg )
24130
Asked Cleverbot about my thesis.
Didn't help much.
>> No. 24133 [Edit]
I wonder how hard it would be to sneak popcorn into a movie theater. Popcorn that hasn't gotten stale during the trip there mind you.
>> No. 24135 [Edit]
>>24133
Buying the popcorn at the movie theatre?
>> No. 24136 [Edit]
>>24133
You can hide the popcorn in your anus/vagina or just swallow the whole package without opening it and going to the bathroom to retrieve it in the middle of the film.
Works for coke, why shouldn't it work for popcorn?
>> No. 24140 [Edit]
File
Removed
The Taylor Swift song "You Belong With Me" could be interpreted as Death lamenting someone deciding not to suicide. Or, as Life stealing someone away from Death. Here are some excerpts that support this interpretation.

>You're on the phone with your 3DPD, she's upset
>She's going off about something that you said
People tend to get upset when someone announces suicidal ideation.

>'Cause she doesn't get your humor like I do.
This suicidal person clearly has gallows humor

>Dreamin' 'bout the day when you wake up and find
>That what you're looking for has been here the whole time
>If you could see that I'm the one who understands you
>Been here all along, so why can't you see
>You belong with me?
>You belong with me
>Walkin' the streets with you and your worn out jeans
>I can't help thinkin' this is how it ought to be
>Laughin' on a park bench, thinkin' to myself
>Hey, isn't this easy?
Self explanatory. Especially, the "hey, isn't this easy?" A desire to take it easy more than anyone else has ever easyed it before is a possible reason to kill yourself.

>And you've got a smile that could light up this whole town
>I haven't seen it in a while since she brought you down
>You say you're fine, I know you better than that
>Hey, what ya doin' with a girl like that?
Suicidal people tend to get happier when they make plans to kill themselves. The song's subject clearly rejected suicide, and is now miserable again. Death laments the subject's choice to "date" Life.

>I'm the one who makes you laugh, when you know you're 'bout to cry
Same concept as above. Gallows humor. Suicide is funny when you think about how sweet it's going to be.
>I know your favorite songs, and you tell me 'bout your dreams
She knows you listen to The Cure.
>Think I know where you belong, think I know it's with me
Death is increasingly showing her controlling demeanor.

Post edited on 12th Jun 2014, 6:12pm
>> No. 24142 [Edit]
>>24135
buying food from a movie theater? you must be mad!
>> No. 24143 [Edit]
>>24142
I guess I am. I find that it has a larger selection of loose weight candy, shit's expensive though.
>> No. 24144 [Edit]
Something I noticed on my drive home today.
All cars come in colors that can be divided up into 5 groups. White which is the one I noticed the most of, black and other really dark colors, silver/grey and similar looking tones like really light browns. There's variations of red and finally the very rare 'other' including yellow, pink, green, or multiple colors. For the most part it's like they made cars with modern shooter games in mind.
It's sad but there's absolutely no personality to most cars on the road unless they're somehow related to a business.
>> No. 24152 [Edit]
>>23364
The paramedics took you away in their ambulance and provided you with medical treatments 'in good faith', therefore it isn't extortion.
>> No. 24153 [Edit]
>>24152
Then they shouldn't throw a fit when you can't afford to pay their unreasonable fees.
>> No. 24160 [Edit]
File 140294621136.jpg - (65.27KB , 346x576 , Kanon_v02_Cover.jpg )
24160
Been trying to find some fair points of view about fathers' lust for their daughters (not the other way around, which is usually referred to the Electra Complex), but all I've found is christian rants (and poems!) against it plus a bit of erotica. Scholar Google results seem to focus on cases of rape and psychological treatment of the victims, rather than offering a purely analytical view on the lust itself. Maybe I should go look at the university's online catalog, for this isn't taking me anywhere.
>> No. 24164 [Edit]
>>24160
Give me some search words and I'll look it up.
>> No. 24166 [Edit]
>>24160
Try Laius complex. The object isn't specifically gendered but the phenomenon's probably the same.
>> No. 24171 [Edit]
What the hell does "edgy" mean, exactly, in the context of otaku imageboards and why is it abused ad nauseam as an insult?
>> No. 24172 [Edit]
File 140300146261.jpg - (60.06KB , 536x609 , Ecstasy.jpg )
24172
>>24171
Sort of like chuunibyou syndrome. Someone young who thinks they're dark and unique and got the world all figured out.
>> No. 24173 [Edit]
>>24171
It's another unwarranted way to call you pretentious.

You make a post that shows certain knowledge, and some people who do not have that knowledge hurt in their pride and react calling you a fake.

Notice that the people who do know about the matter and legitimately disagree with you, do not use such roundabouts and directly refute your claims instead, or at least start discussing them in appropriate terms.
>> No. 24174 [Edit]
If you don't have some activity or hobby you enjoy, if you do nothing enjoyable each day, you are effectively only waiting. Perhaps you're not depressed, but you aren't happy either. You don't actively seek to make anything occur in your life, so the next event to break the monotony will occur for reasons outside your control.

But what will that event be? You can't tell. What you can know is this asymmetry: there's no guarantee of any good events in your future, but there is a guarantee of a bad one (and high likelihood of more than one). Before you die you will probably become sick many times. Perhaps the next event will be a bout of food poisoning - you'll be vomiting into a toilet bowl wondering what the point of such suffering is when you don't really enjoy anything in life anyway. Maybe the last event will be a cancer diagnosis, or the emotional suffering that generally precedes a suicide.

So relearn how to enjoy the things you used to, or search for some new hobby you like. It can be watching anime, playing video games, bike riding, cooking, anything. If you don't, life is only monotony interspersed with periods of suffering.
>> No. 24175 [Edit]
>relearn how to enjoy the things
Sometimes it can be as simple, other times it's not. I do believe it's possible to experience a (possibly) life changing impulse, but it's insanely hard to act upon it in seclusion. That's from personal experience, anyway.

Sometimes I do wonder how healthy people can revolve around so little, when they have the means to rule the world.
>> No. 24238 [Edit]
>>24171
'edgy' is something that attempts to take unthinkable risks and push boundaries. Something almost rebellious meant to offend and invoke strong emotions in people. Problem is nothing professionally made that claims to be or tries to be edgy ever really is, it's always calculated and planed by a team of professionals who are taking anything but a risk. For example, call of duty thinks it's being edgy when they have you gun down innocent people at an airport or show a child being blown up. These are little more than crys for attention from something as generic as can be, which is what most 'edgy' things ultimately amount to. This is applicable to people as well. When called out on it many will simply act like pretentious pricks and claim no one understands them or the things they like; Much like emo/goth kids or even beatniks. As >>24172 stated 'edgy' things are typically something popular with adolescents desperate for a sense of individuality.
>> No. 24380 [Edit]
I wonder if conspiracy theory videos are made by individuals, or if there are organizations dedicated to their production.

Videos like http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xac4ao_the-arrivals-pt-03-children-s-mind_redband
for instance.
>> No. 24425 [Edit]
What's the point of getting a girl's number when you don't know anything about her? I see it a lot in tv and film but do guys really expect a girl to fuck some random stranger she's never seen just because he called her on the phone?
>> No. 24426 [Edit]
>>24425
>do guys really expect a girl to fuck some random stranger
They actually do that. Never heard of a one night stand?
>> No. 24427 [Edit]
>>24426
yeah but with a phone call you have no idea if the guy is some old ugly fatass.
>> No. 24430 [Edit]
>>24427
I'm fairly sure "getting a girl's number" means hitting on her in a bar/party/whatever and convince her to hand over her number so he can get in touch with her. I don't know, maybe everything's on facebook now.
>> No. 24624 [Edit]
Today, I think I had a revelation.
I think normals like talking to each other because they do things that give them a sense of accomplishment. And thus, they have things to talk about.

I don't like talking to people because I have no accomplishments and therefore nothing to say, and so talking to people uses up time I could be using to try and do something that makes me feel like I'm a sack of shit. However, because I am a sack of shit, it takes me an inordinate amount of time to do something and inevitably fail. And then I have nothing to talk about with people because I can't do anything.

Another day waiting to die...
>> No. 24625 [Edit]
File 140608428919.jpg - (389.16KB , 513x700 , 44463721_p2.jpg )
24625
>>24624
I don't really think "It's all boasting about your various achievements." is a very encompassing view of why people would talk to each other. Probably a kernel of truth to it though; when I last met some of my old acquaintances from school times they mostly discussed some real esoteric tech research one of them was doing for some fancy university title thesis and various get-rich-quick schemes.
But eventually things did turn to the dreaded "So what have you been up to?" which deflected things to a pleasant conversation on the latest news in Chinese cartoons, physics, and hot 2hu tips after some slightly shocking concern over me "not doing anything with my life." (Were they always the kind of people to worry about stuff like that?)

So I guess my latest singular sample of anecdotal non-evidence on social interactions in "normal people" partly does confirm that having to prove something about your undeniably high societal status and wealth might well be a very common part of the formula, but also that reasonable and potentially enlightening discussion about things and not people is likely at least somewhat commonly had.

Everyone agreed we should meet up again. Haven't seen or heard anything of anyone in well over a year once again.
Maybe next summer will be one of those. Or the one after. Or maybe not.

Hard to keep track of how many it's been lately. Maybe that was actually this year for all I know.
...
How old am I really?
Don't think about it. Just go play one of them video games or something.
>> No. 25224 [Edit]
I can't stay interested in things.
Inevitably, after a few days of doing something, I get existential about it and wonder why I'm even doing it and I lose interest. If I look up discussion about something online, this happens immediately. I think looking up stuff online ruins my interest mostly because I see all the other related things people recommend and I get overwhelmed by how arbitrary my choice of activity is.

I downloaded Touhou 13 yesterday and this already happened.
>> No. 25225 [Edit]
>>25224
Man, tell me about it...

I can't even remember the last time I finished a game / book / anime. I just lose interest way too fast these days. Everything's just so pointless.
>> No. 25323 [Edit]
Of all the kinds of people on Earth, the nouveau riche might be one of the worst.
>> No. 25324 [Edit]
>>25323
Thank god the increasing social inequality of our times and the decline of the middle class mean that those will get rarer and rarer as time goes by.
>> No. 25340 [Edit]
Why are pedophiles considered to be automatically evil? It's not like they had a choice in what they feel attracted to, I feel like it's similar to being gay.

You aren't doing anything wrong by just being attracted to children. Yet if you told normies you're a pedo, even though you would never try to act on it, majority would likely want to send you to a prison.
>> No. 25342 [Edit]
>>25340
Because Ford Drivers do not understand the difference between pedophiles and child molesters. They see the two as synonyms, and refuse to believe that it's possible to have a sexual attraction without acting on it (particularly if the person in question is male).

Psychologically speaking, the events that lead to being a pedophile are no different than the ones that create homosexuality (being born with an abnormal sexual orientation)- but trying to explain any of this, no matter how calmly or simply, will just get you labeled as a child molester or a "child molester sympathizer" in any situation involving Ford Drivers.
>> No. 25345 [Edit]
>>25340
Contrasting with homosexuality, maybe it's a PR problem more than anything. And understandably so I suppose. Removed from religious motivations it seems insane that anyone would think it a good idea to limit the freedom of adult people to have whatever kind of relationship with whatever other persons they want to (as long as none of them are against the idea) based on ultimately arbitrary notions of gender-appropriate behavior.

But factoring in all the complexity that comes with counting in non-adult people, right in the middle of the most rapid phases of development humans go through, with potentially huge individual disparity in relevant physical and mental maturity at all points, it's just nowhere near the same amount of clear-cut. So there's little chance for a really cohesive movement on the side of anything related to pedophilia to form. "Maybe don't vilify and dehumanize people based on thoughts they have that you find disturbing, because having thoughts and feelings isn't the same as acting on them." just isn't that catchy.

I suppose NAMBLA for one takes a stronger more dramatic stance than that, but even then they don't have any easy answers either, and when people get so emotional about THE CHILDREN—understandably, perhaps—calling for a complex and nuanced discussion on how any law on things like age of consent ultimately has to be somewhat arbitrary and any judgment, sex-related or not, should always be based on the individuals involved in any given case... I mean, on the face of it that premise sounds quite reasonable to me personally, with my European hyperlibrul mentally ill completely removed from reality faggot values. But man-boy, am I glad I'm never planning to try my hand at representing any part of NAMBLA's views in any official capacity, because I would obviously only be saying any of it because I want to, nay, I MUST RAPE THEIR CHILDREN.

Of course the numbers being probably notably lower (But I don't really know. Nor do I know that anyone really knows, due to the baggage of the mere question.) than homosexuality probably is also a big factor in pedophilia remaining so alien to culture at large. And I'm sure trying to build a cultural community around repressing sexuality—especially for non-religious reasons—would be a much harder proposition than one focusing on affirming and expressing a formerly maligned and forcibly repressed flavor of sexuality.

I guess it's just a dauntingly nuanced issue shadowed by a high perceived risk of CHILDREN GETTING HURT with the negatively affected a relatively tiny and fiercely—whether largely unjustly or not—vilified minority. A world where there remain a non-trivial number of people who think the color of your skin determines your moral character probably isn't collectively ready to even consider the existence of a shadow of a possibility of treating pedophiles like humans instead of monster-shaped targets, much less challenge any norms on what should be considered harmful, or indeed that non-harmful behavior could even exist within the sphere of pedophilia.
>> No. 25348 [Edit]
>>25340
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qh2sWSVRrmo
>> No. 25353 [Edit]
>>25340
>>25342
That people think attraction to and raping a child are synonymous might actually indicate that they have problems themselves. I mean, do they find it difficult to keep themselves from raping other adults? Their assumption indicates so, and that they assume everyone else has such difficulty.
I think this is what goes on in the mind of a normal:
"If I couldn't ever have sex consensually I would want to rape someone. If I could get away with it, I would do it. I am attracted to adults but if I attempt to rape one they will tell the police and/or fight back. Pedophiles can't have sex consensually, and children can be raped with less fear of being caught. If I were a pedophile I would probably rape children, so I think most/all pedophiles are child molestors."
This kind of thinking is why wise men in the past invented the idea of divine punishment. Because normals only avoid crime because they fear punishment, and they are driven by base instincts.
>> No. 25356 [Edit]
>>25340
Well in Canada it is up to the judge what is illegal and what isn't because "imaginary people are people too". That was literally the Supreme Court verdict banning lolicon. So far only a couple of people have been charged/convicted for it and they were all really asking for it (one was a reservist at work, one commissioned 10000 shota pictures with his credit card, and one tried to bring dozens of movies and doujinshi across the border). I am not a pedo or a loli viewer so I should be OK, but if they ever try to arrest me for it I will sooner kill myself than go to court/prison. I keep poison pills in my pocket everywhere I go for that purpose. Granted, I'm a bit paranoid but I have social anxiety already without being accused of what many consider the most heinous crime.
>> No. 25359 [Edit]
>>25356
He wasn't even talking about loli laws or politics or whatever.
>> No. 25360 [Edit]
>>25357
Yes, but that law is a direct consequence of people thinking that pedophilia=child molestation. The law is essentially banning people from expression of pedophilia in any way, regardless of whether it actually hurts people. It is also worth noting that the law includes literature.
>> No. 25370 [Edit]
>>25356
Not the same situation where I live, but I like to imagine I'd stand firm and calm and persuasive in the face of any obviously ridiculous accusations like that.

Kind of to a point where it looks megalomaniacally insane upon introspection. I would demonstrate to the people of the world how wrong they all are! Once and for all! For I am the most level-headed and cleverest thinker of all!
...
Anon, if they ever enact laws like that where I live, you have to mail me some of those poison pills before I say anything the entire rest of the human race will regret.
>> No. 25383 [Edit]
>>25370
My poison pills are just 15000mg of caffeine so you should probably be able to get some.I would like to imagine I would stand tall under ridicule, but really pedophiles are by far the most hated demographic and a simple accusation is a death sentence, never mind a conviction.
>> No. 25401 [Edit]
>>25383
>15000mg of caffeine
I wonder what taking that would feel like...?
>> No. 25402 [Edit]
>>25401
It would probably be a pretty painful death
>> No. 25403 [Edit]
>>25401
Internal bleeding, heart attack, seizures. Not so good.
>> No. 25527 [Edit]
File 141680375867.jpg - (59.66KB , 1208x676 , heel.jpg )
25527
While women are urged to wear heels for beauty standards, they are not pushed to use these or those heels in particular within their range of consumption. So, despite its rienced coercive origin, there is a component within the use of heels that falls legitimately within the scope of personal choice, or (just like the reader before the author) of taste before fashion as an empowerment of the individual and the recapture of some freedom. However, heels, among other historically renowned examples of women's footwear, have the indisputable feature of preventing them from walking too far or too fast: to weaken a degree of mobility and power that they'd perfectly have if not using them. Thus, beyond their cosmetic function and their problems within that scope, heels are a clear example of the possibility of means of control being effectively disguised as means of expression and thus, in general, of the fully functional but essentially fraudulent status that even the most common signs can reach...

All this except in Kill La Kill, of course.
>> No. 25528 [Edit]
>>25527
I think you're forgetting about cars. Women aren't restricted from traveling anywhere anymore than men are. It's just something for formal wear, not meant to be an everyday thing. Formal wear is always going to be impractical. In the real world women who are going to be on their feet a lot rarely wear stuff like that. It's no where near as common as anime/game/tv/movie make it seem. As with many tropes in those media it's only there because it looks good. Women don't all feel forced to wear them anymore than men feel forced to get sixpack abs simply because all the guys in the movies have them.
>> No. 25530 [Edit]
>>25527
Haven't seen Kill la Kill so maybe that makes the above moot, but are you seriously saying heels are a sign of male patriarchy?
>> No. 25531 [Edit]
>>25529
>Haven't seen Kill la Kill
Don't bother. It's nudist propaganda for casual anime fans.
>> No. 25532 [Edit]
>>25530
He's saying that they handicap themselves, but by controlling the situation they appear/feel more attractive or "cool" for lack of a better word. Like peacocks.
>> No. 25535 [Edit]
>>25532
Awesome way to put that, actually. Made me laugh.
>> No. 25548 [Edit]
Is being dishonest with yourself or others justified when some ideas and philosophies are just more intuitive and get better results?

Like, knowing what we know today, it's likely that free will does not exist, but the illusion of it is just so strong and visceral, that trying to think and act against it is counterproductive.

Or as less esoteric example: People who think, or are led to believe, that they stand for freedom and liberty, will have a much happier and productive life, even though in practice their actions don't reflect their views.

Is it justified to extend these 'personal' lies to society as a whole, for the same purpose?
>> No. 25551 [Edit]
>>25548
I would say so. Just looking at historical examples can clearly show the benefits of some degree of "free will".
>> No. 25553 [Edit]
I think the genesis for "you can't teach an old dog new tricks" comes with an increasing mental weariness to unproductive tinkering that you tend to acquire as you age, making you more inclined to use "tried and true" methods.

A while back, I was going through learning Adobe After Effects for a project, but found myself frustrated that I was not picking up the interface after a few go-arounds. Everything seemed unintuitive and unexplained. Just as I was about to go back to Sony Vegas, it occurred to me that when I was a teenager, Sony Vegas and other tools were equally unintuitive and unexplained, but I just messed with them until I found a solution. So I waited until I had a vacation to pick to dedicate my time to messing around with After Effects with Google by my side, and now its slowly becoming second nature.

I also have this conflict with GIMP and Photoshop, in that I always use GIMP because I am familiar with its quirks, but its hardly ever failed me and it is more cross-platform than Photoshop, so I find sticking to it to be worth the time-sinks in various particularities of the software.

I feel this experience highlights the necessity of experimentation, which people often try to bypass with an increasingly dated knowledge of a skill. And the more you hold out, the rougher the paradigm shift will be when and if you finally try and challenge it.
>> No. 25729 [Edit]
I watched some videos and testimonials about how it is to be "high-functioning autistic" or aspie and whatnot. From all I saw, it seems like being a perfectly average person growing up in the highly competitive, alienating and information-overloaded postmodern world, rather than any neurological or cognitive group-specific condition (apart from always using an extremely victimizing and apologetic rhetoric). They really have to try harder with that autism spectrum popularization efforts of them, cause honestly it's a bunch of crap.
>> No. 25733 [Edit]
 
>>25729
>> No. 25750 [Edit]
>>25733
Yeah, that's a legit autist, not an aspie moron.
>> No. 25751 [Edit]
File 141925360117.jpg - (70.51KB , 816x417 , De Morgan.jpg )
25751
There's something staggeringly beautiful about De Morgan laws.

They turn me on.
>> No. 25753 [Edit]
>>25751
It's their inner symmetry.
>> No. 25771 [Edit]
>>25729
Presumably these video testimonials are filmed by professionals in a manner that allows neurotypical people to relate to the individuals in question. This means mitigating the presentation of symptoms, whether by coaching or skilled filming and editing. It should not come as news to you that people permanently wear a "perception filter" that excludes some sources of information and privileges others. To publish the video without any photoshoppery will simply present a source of information that offends the viewer's perception filter, negating the purpose of the video.

>it seems like being a perfectly average person growing up in the highly competitive, alienating and information-overloaded postmodern world
>They really have to try harder with that autism spectrum popularization efforts of them, cause honestly it's a bunch of crap.
In the first you seem to be acknowledging the reality of their experience and in the second you seem to be denying it. Are you suggesting instead that they ought to be campaigning for a more sedate world to live in?
>> No. 25773 [Edit]
>>25771
I think he's saying that there's a disparity between the message and the content of these videos.
>> No. 25777 [Edit]
>>25771
No: in the first I acknowledged such gloomy lives as all of us contemporary citizens' general condition; in the second I bashed the videos presenting those hardships as aspie exclusive problems and pushing their image of a group with special needs. I don't disbelieve autism, I disbelieve aspies propaganda.

Here's one of the videos, so you can judge by yourself:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xm4LmMph1n8
>> No. 25800 [Edit]
If 2d breaks the 4th wall, does it become 3d?
>> No. 25803 [Edit]
>>25800
no it becomes 6th.
>> No. 25894 [Edit]
If heroin is so bad, why is it called hero win?
>> No. 25895 [Edit]
>>25894
It's heroine originally, like female hero.
>> No. 25896 [Edit]
>From the Ancient Greek ἥρως (hḗrōs, “hero”, “demigod”).

The ine suffix just denotes it an alkaloid - caffeine, morphine, mescaline, amphetamine etc.
>> No. 26490 [Edit]
Love isn't really that different from being hungry, but no one makes songs about people being hungry.
>> No. 26491 [Edit]
>>26490
I think that I've heard a Vocaloid song about hunger, but that was a long time ago so I'm unsure.
>> No. 26493 [Edit]
>>26491
There's also a book called hunger/sult.
Hunger is easily satiated, at least in most places, so it's easy to forget terrible it is.

But why do people feel the need to make more love songs? Are they even trying to add something new? Really, I've always thought that the melody accompanies the lyrics and theme, but it's actually the other way around: the lyrics are simply there to make the music sound better, not to convey a meaningful message or feeling. Love songs are nothing more than rhyming words and a melody, and it's no better than singing scubbedy bubbedy slabbety wabbety.
>> No. 26502 [Edit]
>>26493
I know one with a meaningful message: rack city bitch, rack rack city bitch, 10 10 10 20s on yo titties bitch...

Nevermind, I got nothing.

Post edited on 12th Mar 2015, 2:34am
>> No. 26536 [Edit]
Blind people don't see blackness, they just don't see shit.

I got to thinking about that in comparison to death.
The concept of nothingness is so lost on us that we can't understand it, or just flat refuse to believe it.
>> No. 26537 [Edit]
>>26490
There's an album by psychostick that's almost nothing but songs about food and hunger
>> No. 26556 [Edit]
File 142676095889.jpg - (77.62KB , 640x640 , TawfVdi.jpg )
26556
No wonder my motivation is so shit.
>> No. 26568 [Edit]
>>26556
Not even passion?
>> No. 26580 [Edit]
>>26568
>> No. 26596 [Edit]
I'm no stranger to convoluted language in philosophy, but Heidigger seems to be really taking the cake with his Essays in Metaphysics. I've been following alright, I feel, but it's a real chore to read through some of this shit.
>> No. 26597 [Edit]
>>26556
This venn diagram bugs me because the bubbles on the opposites can't be combined without atleast one of the other attributes.
Consider that you could be great at something the world needs and not be love or get paid for it.
>> No. 26600 [Edit]
File 142697221952.jpg - (344.97KB , 750x993 , tumblr_nesyfkM9oq1r0mzk1o2_1280.jpg )
26600
I think my life was more interesting when i didn't have a job and was neet. endless "free" time and no money led to creative efforts to entertain myself.

But in saying that, the constant burden of worrying about my future is lifted. Now I just need to figure out what to do with myself.
>> No. 26606 [Edit]
File 142708918042.gif - (223.44KB , 512x512 , 1424649327573.gif )
26606
>>26600
I'm in the other boat at the moment. I'm dying to get a job. Nothing is fun any more, all I can think about while whittling away my time on games and anime is how unsure my financial future is. Sucks the fun out of everything.
>> No. 26608 [Edit]
>>26606
>I'm dying to get a job. Nothing is fun any more

That sounds like me. I've applied for jobs but I'm still scared. I mean, what am I supposed to do if I get a job? Shovel dirt around, pass groceries though a checkout and shit like that? I don't know.
>> No. 26623 [Edit]
>>26600
And I'm in the third situation of having a mind-numbing job that doesn't pay enough to actually move out. So I work all day hating my job then watch anime all night while this feeling of helplesness eats away at me.
>> No. 28006 [Edit]
Testicles are outside of the body because body-heat kills sperm right? So if you dunk your junk in warm/hot water for a few minutes before getting freaky would that negate the need for birth control?
>> No. 28007 [Edit]
>>26580
Is doing this just a way to say "yes" or "I agree with this post" nowadays?
>> No. 28008 [Edit]
>>28007
word son
>> No. 28009 [Edit]
>>28006
The question Im more interested in is why the sperm making machinery didn't simply just evolve to work at a higher temperature
>> No. 28201 [Edit]
>>25353
Scum normies being unable to conceive of the idea that sexual arousal does not translate into "I want to do this. I should do this if I'm ever able to" isn't that hard to imagine. I've seen loads of statements and sentiments that seem to indicate it from some of them.
>> No. 29023 [Edit]
Do transformers get car insurance or life insurance?
>> No. 29025 [Edit]
Is the only way to remain with pure intentions to have the mentality of a herd-like farm animal?
Existentialist emptiness and corruption abound
>> No. 29081 [Edit]
Why do people come back from baby changing stations with the same baby?
>> No. 30132 [Edit]
Why do people like Steve Jobs so much? People act like he's some revolutionary hero who changed the world and idolize him as such. Far as I know he was just the face of a company that produced overpriced fashionable electronics designed for morons.
>> No. 30141 [Edit]
Is death the end? What happens to our personalities, our memories, our thoughts, our feelings, our experiences and our sentience when we die?
>> No. 30142 [Edit]
>>30141
I don't believe in gods in the traditional sense or an afterlife, but I do sometimes wonder if our consciousness is like an electrical field or something and our mind lives on after our body dies.
>> No. 30144 [Edit]
>>30141
They simply die with your brain, presumably.

I would like to believe in the concept of a soul or something similar, but I honestly doubt anything like it exists.
>> No. 30574 [Edit]
File 150681560625.jpg - (100.51KB , 1280x720 , [DmonHiro] Fate Kaleid Liner 01.jpg )
30574
Do ojousama exist in reality? Just about every anime character type has it's real world counterpart it's based on, but are ojousama actually a thing? I've never seen or heard of one outside of anime. Real world rich people are fucking lame.
>> No. 30576 [Edit]
>>30575
That's what I mean though. I know real people aren't as two dimensional as anime characters in personality, but you can still draw some parallels to the type of people they're based on, be it book worms or tomboys. With ojou vs real world stuck up rich skanks they're miles apart. It makes me wonder what ojousama are actually based on.
Real world rich women are slutty cunts who get shit faced drunk at parties around the world, and take part in drug fueled sex orgies with strangers while breaking every law in the book, knowing they'll get bailed out by daddy. How did it even become a thing to represent rich women as eccentric 18th century style debutantes? I'm not complaining, but it is a pretty big leap.
>> No. 30578 [Edit]
>>30577
>that aren't really present in the west.
Aren't most ojou in anime represented as being foreigners though?
>> No. 30585 [Edit]
>>30574
>>30576
Technically yes, they do. I'm relatively sure the ojou-sama laugh comes from the stereotypical French laugh "oh hon hon hon" (Male example; 3D Warning - https://youtu.be/0Mz88TYuBn4) which is why it's almost invariably a western-looking person. It's also possible this was a common thing decades ago (Female example; Wizard of Oz; 3D Warning - https://youtu.be/btPfmWrS6AY) and it just extrapolated from there to represent rich people who look down on others.
>>30575
You're partially right. A lot of stereotypes are based upon constant anecdotes and a lot of people are quite one-dimensional in their behaviour. Tsunderes are very much a thing in real life, for example.
>> No. 30675 [Edit]
File 150824716998.png - (2.58MB , 1149x1223 , lawrence.png )
30675
If Spice and Wolf was set in modern times, Lawrence Kraft would be a truck driver.
>> No. 30676 [Edit]
>>30675
So American adaptation of Spice and Wolf would be... Smokey and the Bandit?
>> No. 30686 [Edit]
>>30675
Maybe, but your average truckers don't buy or sell the products they move. They just get paid to move things for a transport company. Said transport company meanwhile would be contracted by people like Lawrence to move his products for him. It's not unlikely though that he would buy his own truck to transport his own goods, but those trucks are expensive as fuck unlike a wood cart. Those trucks cost as much as houses, so it's more practical to pay for the transit so you can use that saved time to arrange other deals.
>> No. 30701 [Edit]
File 15085657395.jpg - (43.92KB , 720x480 , [project-gxs] Bamboo Blade - 15 [10bit DVD 480p] [.jpg )
30701
How often do they drain pools in Japanese schools? Is this like a weekly or monthly thing? Never really thought about this till I got myself a house with a pool, but draining and filling a pool can be a real pain in the butt. The cost of all the water needed to fill one can be pretty high depending on your location.
>> No. 30702 [Edit]
 
>>30701
You are supposed to use chemicals and natural additives to control the scum, and cover it in the fall and winter months from debris.

draining and filling a pool to clean it shouldn't be necessary, I wonder if the Japanese don't use filtration or chlorine?
>> No. 30707 [Edit]
>>30701
our perception of japanese school life is probably pretty skewed. i doubt students get locked in the PE shed or attacked by youkai in IRL japanese school nearly as often as anime would lead us to believe. the pool cleaning thing might be overemphasized
>> No. 30713 [Edit]
File 150884538427.png - (161.22KB , 1396x1003 , image-20160411-6225-19epmm5.png )
30713
I was just now thinking about the trolley ethics problem. The one with five people on one track and one person on the other. It occurred to me, the obvious answer isn't to take the track with the one worker, it's to stay on the track with the five workers. Five workers means the people on that track are five times more likely to notice your trolley and get the fuck out of the way. The one guy on the other track might not hear/see you due to whatever he's doing and doesn't have a buddy or two with him to say "hey dude, a trolley is coming to fuck yo shit up bra, mights wanna move ya know". I guess part of the issue involves having a level of trust in your fellow man, you trusting them and them trusting each other to have their backs. Besides, if one or more see the trolley and run without helping the other workers, their death is on that dipshits hands not yours. What's he gonna do, say something like "yeah sure I ran, but like, well, shit, you should have gone down the other track and killed Jerry over there, you jackass." ?
>> No. 30714 [Edit]
>>30713
An interesting take but what kills utilitarianism for me is the simplicity of it, and that it's based on silly utopianism where humans are rational, objective, and universalist.

If it's a group of five old people already on death's door vs a small child that really changes the game. Same for if it's five strangers vs a person I really care about. Or five crack whores vs one upstanding citizen? Evil? Wrong? Maybe. But in the real world nobody gives a shit about people outside their in-group. Just look at how the normies treated us as kids. Shoved us down so they could stand on our backs. Altruism truly is a mental disease.
>> No. 30716 [Edit]
>>30702
>You are supposed to use chemicals and natural additives to control the scum
Yeah, and scrub the remaining scum from the pool while it's still full of water using really long brushes. I don't know much about Olympic sized pools, but I can say that residential ones should only need to be drained for repairs or resurfacing.
>> No. 30718 [Edit]
The more you feel, the less you think.
The more you think, the less you feel for others.
>> No. 30720 [Edit]
>>30713
Wasn't the problem's sole purpose was to determine whether you would actively sacrifice one person to save five others? Stuff like screaming to warn them or other realistic ways to solve the problems (like yours) weren't actually asked, I think.

>>30714
>what kills utilitarianism for me is the simplicity of it
The main rule of it is simple, yes but its application can be complicated as fuck. Utilitarians do consider stuff like age, expected life span, use for others.
They would have to save the child. If there aren't other situation-changing aspects, you would have to sacrifice the person you love for the strangers and it would be your duty if you were an utilitarian. Crack whores are interesting because you would have to ask how long they'll live if they don't change their ways, what contribution they give to the greater good etc. and compare it to the same of that upstanding citizen.
Also probably funny for some is that you'd have to do nothing if the one person was a doctor or something similar and would save more than five lives.

In my opinion utilitarianism (or rather consequentialism) still makes the most sense but yeah, you do have a point with most people only caring about the people/groups close to them and the idealistic image they have of humans. As I see it that's not a problem with utilitarianism but rather with humanity itself. Like with probably every other ethical theory they have to make a system which proposes someone with a way to do the right thing and if everyone started following it, it would make the world a lot better.
I mean what (reasonable) ethical system could you possibly create if you take most people's nature into account?
>> No. 30727 [Edit]
>>30720
>Wasn't the problem's sole purpose was to determine whether you would actively sacrifice one person to save five others?
Indeed. It's pointless to think of other solutions because it's not part of the exercise.
>> No. 30908 [Edit]
I like to imagine what life would be like if dinos still existed. Maybe dinosaur meat would be popular, I suppose it must taste a little like chicken. Maybe knights would ride dinosaurs rather than horses into battle. Texan rodeos would feature cowboys riding dinos rather than bulls. Maybe there could be domesticated breeds of dinos, meant to be pets and/or livestock.
>> No. 31297 [Edit]
"It's all down hill from here."
I don't understand this phrase. It means that things will only get worse from this point on. Generally speaking when you're traveling down hill it makes the journey easier. It's easier to walk down hill, a bike can coast down hill, a car will use almost no fuel going down hill. More often than not going down hill is a good thing. The only instances I can think of in which going down hill is a bad thing are when you're falling or loose control of your vehicle, or stock prices. I doubt these are what the term originates from, so it's confusing.

"I slept like a baby"
This is another phrase I don't understand. It suggests you had a good long sleep and are well rested. Infants however do not yet posses proper sleep rhythms and will wake at random hours crying and screaming. Likewise parents of newborns apparently do not get much sleep during the first few years of raising a child.
>> No. 31298 [Edit]
>>31297
>I doubt these are what the term originates from
Why?

>Infants however do not yet posses proper sleep rhythms and will wake at random hours crying and screaming.
Probably more about the impression a sleeping baby makes in the arms of its mother or something. Them being safe, comfortable etc.
>> No. 31299 [Edit]
>>31298
Because one would assume it would refer to the common way in which people interact with downhill slopes and doesn't seem like it would become popular if it was something people couldn't related to, unless falling down hill or declining stocks were common when the phrase was created.
>> No. 31304 [Edit]
>>31297
I always thought "down hill" was more like veering of a cliff and bouncing down hill while getting destroyed, not actually going down a road downwards from a hill.
>> No. 31305 [Edit]
>>31304
But would you actually say "it's all downhill from here" while getting destroyed? Or would it be more likely for someone to say it while riding bikes with a friend?
>> No. 31306 [Edit]
>>31305
All I'd think while tumbling on a death roll would be "Shimattaaaaaa" and I don't know how to ride a bike, so no clue about the latter.
>> No. 31456 [Edit]
Why aren't hamster wheels for dogs a thing? Seems like it'd be more practical than paying a dog walker.
>> No. 31459 [Edit]
>>31456
I think you're supposed to take dogs outside also to do their excretory business, socialize and sightsee, more than only exercise. Also dogs can end up weighting a lot on the bigger side, so you'd need a massive, heavy and sturdy construct to serve as an exercise wheel for them, which by default would cost a prohibitive amount of money.
>> No. 31470 [Edit]
>>31459
So they should only be used with small dogs with a TV installed?
>> No. 31493 [Edit]
The true key to success is having rich parents. Any fool can do well in life if he comes from the background that facilitates him along that path. 99% of problems can be solved with enough cash. Rich fuckups can afford second chances, and no hole is too much to dig yourself out of, so long as your pockets are deep enough.

Money is everything.
>> No. 31494 [Edit]
>>31493
>The true key to success is having rich parents. Any fool can do well in life if he comes from the background that facilitates him along that path.
Usually yes, but not always. My own father is rich and he's rich because he's selfish and greedy to the extent of putting money before his own family. He never cared about me, my mother, or any of the women he was with after they split up. While I was driving a beat up decommissioned police car from auction to my minimum wage dead end job, he was buying Ferrari and Corvette and traveling the world. Never much mattered to him how much I tried to help him when he needed me, never cared about putting me in danger or how much I was struggling with life. I'd take time off work and break my back to help him fix up one of the dozens of homes he owns, only for him to randomly tell me he's not going to leave me a cent when he dies. To this day he seems to enjoy bragging and rubbing his wealth in my face so I've given up on him and haven't spoken to him in a year. Last I heard he was buying a plane or some shit and I hope he flies into a mountain.
>> No. 31495 [Edit]
>>31494
>only for him to randomly tell me he's not going to leave me a cent when he dies
Man, I thought my insane religious father was bad.
>> No. 31511 [Edit]
Seeing this universe as being under the wing of some evil entity, Satan, the Demiurge, Yog-Sothoth, as bleak as it is, still offers more comfort than approaching this question through a more "rational" lens of chance and casualty, as it means that in the infinite pool of possibilities born out of the chaos of chance, it all naturally converges to evil, to suffering and to death. The very building blocks of existence are tainted with this depravity.
>> No. 31519 [Edit]
>>31511
>it means... it all naturally converges to evil, to suffering and to death.
It absolutely doesn't. Death as a concept is an inevitability so in the end isn't affected by chance. Suffering seeing in the most rational sense is born from expectations that are not met or violated, so it's not affected by chance, events that lead to suffering are, but the feeling itself is human, not universal. Finally, evil is a choice that stems from depravity, ignorance or genetics. To say that the current existence of evil on Earth is to be blamed on probability is nothing short of the grandest denial of collective responsibility that we can argue for. Evil can be weeded out and exterminated, but there's little interest when the people on the top profit from it, the people at the bottom are to miserable to care, and the people in the middle are perpetually (and wilfully) distracted.
>> No. 31521 [Edit]
>>31494
how did he get wealthy enough to buy cars and planes
>> No. 31522 [Edit]
>>31521
Far as I can gather from his brother, he's been twisted in the head since childhood. He never had friends even as a kid and started small by stealing stuff from his first job to re-sell. Then onto reselling bikes. Then flipping cars as he got older. I guess there weren't enough opportunities for him in Jersey so he packed his things and went to California. Bought a catering truck and muscled his way into the business getting more trucks and hiring employes while taking out the competition by whatever means necessary. Sometimes this meant sabotaging rival food trucks, other times it meant beating the shit out of rival drivers over prime spots. Then he decided to sell the business, which apparently tanked as soon as he handed it over. The buyer as well as his former employees who were now out of jobs all wanted him dead. From there he went into flipping houses while still doing cars on the side and eventually got more houses which he started to rent out. At one point he owned a dozen or so hours worth 250k each while renting them for $1,200 a month each. Now that he's old and doesn't feel he has much time left, so he's selling the houses one by one and burning the money on trips around the world, cars, planes ect. Where he used to buy things for resale, now he only buys them to collect or play around with.

To this day his entire family hates his guts, he doesn't have any friends, and the only reason he has a woman in his life is because, well, you know how women are. Money or not however, Those women have hated him. His current one has cancer and he has commented on how gross and depressing she is now and can't wait to find a much younger replacement once she's dead. His last one hates his his guts for talking her into selling her family home.
Unfortunately due to laws and regulations I can't realistically follow in the food truck business even if I wanted to, and buying houses to resell/rent sounds very appealing but the cost of houses have gone up massively since his time.
I won't be able to pay off the one I'm in now for another 10-20 years at best. Having to take care of my gambling addicted and borderline mentally challenged mother doesn't help much. She's a drain on our finances and hinders my attempts at making money while pushing for her own moronic ideas that never pan out.
I can't say my father hasn't worked hard for the things he has though, even if it meant breaking laws and bones along the way. I've always thought his way of doing things and his life style was wrong. But here I am, someone who couldn't dream of hurting another person or taking advantage of them and who's tried to convince this guy there's more to life than just money. Yet I've been forced to live my life friendless and alone, distend to die poor and miserable as a wizard. Makes me think maybe he wasn't so wrong after all if being kind and fair has gotten me kicked around all my life and left with nothing. Meanwhile hurting, abusing, and manipulating people has left him with everything he could ever want.

Post edited on 21st Apr 2018, 2:37am
>> No. 31523 [Edit]
>>31519
This is just nitpicking and semantics, unless you are really trying to convince me animals do not experience suffering because you see it as a concept.

Taking away from others is tantamount to evil. Your very basic sustenance is grounded on the act of murder. Every creature alive is condemned to be tormented in any way that makes itself opportune. Evil can't be exterminated insofar life itself can't be exterminated, it's ingrained into everything from microorganisms to societies as a macrostructure. There's nothing the sort of the political game of interests keeping it from being achieved, it stays a constant.
>> No. 31524 [Edit]
>>31522
there has to be something between being a greedy misanthrope who only interacts with people to victimize them and being a "nice" person who tries to be a decent person and only ends up getting taken advantage of. it sure don't seem like it sometime though.
maybe you can take advantage of your current situation by announcing somewhere that greedy women look on the internet that your old, rich father is about to be single again and then selling his contact info to them
>> No. 31598 [Edit]
File 152682587412.png - (4.99KB , 698x336 , Untitled.png )
31598
How much mass would be needed to fill up the oceans and lakes to current sea level? Is there enough material for it to be possible?

If we flatten Earth, how much will the ground and sea level rise and/or decrease?
>> No. 31599 [Edit]
>>31598
thats pretty simple math, you can look up all the necessary numbers to do to calculation yourself.
>> No. 31611 [Edit]
temperate controlled, fluid filled daki
>> No. 31612 [Edit]
>>31611
It would be pretty inconvenient if the daki started leaking
>> No. 31613 [Edit]
>>31612
That just means you're making your waifu wet.
>> No. 31614 [Edit]
I was reading Katawa Shojo. There's this scene where Shizune talks how Hanako doesn't really love chess because she knows so little about chess. The logic being if you really love something you should know more about it and share it to make a connection with other people. And that makes me think if I don't really love anime and manga. That I only like them because they make me feel good. Maybe that's true.
>> No. 31798 [Edit]
We all know youtube is full of fear mongering videos about the world ending, the next dark age, or what have you. My thought is, aren't the people who make these sort of videos essentially terrorists? I mean they're trying to spread fear on a large scale and get people into a panic, right?
>> No. 31799 [Edit]
File 154041138868.jpg - (86.81KB , 567x699 , sharo.jpg )
31799
>>31614
I love to learn about and share what I've learned and thought about anime and manga. For some time I thought that maybe I don't like them for themselves as much as I thought, and what I really liked was sharing my knowledge, and receiving more in return through either discussion or research. But I've come to think that that's only an aspect of how love is expressed, rather than the love itself. Whether a feeling is held or expressed, it's still there. There's no need to doubt the love you have, regardless of the careless words of others.
>> No. 31927 [Edit]
>>31798
Yes, but the same goes for people who say ">tfw ywn" with the feels guy next to it. All forms of that are fear mongering in a certain 1984ish way.
>> No. 31930 [Edit]
>>24380
This will sound like a conspiracy theory itself, but there’s FUD spread by organizations, definitely. It depends on the video.
>> No. 31933 [Edit]
File 154653895316.png - (707.13KB , 600x837 , 72479783_p0.png )
31933
Man, these new year pixiv pictures are so nice.
>> No. 31934 [Edit]
File 154674780828.jpg - (289.57KB , 778x1200 , Dv7Lu3tUYAAVgMk.jpg )
31934
>>31933
Very much so. I've been thinking though, I haven't seen anything from Etotama this year, I liked Uri-tan. Though I suspect many have forgotten the series since.
>> No. 32042 [Edit]
I've been drawing an image a day since late December last year. I am seeing improvement but the more I improve the more my motivation fades and the more effort I have to focus on art and the more time I think about it. Why bother? There are thousands of good artists now, nothing I make will contribute much. I don't even have any amazing ideas or projects anyway, my only ideas are military anime girls and some lewd things I won't say, while these are relatively obscure they have all been done before and are still being done all the time. Would I even view my own images in the same way if I got to there level? Would getting to their level bring down how I see their art works? These thoughts are far too distracting, I have barely been watching anime, playing games or reading.
>> No. 33647 [Edit]
Do animals have souls?
>> No. 33650 [Edit]
>>33647
Do humans have souls?
>> No. 33651 [Edit]
What is the purpose of living? Is it to perform finite tasks with no ultimate goal until death? IS THERE an ultimate goal possible for a finite creature? Is the purpose of life to find peace within nothingness during life, to find peace within the act of not doing anything? Is it to unravel the secret of immortality, to become an infinite being? Is procreation a true immortality, or does one really and truly end with their own death? How can I take it easy again, when this existential crisis bothers me more every day? Why do I feel a need to DO anything? Why am I no longer satisfied with following my impulses every day as I surf the web meaninglessly, oblivious to worries of time or death? Why can't I take it easy?
>> No. 33653 [Edit]
>>33647
>>33650
What is a soul?
>> No. 33654 [Edit]
>>33651
I never got this. For me, life justifies itself, since if decent it's miles better to being death.
I never needed a superior reason, never understood the existencial crisis concept.
All the problems I ever had could have been solved with having more money. With time and money I can't possibly be unhappy because I would be too entertained for that.
I guess it's one of the advantages of being dumb.
>> No. 33655 [Edit]
>>33651
You need to believe in a metaphysical framework first before you can ask the purpose of humans. For example, I am just a hard materialist who believe life comes about accidentally and humans are just a product of natural selection. I don't believe in purpose the same way a Christian do. I see purpose simply in a practical sense. What satisfies the brain and nervous system is good, what hurts it is bad. There is no reason why it's the way it is. We just evolve that way. Note that I use the word "satisfy" instead of simple pain and pleasure so what exactly satisfy constitute is open to interpretation. The pursuit of these simple values is our purpose. How you fulfill this purpose is extremely flexible whether you want to drown in cheap entertainment or become a monk. If you don't feel that you receive satisfaction in one lifestyle, you should figure out what could do so and try it out. Yeah, my views is really common and most people in the modern world probably believe something along the same lines. It's literally "My purpose in life is to find a purpose" tier platitude but I believe it is the most parsimonious belief since anything else would have to resort to immaterial or spiritual assumptions.
>> No. 33656 [Edit]
>>33651
There is no intrinsic purpose to living, purpose is a construct of the individual. Most people however will never find a real purpose, that's okay, you don't need a purpose in order to live.
>> No. 33658 [Edit]
>>33655
I, the original poster, do have the same materialistic view as you, which is why I ask those questions. As someone who feels a necessity for purpose, yet knows there is not intrinsic purpose, it frustrates me to no end that I must exist finitely and without meaning for the few precious days until death.
>> No. 33660 [Edit]
>>33654
>since if decent it's miles better to being death.
On what basis do you make this comparison?
>> No. 33665 [Edit]
>>33660
Well, I can't do absolutely anything I like while being death.
>> No. 33666 [Edit]
>>33665
But if you're dead there is no urge to do anything in the first place.
>> No. 33674 [Edit]
>>33658
I think what seperates life-loving, normal, unwashed cattle types from those with existential crisis is how much you think about certain things, overanalyzing, and looking at too big a picture. If you don't beloeve in that baseless assertion of "Unexamined life is not worth living", then maybe being more thoughtless can make you happier.

Stop thinking about purpose and whatnot. Get busy. Worry about short term things like your job, project, or that event in mmo that you want to grind for. Jump to another meaningless, petty, worldly goals after you're done with one. Maybe you'll become one of those workaholic who works his while life and is already on his deathbed by the time he realizes it. I am still trying to see if it works but it's sonethink to think of.
>> No. 33675 [Edit]
>>33674
>I think what seperates life-loving, normal, unwashed cattle types from those with existential crisis is how much you think about certain things, overanalyzing, and looking at too big a picture.

There isn't anything that separates them, they are the same. Most 'unwashed cattle types' have existential crisis and are miserable, suicide and mental health are big issues among the people now. People on sites like this just like to feel special and enlightened in some way but they are not. If anything what separates them from the people that actually kill themselves is the attachments they have, if you have a job and a family living on your income then it becomes harder to kill yourself, hence why most people that do kill themselves either are young and don't have kids or are middle aged and their kids have grown up.
>> No. 33676 [Edit]
OK who let the ford sympathizers in? Disgusting.
>> No. 33677 [Edit]
>>33674
>>33675
>>33676
All of you have it so wrong it hurts. The spectrum of normalfaggotry isn't defined by depression or how bad your exestential crises are or even whether you have a job of not. If it were, all those unemployed and clinically diagnosed with depression would belong here. Those things just loosely correlate with not being a normalfag. Normalfaggotry is more defined by a conformity-first mindset and certain attitudes.
>> No. 33678 [Edit]
>>33677
I agree with you, I'm just remembering how it was in wizardchan, were normalfaggotry was determined by how much you were able to still enjoy things. So having hobbies and interests, specially the autistic/nerd ones, was quickly condemned.
It totally looked like a bunch of angsty teens competing for who was more depressed than the other and how much they hated things.
At the end, if normalfag meant being happy and not a normalfag meant being unhappy you could easily reach the conclusion that being a normal was just plain better. And that's awfully wrong.
If something, it's more normal not being able to enjoy things than social recognition, having crisis "when no gf" and all that kind of shit, while the unnormal is more like Dwarf Fortress guy, who can obsess and enjoy doing one autistic thing all his life just because it's fun.
>> No. 33679 [Edit]
>>33678
Any place where people can't be shamelessly passionate about something is not worth being in. A big part of normalfaggotry is reeling in your interests, either in content or intensity, so as to not diverge from what's considered acceptable. Even among people who do seem "abnormal" on the surface, like those on wizardchan or some incel forum or who go to anime conventions, have the same mindset. Instead of revelling in how society sees you because of whatever you lack that's considered valuable, it's better to simply reject society's value scale.

Post edited on 17th Nov 2019, 4:40am
>> No. 33682 [Edit]
>>33677
>>33679
>Normalfaggotry is more defined by a conformity-first mindset and certain attitudes.
I think this is a good characterization. They have an unconscious tendency towards conformity (either not realizing this action, or justifying it based on some superficial reason). This is usually accompanied by a desire to jostle for social prominence, which probably is in and of itself the primary distinguisher. Most actions are carried out towards that end: "watching anime" is not merely a comforting medium to be enjoyed in solitude but rather perverted into a competition to see who can be the most outspoken "weeb," overtly marking oneself as part of some supposed trendy in-group. Going to anime conventions becomes merely an avenue for partying with friends.
>> No. 33686 [Edit]
>>33682
That's what exactly is. And that's what always bothered me of people. At the end it's all about socializing, even with weirdos, it all ends in the same. And I think females are probably 100% about that while some males can show some genuine appreciation, but social pressure makes them cynical.
>> No. 33956 [Edit]
File 157786186092.jpg - (39.86KB , 700x600 , 20191222.jpg )
33956
Advertising is bad.. mmkay?
http://jacek.zlydach.pl/blog/2019-07-31-ads-as-cancer.html
https://www.stuartmcmillen.com/comic/litter-on-a-stick/
>> No. 34620 [Edit]
File 158714550564.jpg - (93.95KB , 640x904 , nytjtkdg8jq41.jpg )
34620
Empathy and kindness are bad predictors of trustworthiness and selflessness. Both of those things are spontaneous, inconsistent and fleeting. A person with those traits might also be less aware of their own action's selfishness. They may have a tendency to spin their actions in a way that seems morally acceptable to them. If it feels right, it is right to them. When strong feelings are a person's main captain, they're more likely to act selfishly.

Better predictors of trustworthiness are conscientiousness and stoicism. A person who is not concerned about their own pleasure or pain, but cares about diligence and honesty is way more dependable. How sweet or warm they are doesn't really matter. Those things are superficial and don't actually have much to do with a person's long-term actions. Maybe a person can be both sweet and trustworthy, but sweetness on its own doesn't tell you anything and can be misleading.

Post edited on 17th Apr 2020, 10:48am
>> No. 34621 [Edit]
File 158715174856.jpg - (266.09KB , 877x1240 , bbfd551af9e551a7dde12842f24036b2-imagejpeg.jpg )
34621
>>34620
Both are as fleeting as empathy and kindness. The only good indicator of trustworthiness is loyalty.
>> No. 34622 [Edit]
>>34621
I don't think loyalty is a personality trait or temperament. Temperament isn't fleeting. Personal relationships aren't built on militaristic principles.

Post edited on 17th Apr 2020, 1:10pm
>> No. 34638 [Edit]
If a person wants to be interesting, he needs to show things of interest. But if the things of interest are so interesting, there's no need for attention for that person.
>> No. 34873 [Edit]
File 158843883637.jpg - (3.41MB , 1253x1770 , 89d1cff4f0a4bf87511a85712d97a4ee.jpg )
34873
If all over the world, machines appeared that could produce an endless amount of exact copies of you, with only the press of a button, how do you think the world and you would be affected?
>> No. 34874 [Edit]
File 158844122892.jpg - (35.55KB , 600x591 , nowneitherofuswillbevirgins.jpg )
34874
>>34873
Uhm.
>> No. 34875 [Edit]
>>34873
I'd imagine for most people, the thought of having more than one of them existing at any time would be cool at first, but then incredibly unnerving. They would all eventually start to turn on one another and commit mass murder, until one was left standing, who would then proclaim themselves to be the "true" one.

In my case, I'd hardly imagine anything other than the opposite. I've thought about it, and if I were a clone, I'd probably come to terms with that fact. The problem more or less is that I've essentially been spat out onto the world with nothing onto a lazy mind and unfit body. Clones of me would essentially fill up homeless shelters, as they largely lack the self-confidence to work. Eventually, a breaking point would be hit and the clones would all start committing mass suicide. The only ones I'd ever see are the ones that are close enough to where I live, and a few of which may or may not ever try to take my place, in which case I'd probably just shoot them since I'm the only one with a gun. My clones would probably just be sick of eachother, so I can't imagine any sort of "mass uprising", and the clone experiment would be chalked up to a total failure and completely shelved until the whole world forgets about the incident or rationalizes it.
I wonder what sort of person you'd clone to get a "clone utopia". I vaguely remember a chapter in Kino's Journey where Kino comes across this place filled with clones of the same two people (A man and woman) who live in what seemed to be relative harmony. They even had the smarts to avoid getting wiped out by some military strike.
>> No. 34876 [Edit]
>>34874
>>34875
I was thinking more human slavery and cannibalism, but this works too.
>> No. 34877 [Edit]
>>34876
That'd never happen with today's values. Maybe in the past, but nowadays there'd be clone's rights activists who'd parade that the non-clones should have less rights than the clones.
>> No. 34878 [Edit]
>>34877
Plenty of people don't hold those values.
>> No. 34880 [Edit]
>>34877
>>34878
I'm going to be honest with you, I don't really understand how people could consider clones less than humans unless they were somehow biologically different from humans. I mean, sex is just the process of taking sperm and putting it in an egg, isn't a clone of you just a twin? Unless they had some sort of mental modifications to make them like slavery or whatever, they wouldn't be any less human. Unless you believe slavery in general is fine, which may be a valid point, then you're basically just using semantics to justify something that doesn't actually make sense in the real world. It's just an argument that never made sense to me, a clone of yourself would be in actuality more human to you than someone of another race or just of the same race with lower intelligence. In fact to me my clone would be the most valuable and rights-deserving person in the world besides myself. The whole point of blade runner was that society was using semantics and the circumstances of the birth of real, sentient humans to do mental gymnastics and justify enslaving and killing people who had just as much a "soul" as they did. I don't personally have a problem with slavery in general, or even slavery based on the type of person being enslaved, but enslaving someone who is a higher lifeform along the same lines as yourself, a person who is much more genetically and intellectually valuable than many "people" in the world is just a waste of resources. If I was gonna clone and enslave someone, I wouldn't enslave myself. I would clone and enslave someone already worthy of slavery.
>> No. 34882 [Edit]
File 158846541453.jpg - (1.16MB , 1494x1054 , 6a8425fe72993b501d7fa9520406dd26.jpg )
34882
>>34880
You're missing the point of scenario. A bunch of clone making machines appearing out of nowhere all over the world and requiring no resources. At least a good number of people would use their clones of you for inhumane purposes because it would cost them nothing to make more.
>> No. 34883 [Edit]
>>34873
Who controls the cloning machines though? Me? Someone else?
>> No. 34884 [Edit]
>>34882
I would use my army of hyper-intelligent clones to take over the world because I'm not foolish like those people.

Post edited on 2nd May 2020, 8:12pm
>> No. 34893 [Edit]
>>34883
Whoever gets to them first and can move them around.
>> No. 34962 [Edit]
File 158922319053.jpg - (1.13MB , 937x1300 , 81471533_p0.jpg )
34962
I wonder, about the Miranda rights. If the cops tell you that you can remain silent, otherwise what you say could be used against you, and then they ask you if you understand, what are the possible answer that can be used? Like if you say you understand, you're abdicating of the right to reaming silent by providing them with information that can be used against you later, when they say "He said very clearly that he had understood his right to silence". If you do say that you do not understand you also abdicate of this right, but then the cops theoretically have to say it over and over, and you may get something out of it. But they could also use that against you, like saying "He pretended not to understand and tried to piss the police off" or something. The right thing seems to be saying nothing. This way they can't know if you understood or not, and theoretically you could use this for future attacks on a court of law, afterwards.
>> No. 34963 [Edit]
>>34962
I don't think they care if you respond or not.
>> No. 34964 [Edit]
>>34962
I don't think there's any legal holes in something as common as the Miranda Rights. As long as they've told them before questioning nobody would probably give a shit.
>> No. 34975 [Edit]
File 158942948368.jpg - (100.34KB , 1200x1200 , are_we_there.jpg )
34975
Not exactly pondering. I just hope we get there soon.
>> No. 34976 [Edit]
>>34873
I'd like to think the world would be a much more peaceful place if nothing else.
>> No. 35317 [Edit]
If insects and spiders had human faces, but were otherwise the same, would you have a harder time killing them? If lobsters had human faces, would you still eat them?
>> No. 35318 [Edit]
>>35317
>If insects and spiders had human faces

I would be extremely terrified of them?
Hiruko The Goblin had spiders with human heads and it was the stuff of nightmares.
>> No. 35319 [Edit]
>>34975
We're getting closer (in America).
>> No. 35321 [Edit]
>>35319
Against who, exactly?
>> No. 35322 [Edit]
>>35321
Hair salons and barbers shops.
>> No. 35323 [Edit]
>>35322
What they have done?
>> No. 35324 [Edit]
>>35323
What haven't they done? They overrcharge, they spread disease, and there's nothing they do which you can't at home for free.
>> No. 35325 [Edit]
>>35324
>During medieval times, barbers performed surgery on customers, as well as tooth extractions. The original pole had a brass wash basin at the top (representing the vessel in which leeches were kept) and bottom (representing the basin that received the blood). The pole itself represents the staff that the patient gripped during the procedure to encourage blood flow.
>> No. 35332 [Edit]
>>35321
Against anyone who won't bend the knee to the New Kulture™ built by the corporate tyranny megablob, unfortunately. It should have been the other way around.
>> No. 35333 [Edit]
>>34638
In reality, normalfags don't like someone because he's "interesting". They like someone because he can "vibe well" in casual conversation. Nothing else matters, a quantum physicist with any shyness or introversion is less valuable to socializing people than an 80IQ wigger because he can't seamlessly engage in mindless chit chat, and for no other reason. Looking for self-aware reason or motive in the social world is wasting your time.
>> No. 35334 [Edit]
>>35333
>like someone because he can "vibe well" in casual conversation
This is the key. Most people don't strike up conversations with such lofty goals as "learning about others" or "being interested in sharing knowledge" – at best they do it because they want to pass the time, ingratiate themselves to you, or make a good impression for some future favor; at worst they do it because they like hearing themselves talk and any conversation is just another opportunity to recount their life.
>> No. 35355 [Edit]
If you heard "they drowned", would you assume that person died? You can drown without dying, but wouldn't most people assume death unless stated otherwise? Most people wouldn't assume a person died if you just say "they were shot" though. In a sentence like "they were almost hung", you don't know whether they literally were almost hung, but weren't, or they were put in a noose, but the noose broke or something.
>> No. 35359 [Edit]
>>35334
This is quite funny. As a young outcast I envied normals because they were always talking with each other and I thought that would have to be so enriching and interesting. Then I could know better and noticed it was all babbling about inane shit and reading a shitty wikipedia article was already miles better than engaging into conversation with most people.
>> No. 35369 [Edit]
Assuming that neither would bring you any profit, would you rather own the greatest art collection in the world, or be able to paint anything you want really well?

Post edited on 26th Jun 2020, 8:57am
>> No. 35370 [Edit]
>>35369
If there's no profit, then I would like to have the skill to paint, draw or anything. What's the point of owning the collection? It's not going to be too much better than most of the great museums in the world I could visit and taking care of it would be too much of a responsibility.
>> No. 35371 [Edit]
>>35370
I think some people like collecting paintings just for the sake of owning them.

Post edited on 26th Jun 2020, 9:36am
>> No. 35372 [Edit]
>>35371
It's mostly a rich people thing, status has lot to do with it, sometimes it's an investment and sometimes money laundering. If it's really good and important art I don't think it should be in the hands of one person. If I owned that collection I would cede it to some good museum or public place were it could be shown and that itself would beat any purpose of owning it in the first place.
>> No. 35373 [Edit]
>>35369
I would rather own the greatest collection. Even if I knew how to paint the act itself still takes a lot of time.
>> No. 35374 [Edit]
>>35373
A good artist can crank out nice looking stuff within half an hour at most. Not every art piece has to be a give it your all.
>> No. 35375 [Edit]
>>35374
They could do rough line art in that time but it takes much longer for a fully done character and then longer still if you want a background or a more complex scene.
>> No. 35400 [Edit]
File 159378816595.jpg - (372.41KB , 900x1000 , 78809138_p0_master1200.jpg )
35400
Why does most imageboard software use MySQL instead of PostgreSQL?
>> No. 35401 [Edit]
>>35400
I'm just guessing, but it's probably a legacy of the main php-based imageboards needing to run on shared hosting sites, and mysql seems to be a more popular offering there.
>> No. 35437 [Edit]
I've been gone for several years. I thought I could find my old posts, but I have no clue which ones I wrote and which ones I didn't. Maybe you can only see yourself when you're still hooked into the hivemind, I must have lost the ability.
>> No. 35492 [Edit]
File 159564729111.jpg - (26.47KB , 612x457 , 20200802.jpg )
35492
I eat proper ice-cream.

"Soft serve contains the expected dairy and sweeteners, like milk, nonfat milk, sugar, corn syrup and whey, but, there’s more.

We took a look at the ingredients found in McDonald’s and Dairy Queen soft serve, and here’s what we found is lurking on the list:

Polysorbate 80 is used as an emulsifier in foods and cosmetics. It’s added to soft serve to prevent milk proteins from completely coating the fat droplets. This allows the soft serve to bind and locks air into the mixture. (McDonald’s, DQ)

Mono- and diglycerides come from fatty acids. They’re used as another emulsifier. They help combine ingredients containing fat with ingredients containing water (because the two don’t normally merge well on their own). (McDonald’s, DQ)

Carrageenan is a carbohydrate extracted from red seaweed. It’s used for its gelling, stabilizing and thickening properties. (McDonald’s, DQ)

Guar gum is made from the endosperm of the guar bean. It’s used as a thickening agent. The use of it in diet pills was banned in the 1980s because it was dangerous, but small amounts of it ― like what’s found in soft serve ― have been established as safe. (McDonald’s, DQ)

Cellulose gum comes from the cell walls of plants such as wood pulp and cottonseeds. It is another thickener. It is commonly used in the food industry and adds to the mouthfeel and texture of a product. (McDonald’s)

Sodium Phosphate is used in many foods and serves many purposes. It can be used as a texturizer, an emulsifier or a leavening agent. (McDonald’s)"
>> No. 35509 [Edit]
>>35492
Most brand-name ice-cream in supermarkets isn't actually ice cream (in that it doesn't contain enough cream) and is labelled "frozen dairy dessert" or something along those lines.
>> No. 35510 [Edit]
I don't know if I've missed any good anime with bad or no OPs but the OP is generally what convinces me to watch and often even to keep going.
>> No. 35511 [Edit]
>>35510
Anecdotally I can't think of any stellar anime I've watched that hasn't had either an ED or OP that I've also enjoyed. So your heuristic is probably not too bad. You could potentially broaden it a bit by considering both the op/ed.
>> No. 35512 [Edit]
>>35511
Yeah great EDs are less common but they work too.
Sadly this same reason led me to finish chaos;head
>> No. 35523 [Edit]
File 159575480751.jpg - (156.75KB , 1280x720 , 20200726.jpg )
35523
>>35512
Best ED in recent memory is Chika Dance ED
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_BM7Ec7y0Q
>> No. 35665 [Edit]
File 159754710619.webm - (858.56KB , 22.webm )
35665
>>33956
Any sufficient large corporation will eventually be evil aka "power corrupts".
https://mattstoller.substack.com/p/the-day-big-tech-stopped-being-untouchable
>> No. 35672 [Edit]
>>35665
Many businesses aren't ethical and fair even when they're small. Facebook for example was always a corrupt scheme ran by a psychopath.
>> No. 35673 [Edit]
>>35672
Yeah, gotta climb the ladder somehow.
>> No. 35713 [Edit]
File 159791543694.jpg - (390.96KB , 1366x768 , machi.jpg )
35713
Why are people so unkind?
>> No. 35714 [Edit]
>>35713
Could be a number of reasons. Being treated poorly by people around them, having a hard life with lots of built up stress, having been brought up in a culture that teaches against kindness, or could be you're just meeting them on a bad day.
>> No. 35716 [Edit]
>>35713
I don't think they are they are just dumb and self-centred.
>> No. 35717 [Edit]
>>35713
Misery loves company
>> No. 35718 [Edit]
>>35713
Because kindness can be seen as weakness.
>> No. 35817 [Edit]
File 159905011882.jpg - (337.85KB , 1080x607 , 20200906.jpg )
35817
Does Summer stop in September?
>> No. 35819 [Edit]
>>35817
Yes and no
>> No. 35820 [Edit]
it stops on the day of the autumnal equinox.
>> No. 35822 [Edit]
File 159936379476.jpg - (292.57KB , 900x383 , 20200906.jpg )
35822
>>35817
>>35819
>>35820
Gotcha
>> No. 35972 [Edit]
File 160065596677.jpg - (499.96KB , 841x969 , crushedbyenvy.jpg )
35972
I just found out about Demonophobia. Does anybody remember it?
>> No. 35985 [Edit]
>>35972
I haven't heard about it in years, I remember being quite fascinated by it, I think I even played it a bit but not too much for some reason.
>> No. 35986 [Edit]
>>35985
Trial and error games are tedious.
>> No. 36007 [Edit]
File 160088185083.png - (215.24KB , 739x308 , common_bg_mainhome.png )
36007
http://aisp.jp/
Does anyone remember aisp@ce?
>> No. 36008 [Edit]
>>36007
I was talking about that with someone over irc just last week, mainly about how dead it was even when it launched, and that the Japanese players would always freak out and run away from English speaking players. I remember it had a few nice colabs, like with Navel, touhou, and KEY. I feel like it was a bit ahead of it's time. Something like that would be much more popular these days now that we actually have not only a use but a need for virtual hang outs.
>> No. 36009 [Edit]
>>36008
It was very ahead of its time. It's also interesting in that it was something that was cult in both the west and Japan, you don't see that very often aside from maybe furrydom. I guess there is VRChat but that has kind of a weird connotation about that in the west with the dreaded ironic weeb label being put on it and all.
Yeah, it sounds nice, reading about the islands and whatever else info there is on the english-speaking internet is both interesting and wistful at the same time.
I suppose Mabonigi was filling the same niche with more stuff to do, just without the IPs.
In general, MMOs are kind of sad, considering that most of them will eventually die, and while most do get private servers, they are usually not the same as it was during live.
>> No. 36058 [Edit]
File GH.mp4 - (0.96MB )

36058
What's good for the GEESE is good for the GANDER.
>> No. 36366 [Edit]
File 160318505939.png - (146.70KB , 611x612 , bf3afa8487a30b23af13aa05ec8ba37d.png )
36366
I've realized from time to time that I have a bad habit of taking the good things I do have in my life for granted. It's kind of easy to do that when I feel miserable so often in my life. For what is probably more than one reason I find myself wanting more. I want the fun happy friend-filled life I see in anime, I want someone I can express my honest feelings to, I want friends who share my likes and dislikes, I want to be less tired, I want to be loved and a whole bunch of other things. Thankfully I remember, sooner or later if not immediately, that I'm fortunate enough to have good friends online that are probably better friends now than any friends I ever had when I was a kid. I can at least go outside at all and now have the means to actually do so. I think maybe it's just easy to say I'm ungrateful but when ideals unfold before my eyes then desire can disregard the fact that it's usually fiction, especially when I know plenty of normalfags are lucky enough to live that ideal if they don't throw a wrench in it because they hate good things. To call myself selfish every time those feelings come up probably isn't healthy but it's hard for me to not consider the possibility. Maybe it's because of how I was raised and I think too much about other people. If nothing else, it would be nice if healing anime wasn't such a double-edged sword for me.
>> No. 36367 [Edit]
File 160319793921.jpg - (544.31KB , 849x1200 , 1595314547626.jpg )
36367
>>36366
I can only relate to wanting love and some kind of company. I don't see the appeal in having an entourage of people expecting your time and attention because I don't think there's different kinds of intimate relationships. A friend is at most a 50% relationship. A family member is at most a 60% relationship. A partner is ideally a 100% relationship. If I had a 100% relationship with something that could do that for me, I wouldn't want any lesser relationships in my life sucking my time and energy.
>> No. 36368 [Edit]
I don't really want love or a friend I just want to be able to talk about more niche topics with people on an image board format who are not scum. For example, with games like Genshin Impact, Nioh or Dark Souls I sometimes feel like I want to talk about it or hear what people are doing with it and what they are talking about. Of course I could go to 4chan but it's 4chan and boards like here and the /jp/ spin-offs don't really talk much in depth about this as they simply don't have the numbers.
>> No. 36370 [Edit]
>>36366
Maybe because I didn't have too much when I was a kid so I never had that problem. In my fist 12 years of existence I didn't even have electricity for most of time and the little I ever had burnt to flames at that same age.
I could use my first computer at 14 yo (actually it was my father's) and while amazing it was kinda shit so just being able to have a modern computer of my own still feels great 20 years later. I never had childhood friends or on-line friends, but I just find my existence really good compared to high school considering I don't get physically abused in a daily basis and can do whatever the fuck I want almost all the time I'm not working. Everything is quite comfortable and I consider myself a really lucky person, while I recognize most people would consider my life absolutely horrendous. I just think they don't have their priorities clear and like you said, take things for granted. It's quite amusing when someone tries to convince you you aren't really happy and you should change it all drastically. Maybe it helps that I basically have the same needs and wishes I had when I was 15, so all the complex needs and existential problems of an adult just fly over my head, good thing of being immature, I guess.
>> No. 36371 [Edit]
As I've been trying to penetrate multivariable calculus, I've noticed that a creative and an adaptive mind is a necessity. Thus, how does one extend and improve such thinking? By doing? Doing what?
>> No. 36372 [Edit]
>>36371
I'm still on single variable calc, so I can't help you much. I don't believe in "general" brain training. You'll get better at solving multivariable calculus by doing a lot of progressively more difficult multivariable calculus problems and recognizing patterns. That's it.
>> No. 36387 [Edit]
>>36371
It depends on whether you're doing this recreationally or as part of formal academic study. The unfortunate fact is that most math textbooks are downright terrible (blame the bourbaki group). Calculus hasn't changed must in the past century. Get yourself the oldest multivariable textbook you can, and chances are you'll find it more illuminating than the stuff in today's books.

Also, it's quite possible that your foundation in single-variable calculus is not as strong as you think it is. It might be beneficial to go over it once using a different (preferably older) textbook. Most of multi-variable calculus is a natural generalization of single-variable calculus.
>> No. 36399 [Edit]
>>36370
I don't know what your situation is but from this post I wouldn't find it hard to believe that you are satisfied. Gratitude certainly has a role in determining a person's hedonic set point. That said, I've tried keeping a gratitude journal for the sake of raising my mood and it didn't work. I'd try to think of things to write and only end up feeling that they weren't actually that good, and I wasn't too grateful for them after all, and other stuff like that, not getting much down on the page. Or I'd manage to express a thought after all and find that my mood remained exactly the same.
Have any of you tried keeping a gratitude journal with successful results?
>> No. 36401 [Edit]
This idea of forcing oneself to be satisfied and grateful for an objectively shit life is fucking insulting.
>> No. 36405 [Edit]
>>36399
It's probably just tokiko again.
>> No. 36406 [Edit]
>>36399
>Have any of you tried keeping a gratitude journal with successful results
Tangential, but I once took an "MBA" class as part of a tedious humanities requirement. What I got was two hours a week of pure, concentrated bullshit – the kind you'd find at fluffy ted talks. We covered the whole lot of insanity: from how myer-briggs types can be used to determine "leadership styles" to how you should keep "gratitude" in mind as you deal with conflict resolution.
(And we had as an exercise that gratitude journal bullshit, which ended up being 100% fabricated nonsense).

The only thing I ended up learning from that class was that mba should stand for master bullshit artist.
>> No. 36455 [Edit]
>>36372
You're generally correct. However, I've been trying to develop sufficient pattern recognition for years, but I've yet to achieve moderate success therein despite doing many problems and exercises. Am I being limited by my intellect, or is there something yet to be done? (I hope your studies go well, by the way. Calculus is enjoyable for those whose minds are capable.)

>>36387
I'm learning calculus III in preparation for an actual class, and using a textbook (Stewart) that will probably be required by that institution. However, I've been using other, and older, textbooks for alternate viewpoints on matters I could not grok. I'll see about utilizing older textbooks as per your suggestion.

>blame the bourbaki group
I will read more about this later, but from my cursory reading they seem outputting to say the least.

>Also, it's quite possible that your foundation in single-variable calculus is not as strong as you think it is. It might be beneficial to go over it once using a different (preferably older) textbook.
I'd like to think that's not the case as I've aced both of my former calculus I & II classes. But something is clearly wrong. Perhaps academic standards have fallen more than I thought.
>> No. 36568 [Edit]
File 160459865149.jpg - (92.69KB , 800x521 , b0a2e786cb4187d46ad2d33df044ecd8.jpg )
36568
Sometimes, when I checked out some tiny imageboard on the clearnet or with tor or an abandoned 8chan board, they would be filled with pages and pages of the same text and images. I know that boorus and the like can ban images based on their hash value though.

If the image is changed at all, the hash value is different, but at least it would be more work for the spammer, so why haven't I ever seen hash banning on an imageboard? The people that run imageboards have above average programming knowledge, but I don't think any have thought of this.

Post edited on 5th Nov 2020, 9:51am
>> No. 36569 [Edit]
>>36568
I encountered it on 4chan many times. They just tell you it's a duplicate file and prevent you from posting it. Banning for that might be a bit extreme as it's something which can happen accidentally easily if it's a popular image (such as a meme). I've actually used the system to my advantage a few times in fact to prevent people from posting images I didn't like. There was a particular thread I would make, and when I did some people would post scat and guro images. Posting those in some thread on page 8 or something before making the thread helped to prevent this, as mods couldn't give less of a shit.
>> No. 36570 [Edit]
>>36568
It'd only be an incredibly minor amount of work. All you'd need to do is switch a single bit somewhere in the body of the file, which may well not even be visible (images can have random non-image data embedded). If you're capable of writing a spamming script, writing a script to flip a random bit in a png isn't a real amount of work.
That's probably why most IBs don't bother, the users and spammers are more tech savvy as well.
>> No. 36576 [Edit]
>>36455
I came across the book Advanced Calculus by Woods which is the book where Feynman learned the slick "differentiating under the integral sign" trick. It's a wonderful trove of information that you would never find in modern textbooks. Just mentioning it in case you'd like to take a look.

>>36570
>>36568
You could use a perceptual hash instead of ordinary bitwise hash. That would take care of the "flit a bit" issue, albeit at the expense of additional server-side processing.
>> No. 36631 [Edit]
>It's a wonderful trove of information that you would never find in modern textbooks. Just mentioning it in case you'd like to take a look.
I very much will, thanks!
>> No. 36644 [Edit]
File 160505087611.jpg - (779.18KB , 1080x1080 , 78daf9b496a7c994d7aaca29ff32a26f.jpg )
36644
I wondered today if I see things for how they really are or if I'm deluded in some way. Even some of the most cynical people I've talked to find solace in something. They see the good in at least one thing. I don't see much of anything positively, not new stuff at least or even plenty of old things. I at least have the things I managed to love somehow like games I'm fond of and foods I like to eat but that's about it, very minor things that aren't enough to keep someone going and feeling happy. Others can see the world as something beautiful and honest or enjoy 2d as some perfect world or even enjoy modern games or talking to people or something but I can barely stomach most of it, if not all. It feels like I've been slowly sliding down into increasing pessimism for years of my life to the point where I feel like I live in a completely different world from most people. The way they describe things is so annoying and untrue to me, so different from how I see it that it makes me wonder if I'm seeing things wrong or that many people really are completely illusioned. It's a bit of a scary thought but nonetheless, that's the reality of it. Thinking about it more, it would be disturbing if I wasn't so used to bad things.
>> No. 36645 [Edit]
File 16050520513.jpg - (184.21KB , 850x564 , sample_4e8921966ae1336eb3634baa51773256.jpg )
36645
>>36644
I don't agree with the "good" vs "bad" dichotomy of seeing the world. I don't think the world has to be beautiful or honest or whatever. What's important to me is that things are interesting. If something is interesting, I can get some kind of enjoyment out of it. I don't see why pessimism would spoil interesting things unless boredom also comes with it. Maybe you're just unhealthy and your feelings have nothing to do with your perception of the world.
>> No. 36649 [Edit]
>>36644
I always disliked the attitude of "it's all shit", commonly mixed with elitism. I somehow see it more often these days and to me that's the kind of thing that feels untrue. But if you really feel like that, I can't really say anything. It's an alien feeling to me, maybe because I didn't have too much as a kid but I always find so many things interesting.
>> No. 36650 [Edit]
File 160512482521.png - (922.28KB , 740x973 , f705fb470a4a6edc2483f5e794cf59ab.png )
36650
>>36649
>I always disliked the attitude of "it's all shit", commonly mixed with elitism.
Reading this on Tohno-chan feels kind of bizarre. It makes me wonder if you honestly feel that way or are just being a contrarian for the sake of it. If you do feel that way, it sounds nice.
>>36645
Even though it feels kind of dismissive, I hope sometimes that the world isn't as terrible as I see it and that maybe it's just me. It would feel very lonely if that were true but it would be nice to believe that things aren't truly so terrible.
>> No. 36651 [Edit]
>>36644
I don't know if I'm like you, but I can't remember the last time I truly enjoyed something. I have to go back around 6-7 years, when I was still young and idealistic. I can't say when everything slipped away from me, but be it anime, games or imageboards I don't have fun with anything new nowadays; my only salvation are the brief flashes of nostalgia that I feel when I watch something I truly loved when all those years ago.
>> No. 36688 [Edit]
File 160550997227.jpg - (1.01MB , 1190x1683 , 3153a6a3f6aa09dce7c2a96a7c15b31c.jpg )
36688
Something I have struggled with for a long time is ruin by association. A lot of the things I used to like have been ruined because the people who like it are very unsavory people or because it has negative associations. Something like awful fanbases or negative memories. It sounds really silly and it feels that way to have this kind of problem for so long. Some while ago I tried to take actions against this but it was really hard and I couldn't do it. When something you like has such negativity surrounding it, it's hard to see that something in the same positive way as before.
I have been given advice more than once by more than one person throughout the course of my life to not let the things I like be ruined by such petty things but I have almost no idea how to make that happen. The only thing I can do to prevent this is distance myself from associations and groups. To keep my interests to myself from the very start. But that's always only so effective before anything that can ruin it seems to follow me and appear more often. It's strange and frustrating and I don't want to deal with it anymore.
>> No. 36693 [Edit]
>>36688
What does liking something look like for you? How do your actions or thoughts change when a thing you like is "ruined" in this way?
>> No. 36702 [Edit]
File 160563502410.png - (488.04KB , 815x548 , 52157bc10939cc6d5824c7a16ce9fa1b.png )
36702
I wonder if mainstream pop-culture is ever going to be nostalgic for right now in the future, or if it's so unappealing it never will be.
>> No. 36703 [Edit]
>>36702
I think the teens of today will look back on it fondly when they're middle aged. Many of them do seem to be aware of how fucked up world is, both economically and culturally, but the majority don't seem to care from what I can gather.
Besides, Everything always seems like shit to older generations, it's a cycle that never ends.
>> No. 36704 [Edit]
>>36702
I think there's enough for existing children to get nostalgic over. Minecraft, for example. That game absolutely captivated my niece and nephew when they were in the range of 10--15 years, but they don't play it so much now. In 2030 they and millions of others like them will be nostalgiafags over it in their late 20s.
>> No. 36756 [Edit]
File 160599897614.jpg - (606.18KB , 849x1200 , 83754360_p0_master1200.jpg )
36756
For as long as imageboards have existed, there have been people who want to draw like Japanese artists, and there have been people recommending them Loomis and similar western drawing guides. Not once though have I seen anybody ask if that's actually how Japanese artists learn to do it. If you want to draw like Japanese artists, doesn't it make sense to learn like they do? Do Japanese people actually read translated copies of Loomis? Are their drawing books the same? Do they even use drawing books? What is the answer to this massive mystery?

Post edited on 21st Nov 2020, 2:52pm
>> No. 36757 [Edit]
>>36756
The fact that they learn calligraphy (or at least learn to write kanji with proper stroke, composition, etc.) probably gives them an edge. Also an environment where from an early age manga and doujins are accepted.
>> No. 36758 [Edit]
>>36757
It's not like every single Japanese person can draw though. They still have to learn somehow.
>> No. 36763 [Edit]
File 160606323191.png - (2.13MB , 1024x1024 , 05dc1ba90e0888c974f5dec8df62abb9.png )
36763
>>36756
I've found a lead, but I can't dicipher it
https://chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/search/?p=%E6%8F%8F%E3%81%8F&flg=3&class=1&ei=UTF-8&fr=common-navi
https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11229800401?__ysp=5o%2BP44GP

I put it through a translator and "the bite" kept coming up. What the fuck is the bite? It's probably a mistranslation.

https://detail.chiebukuro.yahoo.co.jp/qa/question_detail/q11206755396?__ysp=5o%2BP44GP
"I love to paint.
But lately I've been jealous of the kids who are good at drawing.
It's kind of painful to see people the same age and better at it on Twitter.
A good friend of mine has been writing since she was really young, and probably the better Twitterers have been doing it for years.
I'm only 2 years old!
But I feel there is a difference with kids who started at about the same
I don't know if it's because she started taking painting classes and has spent more time painting than me, but
I envy the children who are allowed by their parents to draw
I need half an hour of free time every two days and to stay up late at night to paint.
There is no way
I have to study at an important time
Even children who have a good environment for painting
I'm jealous of the kids who are better at drawing than me
I'd like to say that it's not a choice because of the difference in time spent.
Ah, I want to be
I had a strong feeling that
I should have more time for this year's end!
So you can do better!
So you can catch up.

Sorry for the jumble of sentences
What I'm trying to say is that
How not to be jealous of a good painter

The better painters also practice, right?
You've been practicing since you were younger than me, right?
If it's all about talent, I won't be able to do my best."
>> No. 36764 [Edit]
File 160606545516.jpg - (671.98KB , 1500x921 , lolibooru 284435 sample.jpg )
36764
>>36763
I found more info and few actual book recommendations. Even if this info isn't useful, it's very interesting. One person actually mentioned loomis. Here are my findings -
https://textbin.net/raw/f4VZNknuAj

Post edited on 22nd Nov 2020, 9:19am
>> No. 36766 [Edit]
>>36763
I assume you're referring to "アタリ" (atari) in this sentence, which for some reason DeepL translates as "bite"
>私もアタリから描くのが苦手なのですが
It seems that "atari" translates as rough drawing (without detailed features).
The etymology of this was a bit harder to trace down (and as this appears to be an art-specific term, apparently even native JP people are mystified by it at first)
https://oshiete.goo.ne.jp/qa/2341823.html
From the above, it seems that it is indeed derived from the well-known 当たる (ataru), which has among its meanings the idea of "hitting upon (an idea)" or "feeling out (something)" from which the art-specific usage of "アタリ" as in sketching a rough guideline follows.

Post edited on 22nd Nov 2020, 1:58pm
>> No. 36767 [Edit]
File 160609535790.jpg - (381.11KB , 1024x768 , 4cac40af498bd376daff69b1dfb9f7dd.jpg )
36767
Does anybody else form passwords based on simple physical motions on the keyboard? Stuff like diagonal rows of keys and opposite motion of both hands can make really long, but easily remembered passwords. Something like 1/2.3,4m5n6b is considered a strong password by password testers, but I don't know if it actually is or not because it's based on human intuition. You could also use basic arithmetic like (20-5)*2=30, which would apparently take 1 million years to crack, but I don't know.

Post edited on 22nd Nov 2020, 5:41pm
>> No. 36768 [Edit]
>>36767
That's not likely to be a strong password because most common patterns will already be part of released password lists. That particular password is clearly no good as can be verified against [1]. Your arithmetic example is also not strong since just knowing that your password is an arithmetic expression greatly reduces the search space.

Don't try to get clever with your passwords. Either generate a completely random alphanumeric (plus symbols) string, or use the diceware method (basically a fancy name for just picking words at random and then concatenating them together. This isn't technically as strong as an alphanumeric sequence of same length, but the advantage of dice ware is that it's more memorable so you can choose a longer password to compensate. Best of all, use a password manager (doesn't need to be paid or fancy, just gnu pass works fine).

[1] https://haveibeenpwned.com/Passwords
>> No. 36769 [Edit]
>>36768
>most common patterns will already be part of released password lists
I wouldn't actually use that password, but I would use some expanded variation of it based on the same principle with a few extra characters at the end. 1/2.3,4m5n6b6bthfuc8+~ for example isn't verified. (20-5)*2=30arth1? also isn't. You could also do triangles: zsedcnjik,zn or circles: zawedxju89okzj or trapezoids: zserfvcxnjiol.,mzn. I'm wondering if anybody actually has picked up on these tricks yet or not.

Post edited on 22nd Nov 2020, 7:10pm
>> No. 36770 [Edit]
>>36769
Why rely on security via obscurity when you could just pick a strong password uniformly at random in the first place? The fact that the "shape" sequences you mentioned have the property that the next character is proximally close to the previous character on the keyboard means that anyone who implements this in a brute-force heuristic will crack those passwords easily.

> but I would use some expanded variation of it based on the same principle
Dictionary/existing password list + additional characters is already a well-employed heuristic. Since that "1/2.3..." prefix is part of password-lists, tacking on a few extra characters isn't going to change much.

If you want to create something memorable, use the dice-ware method and pick ten words from the dictionary (you may counter that the fact that we're using dictionary words makes this "insecure." It doesn't: even if the attacker knows the exact word list we chose, the fact that it's done uniformly at random means we can calculate the entropy of a passphrase, or equivalently how long it would take to brute-force even with that knowledge. Note that no strategy can do better than pure brute-force here. I.e. unlike your password schemes where heuristics can easily narrow the search space, here one is forced to enumerate the entire space. The only way to narrow the space is if we leak information on the password itself, the first character/etc. There's probably a way to formalize this as a counterpart to cryptographic perfect-secrecy, but either way the underlying principle is that the only rigorously secure passwords are those that are chosen uniformly at random from an underlying set. Whether that set is a set of characters or words only changes the entropy by a constant factor and you can adjust the length to compensate. If you really wanted you could enumerate all possible algebraic expressions or "keyboard motion" sequences up to a certain length and then pick one of those at random. However, I suspect the lengths needed will be excessively large since both of those are very constrained sequences and adjacent characters are not independent.)

Post edited on 22nd Nov 2020, 7:41pm
>> No. 36771 [Edit]
File 160610442810.jpg - (26.08KB , 400x524 , ac961bff411c1411ebc7863f75449b08.jpg )
36771
>>36770
>Why rely on security via obscurity when you could just pick a strong password uniformly at random in the first place?
I wouldn't want to be completely reliant on password managers(I could be using a different machine to access the same account) and I really like being able to type things in with muscle memory. If I ever need a password for something really important, I guess I'll use a randomly generated one. One last thing I came up with since you mentioned a problem with adjacent keys would be also alternating the hands while making two or more shapes like: ajwieodlx,zm, but I'm guessing that could also be accounted for. Most people don't use random passwords, so my method is at least some kind of improvement I think.

Post edited on 22nd Nov 2020, 8:11pm
>> No. 36772 [Edit]
>>36771
>Most people don't use random passwords, so my method is at least some kind of improvement
That's a low bar to clear, since most people will probably end up getting their accounts compromised. A lot of websites use 2-factor authentication now anyway. Since you need a phone or yubikey (or other U2F, etc.) for that anyway, can't you just load a password manager on your phone?

>One last thing I came up with since you mentioned a problem with adjacent keys would be also alternating the hands while making two shapes
This feels like the people who try to create crypto systems in an ad-hoc fashion. Don't do that. Use strong primitives, and the strongest primitive you have at your disposable is (pseudo)randomness. With that you can create a password that's provably secure.

Of course all this may be for nought if the website you're using doesn't store passwords properly in the first place. And most high profile sites will use two factor authentication which makes the strength of the password less critical (but still important, security in layers!).

I suppose if you really don't want a password manager but still want a scheme to construct passwords

HASH(master phrase || website name)

Where HASH is a deterministic hash like sha256. This is probably safe since even if some website stores a password in plain-text they'd have to reverse the hash (which can't be done via a rainbow table attack since the master phrase is effectively a salt). (If someone is doing a targeted attack on you as a specific user then this wouldn't be safe though since sha256 is a fast hash, and this reduces to a brute-force attack on the master phrase. I would not use this to secure a bitcoin/shitcoin wallet or anything). One weakness is that if the master is compromised then so too are all derived passwords, if you never use the master directly this should be fine. The bigger issue is with sites that have arbitrary password restrictions (length limits, prohibited symbols).
>> No. 36773 [Edit]
>>36772
>can't you just load a password manager on your phone?
If I'm ever using a shared computer in some place like a library or whatever that's not really a solution. Or if my machine completely stops being usable for whatever reason. The hash idea still requires using an outside program to come up with something, so I might as well just use a randomly generated one at that point.

I came up with the idea of using kanji, something like :青鸞と龜bluluan&t. There's a ton of them, so wouldn't that be reasonably effective?
>> No. 36774 [Edit]
>>36773
If you choose your kanji at random, sure that seems fine. Most websites probably won't allow you to use arbitrary unicode in your password though, so you'll have to romanize it which destroys all the entropy.

You're probably overthinking this. If this is an important account (mail, banking, etc.) then you should use two factor authentication coupled with a reasonably strong password (diceware-esque so it's memorable would be fine). And I sure hope you're not doing things like banking on a shared/untrusted computer, because at that point your password is the least of your concerns (I personally wouldn't even log into email on an untrusted computer because who knows if they've got a keylogger installed on there). If it's not important (e.g. booru) then what you choose as a password really doesn't matter so long as it's not identical to something else you used.

Post edited on 22nd Nov 2020, 9:34pm
>> No. 36775 [Edit]
>>36774
>Most websites probably won't allow you to use arbitrary unicode in your password though
Really? That seems misguided. I tried it on a random booru site just now and it worked.
>> No. 36776 [Edit]
>>36775
It depends how well the website is coded. Websites of large internet conglomerates as well as otaku-targeted sites probably handle it fine, but I don't have much faith that your typical small American company is going to get it right considering how many of them do things such as impose password length limits.
>> No. 36799 [Edit]
File 160637092454.jpg - (78.31KB , 692x945 , akan2.jpg )
36799
If you played anime songs (karaoke or off-vocal versions) all day, how long will a normie wise-up to it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqx2GL4WJ98
>> No. 36800 [Edit]
>>36799
Once you hit something widely known, such as a jojo or dragonball theme song.
>> No. 36884 [Edit]
File 160689683668.jpg - (145.87KB , 850x616 , 20201220.jpg )
36884
>>36800
It happened
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5gS_nrOeTA
>> No. 36885 [Edit]
>>36884
So that's who all the shark little girl art is based on? Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhh I really prefer the anime original.
>> No. 36912 [Edit]
File 160709939592.jpg - (239.87KB , 1023x1500 , 43434.jpg )
36912
How do webcrawlers and search engines actually work? When you search loli, pretty much every search engine that uses google results, including duckduckgo, returns a bunch of news articles, a wikihow page called how to spot pedophiles(neither of which include any instance of the word loli) and a ton of wikipedia pages. How much privacy is part of their marketing doesn't affect this. Bing returns a bunch of Japanese websites, which appear to be more relevant to an extent, but no pornography in the images section even with safe search off. Yandex is much the same as bing, but mostly with russian sites.

Goo, a Japanese search engine, seems to return more accurate results when the romanized loli is used than ロリ for some reason. ロリ also gives no image results on it, but loli does, some of which actually are pornographic, so I don't think safesearch matters.

What's the deal? Webcrawlers seem like they should be a simple thing, just index things based on the words. It sounds really simple. Not only do you not get what you're looking for, you can't even adjust your results to fit your interests better or filter out specific sites like news ones or wikipedia. You can't tell the engine to to give results based on popularity or unpopularity or from most recently updated to oldest. A brute force, loli site:gelbooru.com, or pretty much any booru search on google returns 0 results and this message: Warning Child sexual abuse imagery is illegal. Pixiv is except from this for some reason, but the image results are much the same. There also doesn't seem to be any search engine that just indexes absoluely everything, they're all organized and curated in some mysterious way.

The options for finding shit seem to be word of mouth and using multiple search engines. Is there any better option? Can I use own webcrawler or something?

Post edited on 4th Dec 2020, 8:36am
>> No. 36915 [Edit]
>>36912
Search engines send webcrawlers to websites. There's tags you can present to them, and they read text on your site, which gets fed through either an ML algorithm or a manual algorithm (nowadays nearly certainly mostly the former) which uses the information to find out what a website is a about, then a further algorithm to determine what ranking it has.
Many modern sites have a censorship algorithm after that, which ends up gimping them, but makes lawsuits less likely and helps them push viewpoints they like because tech giants at some point decided that they are gods that should form society in their own image.
And some sites just mirror a Google/some other search site's search (like searx), or at least refer to them as part of one of the above algorithms.
Best bet: Some country made loli illegal and actually sued some search company, which then had every search company add these things to their sites to avoid getting sued. Or they decided on their own that loli is CP because they're stupid. It's a part of the censorship algorithm, you get similar results if you search "How to start smoking" and such things.
>> No. 36916 [Edit]
>>36912
The reason Japanese sites are less affected is a combination of bias towards their own language when training/programming their algorithms (the loli/ロリ distinction) and not being particularly catered towards gaijin and therefore not caring about gaijin law(pixiv)
>> No. 36919 [Edit]
File 160712383843.jpg - (222.33KB , 1500x843 , iuui.jpg )
36919
>>36915
Your best bet isn't something I can actively do. I tried using yacy today, a p2p search engine, but it kind of sucks. The results are limited and ordered semi-randomly, and the image results also seem gimped, but I'm not sure who's fault that is. In some ways though, it's clearly less restricted. I'm surprised nobody has tried making a better attempt at a p2p search engine in the last ten years.
>> No. 36920 [Edit]
>>36915
>The reason Japanese sites are less affected
Yahoo JP is actually uses google under the hood. But yes the reason why you get more relevant content using a jp engine is because of regional differences leading to different priotization in the ranking.

>>36912
>you can't even adjust your results to fit your interests
Google actually does do this. If you browse logged in and let it slurp up data about you, then it will "personalize" search results. I think this is mainly only done at the level of query rewriting though. So if you're a programmer and you search some overloaded term, the personalization will surface the programming relevant entries.

>Can I use own webcrawler or something?
Yes and no. If you want to crawl at Google-scale (all sites), forget about it. Aside from the fact that if you're not google then any web crawler is going to hit severe rate limits, I think the main limitation in bootstrapping a search engine isn't the crawling part but the ranking/indexing part. Here, while there's no fundamental technical limitation as to why someone else couldn't come out with a better system, it requires perfect execution on both fronts, neither of which seems to have been accomplished by competitors like Bing. Aside from the scale of infrastructure needed for the indexing, I think the ranking for long-tail queries is still the reason why Google holds the edge and a big part of the reason is the need to combat link-spam. If you took the same Google algorithm from 2003 and ran it on today's web, I doubt you'd get good results. And even then lately I've noticed a lot of linkspam on obscure queries, so it seems even google is not immune to this.

But if you want to crawl only a subset of known sites, then yes you can build your own and it will perform better than Google because you are only indexing "quality" content. There are open-source things like ElasticSearch/Solr (both of which use Lucene for the indexing if I recall) which will do this given a corpus.

>that just indexes absoluely everything, they're all organized and curated in some mysterious way.
You don't want to index absolutely everything, because then you're indexing a lot of spam and low-quality which will pollute search results. I don't know the reason why Google filters gelbooru, it's possible they just blacklist "loli" to avoid complaints from the feds.

Yandex is usually my go to for image searches (reverse image search in particular). It performs much better than Google for 2D pics. Maybe try yandex for search results also?
>> No. 36921 [Edit]
>>36920
Could you use a crawler without indexing anything? By that I mean giving it some starting point and having it crawl webpages until if finds something you specified it to look for. Nothing would need to be stored after the search and relying on an index wouldn't be necessary. Even if it would give false results a lot of the time, I think that would be useful.

>the reason why you get more relevant content using a jp engine is because of regional differences leading to different priotization in the ranking.
It goes both ways apparently. Searching ロリまんこ in duckduckgo will actually give you what you're looking for.

Post edited on 4th Dec 2020, 6:33pm
>> No. 36923 [Edit]
>>36921
>It goes both ways apparently. Searching ロリまんこ in duckduckgo will actually give you what you're looking for.
Then I suspect that in the JP search engines they convert the english to kana as well and search those. It makes sense for that demographic, but obviously it's a waste of resources for a western search engine to implement (I wonder if google.co.jp does it?)

>Could you use a crawler without indexing anything
If you are indexing a corpus of bounded size, yes you can do it but it might take a long time (~hours) to get meaningful results. For searching a few dozen sites I think you'd primarily be limited by page load times and avoiding rate limiting. You could write up something yourself that did this (commercially, I know DevonAgent can do this).

For anything larger however, (and in particular an unbounded corpus such as a fraction of the Internet), such a method will take too long for long-tail queries. That is, if you model the crawl naively as random walk (*) on a link graph you can probably derive some bounds on the hitting time for a specific page, (if it's a sparse erdos-reyni random graph then hitting time is is probably proportional to number of nodes). Nonetheless, such a random walk on a link graph is basically equivalent to how the original pagerank algorithm assigned weights, so you're likely to hit nodes with high eigenvector centrality early on (n.b., this is not equivalent to nodes with high degree. You can have a node with a single in-degree that is linked to from a popular page, and such a node might have high eigencentrality even though its indegree is 1).

What that means is that you will run into the "quality" pages early on in your crawl so it may not be too bad for searching popular pages, but it will take a long time to get meaningful results for long-tail queries that are only found on obscure pages. That is, since the internet is divided into fast-updating and slow-updating chunks. If you just crawl for a given duration, it's very unlikely that you will run into the slow-updating chunk that is someone's personal homepage that hasn't been updated since 2000.


(*) In practice you wouldn't do a random walk, because then you can run into dead-ends, bot traps, or revisiting pages. Instead you'd want to keep track of past visits (bloom filter?) and also have some sort of damping factor to discount internal links. So you'd end up doing something like the AOPIC algorithm.
>> No. 36929 [Edit]
I've been looking into the notion of "mora" and "syllables" in linguistics. Everyone says that "Japanese is mora timed" and that moras are different than syllables, but it just seems like a redefinition of the same concept. Take for instance something like kiita. Yes it's three mora, but no one actually pronounces the mora separately like "ki - i - ta", in practice it's just "kii-ta." So then what's the difference between the notion of "mora" and just having syllables with different vowel length? If you set "long vowel = 2 mora", "short vowel = 1 mora", then you basically just recover the notion of syllables, with the length of each syllable depending on a notion of "vowel length," just like it does in English (consider "cut" vs "cart").

At best you could say that mora is a subdivision of syllable such that each mora is roughly the same length (or equivalently mora is a unit of the "length" of a syllable), but it feels like a five-dollar word for a fifty-cent idea. Moreover, since JP is a syllabary, of course each syllable mora takes the same length of time since the notion of short/long vowels needs to be explicitly written out. The same probably holds for similar syllabary using languages as well, such as most Indian ones (e.g. Telugu).

Finally, the whole division of languages into "mora-timed/syllable-timed/stress-timed" seems insane. Isn't "mora timed" just a case of "syllable-timed" where the division of syllables into moras is regular and predictable (long syllable = 2 mora, short syllable = 1 mora)? Some recent research [1] has also disputed this categorization in favor of a more continuous measure in terms of vocalic intervals. This makes a lot more sense, and intuitively languages with complex constant clusters (e.g. English) are going to have more timing differences than ones like Japanese which will be relatively stable.


[1] https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/12089/whats-the-evidence-for-and-against-isochrony
>> No. 36930 [Edit]
File 160739310943.jpg - (50.49KB , 600x419 , lolibooru 291947 amatsukaze_(kantai_collection) an.jpg )
36930
I've been wondering where people really get their tastes from. It seems like nobody is really interested in looking into it, like looking for the answer is avoided because the answer might be really uncomfortable. Taste is treated as a sensitive, off-limits topic, similar to people's age or weight. People just chalk it up to magic basically. I like this thing because for whatever mysterious, unknowable reasons it pleases my sensory-cognitive complex. That's not an actual answer.


>>36929
Linguistics make less sense as a field of typological study than economics.
>> No. 36931 [Edit]
>>36930
>people really get their tastes from
You mean tastes as in preference (in e.g. media)? I think that past experiences probably play a role in shaping how relatable a work is to someone. It's also probably somewhat modulated (or counter-modulated if the person is antisocial) by societal preferences as well.
>> No. 36932 [Edit]
>>36931
That's a general thing, but I'd like to know if it could be determined exactly why somebody likes the things they do. Will it ever be possible to measure that?
>> No. 36933 [Edit]
>>36932
If we could do that then wouldn't we also be able to predict someone's actions? If you can pinpoint exactly why someone likes something, you can extend that to predict whether they will like something or not, so measuring "why" someone likes something seems to be a strictly harder problem since right now we can't even predict "whether" someone will like something more than a few seconds in advance.
>> No. 36937 [Edit]
>>36930
I think there's going to be a lot of factors that play into it. Nostalgia is of course going to be a big one. Things that remind people of better times, that they associate with good feelings, that's going to factor into it a lot. There's also repeatability and representation, if it feels like the person is being catered/pandered to. Taste in more abstract things such as pasterns, colors, design styles ect can come from an image a person is trying to project, an image that they either admired growing up, or was again there during times of positive emotions.
That's where I think a lot of mine come from at least.
>> No. 36938 [Edit]
Impress is a funny word. It draws an analogy to taking some object and pressing it into something soft like clay to leave it behind. There's a lot of words like this but something about impress in particular makes me chuckle. I'm not sure why. Maybe because it's so blatantly related to something external?

>>36930
This is something I've been wondering but more along the lines of hobbies. Why do people get into certain hobbies? "It's fun" seems like a shallow non-answer. There has to be something deeper that makes it fun for people. If you approach life in a very big picture way it seems unlikely you'll enjoy something like a model kit with a thousand parts because it's so detail oriented.

It really bugs me when I see people trying to make gatekeeping an evil thing, or encouraging people who normally wouldn't be into a hobby to get into it. You're essentially making it harder for people to find others who are like-minded. Tattoos are a good example. Back in the day if you saw someone with a lot of tats you could make a number of assumptions about them and be fairly on point. Now that everyone has tats you can't. It's just a passing, mainstream fashion statement. If I see somebody with tattoos I don't know if they're one of "my people" or just someone else who thought they were cool. And for the guy who had tats before they became like that... he's going to learn to dismiss people super quickly because he's so used to posers. Once tattoos became trendy and acceptable it became significantly harder for people who are naturally interested in them to find eachother.

Gatekeeping and elitism seem like a necessary "evil" to promote social cohesion. Honestly the people who are so intent on driving this narrative seem to be corporations and influencers who want their market to grow so they can make more money. People don't want to feel mean and so they parrot it not realizing what they're doing.
>> No. 36939 [Edit]
>>36938
I could agree with that but I also think elitism have a dark side and can be used for people that just wants to feel superior to others. Once one person is genuinely interested in something there's no point in being a bully just for the sake of it. Also have seen this between fans of niche things, sometimes it's like there's a series so obscure there's like only two people in the whole world who like it, but one likes one character and the other doesn't, so they will argue endlessly and hate each other to death even if they are the two only souls that could share that particular thing.
Another archetype I often see is the cynic contrarian, in a community dedicated to something, he hates all (all movies, all anime, all games) except maybe one example or two, and spends all his energy and time telling everyone how bad is their taste and how lower their standards are.
Most of this is imageboard culture, at this point.
>> No. 36940 [Edit]
>>36938
>Maybe because it's so blatantly related to something external?
In Japanese vocabulary you come across lots of words like these which make you pause for a moment. Like how "wakeru" means split but "wakaru" means understand. Seemingly unrelated at first, but then you come across "miwakeru" meaning "distinguish" and suddlenly the relationship makes sense. There's probably neat equivalents in English like "impression" as you mentioned, but since we're used to them we just take them for granted and don't pay much attention to their etymologies.
>> No. 36950 [Edit]
File 160770542130.jpg - (2.38MB , 2000x1767 , 86231640_p0.jpg )
36950
I just realized that by typing an address ending in .con or .met it will be redirected to .com and .net Like: tohno-chan.con redirects to tohno-chan.com
>> No. 36957 [Edit]
>>36950
That's not standard behavior. Either your browser is doing the redirecting for you (which it shouldn't), or your dns provider is doing it (which it also shouldn't).
>> No. 36958 [Edit]
>>36950
I just tried it in my Firefox and Firefox seems to try very hard to autocorrect typos of this type. Think it's your browser.
>> No. 36962 [Edit]
File 160774166610.jpg - (270.42KB , 1498x2048 , __hisakawa_nagi_and_hisakawa_hayate_idolmaster_and.jpg )
36962
I've always disregarded disclaimers in medias about fictional characters and real life similarities being a coincidence and chalked off such coincidences as an impossibility but apparently there was a manga character that was so similar to a real life person he thought it was based off him and he ended up meeting the mangaka and will have a character based off him featured in said manga.
>> No. 36963 [Edit]
>>36962
That's pretty awesome. What manga?
>> No. 36964 [Edit]
>>36962
Kimi wa Houkago Insomnia
>> No. 36966 [Edit]
>>36964
Which is also a good manga, regardless.
>> No. 36973 [Edit]
File 160778110368.jpg - (133.34KB , 1234x673 , Azumanga_Daioh_full_886046.jpg )
36973
>>36957
>>36958
I tried it out. It's the browser. I'm using the 83.0 version of Firefox at the moment. I'm not actually bothered by this, but it kinda weirds me out that there appears to be no traces of this change being mentioned anywhere. The only mentions of such a thing I managed to find were two old posts from 2002 and 2005 respectively, with users wishing that Firefox implemented such a change. There is actually a extension URLfixer for this, but I don't even have it installed on my browser.
Anyway it would be funny if we'd get to have .con and .met domains in the future.
Very strange indeed.
>> No. 36981 [Edit]
>>36973
>if we'd get to have .con and .met domains in the future
With gtlds, anything is possible if you have enough money to fork over. But I doubt those two specific ones would get approved due to the typosquatting potential.
>> No. 36982 [Edit]
You can see it here:
https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev/blob/ab3ba8fcb5323eecc3f6d63095b627a82b24dca5/docshell/base/URIFixup.jsm#L684

The actual change was introduced around march/april: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D68796
>> No. 36985 [Edit]
>>36981
(Sorry for double post but I can't seem to edit).
I'm also curious what happens "if "*.con" is indeed a valid hostname (e.g. you define "foo.con" in /etc/hosts). Does firefox still perform the redirection then? Skimming the code it seems like it would still try to rewrite it because ".con" isn't a "known" public suffix. But that doesn't seem like proper behavior at all.
>> No. 37018 [Edit]
File 160808589627.jpg - (189.46KB , 1000x1422 , ac0298d13fb8cdfb7c94432bfbce36f8.jpg )
37018
Imagine if there were anime award shows on tv, like on spike tv or some shit. How do you think that would play out?
>> No. 37020 [Edit]
File 160809027617.png - (2.06MB , 1480x961 , 5299ae90ed07a830dfb57a7b2da3af40.png )
37020
>>37018
It would probably start off with crummy or overrated shounen anime getting the most awards until an anime equivalent of the last of us 2 or some other equally or more pozzed excuse for a story becomes the new norm, all of this likely further increasing the rate of westernization anime will go through if it isn't going through it now damaging the industry as a whole, it's fans, and any of it's artistic merits in the pursuit of all-encompassing propaganda.
The early days of it would definitely exponentially increase the amount and volume of normalniggers screeching and masturbating about jojo or some shit. It would never happen but a bunch of horribly obnoxious normalfags gathering onstage in a circle sacrificing one of le ebul inculs by burning him at a stake or some shit while they scream references and furiously masturbate to niggers cosplaying as jojo characters would be a hilariously accurate representation of the people who pretend to like anime and possibly america as a whole.
>> No. 37022 [Edit]
>>37018
Look at the Game Awards and you'll know:
>Loads of previews that paid to be there
>Award goes to the highest paying/most westernized trash
>Everything gets decided by some random cabal of eceleb "experts" and not the audience at large to prevent any popular uprisings shattering the ivory tower view
>Nothing remotely niche even gets mentioned

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
>> No. 37026 [Edit]
File 160812871449.jpg - (602.71KB , 800x727 , ea50bac4c4370293e46b1a6cdd9785d8.jpg )
37026
The internet and imageboards have a lot of computer, programming, math, and maybe physics nerds, but why aren't there more biology nerds? How come there aren't more complicated discussions about protein synthesis and gene editing or whatever on imageboards?
>> No. 37027 [Edit]
>>37018
Just companies buying awards to make their products look better that's all.
>> No. 37033 [Edit]
>>37026
Biology is more messy and is more "soft" than the others you mentioned so it sort of makes sense that there's less overlap. It's also harder to get involved since having access to a labratory is essentially required. Biology also has a larger overlap with people going into the medical field, which strikes me as a group that's less likely to use imageboards. That being said, computational biology is a wonderful field full of neat algorithms even if you don't care about the biological part (if you just treat the genome as a string, then you can just view sequence alignment as a fuzzy string matching problem). The recent folding advancements by DeepMind are also cool!
>> No. 37036 [Edit]
>>37033
People can buy a crispr kit online for less than 200$ these days, pretty much any part of the world has insects and plants to dissect and I would consider much of programming to be softer than biology, but I see your point. I'm pursuing a biomed engineering degree, but I don't think I'll have anybody around these parts to talk about that stuff with once I actually know something about it.
>> No. 37037 [Edit]
>>37036
Neat, I didn't know that. I wonder if high schools will start adopting it as part of their curriculum.

>I would consider much of programming to be softer than biology
Hm maybe "softer" isn't a good word (it's too vague). More precisely you could say that you have more definite knowledge about the state of the system in question (computer, living organism respectively) and it's easier to manipulate that state in programming. Whereas with biological systems it's harder to isolate and manipulate just one aspect; while you could do it in vitro, often those results may not generalize to in-vivo because of all sorts of cross-interactions that couldn't have been known apriori. It's in that sense that biology is more "messy" and the strength of results obtained is a lot softer/weaker.

>anybody around these parts to talk about that stuff with once I actually know something about it.
You never know; try posting on /navi/! More activity is always welcome. Although I do wonder where the biologists hang out. Outside of stackexchange-esque QA sites, I don't recall ever coming across a discussion forum for biology.
>> No. 37088 [Edit]
I found out that you can cause gum recession from brushing too hard. Stupid money grubbing dentists never bothered to tell me that I've been eroding my gums over the past few decades. Apparently they're also supposed to be measuring your gum depth every visit so it can be tracked, but they don't bother to do that either.
>> No. 37089 [Edit]
>>37088
My dentist does. Sounds like you've got a shitty dentist. You should never put pressure on your teeth when flossing. Being thorough and forceful are different.
>> No. 37090 [Edit]
>>37088
>they're also supposed to be measuring your gum depth every visit
Mine does too, but didn't really mention the strength thing. They have however told me that brushing in down to up for your lower teeth and up to down for the top teeth) can help in regenerating gums. Kind of like pushing the gums in the direction they should go.
>> No. 37091 [Edit]
>>37090
> can help in regenerating gums
I thought that gums cannot be regrow? That aside, it does seem like the technique of "brushing in down to up for your lower teeth and up to down for the top teeth" would be less irritating to the gums and also potentially more effective in cleaning stuff.

Post edited on 21st Dec 2020, 7:16pm
>> No. 37096 [Edit]
File 160862073096.jpg - (548.28KB , 800x800 , 9dcafdfe0078375b6e5fd3fb97e717e6.jpg )
37096
I've been thinking lately that human beings aren't meant to know the truth about a lot of thing. They're meant to believe in comfortable delusions. Maybe the truth is poisonous to human beings.

There's just the abyss. The reality that existence itself is completely indifferent to anyone or anything. No matter how badly one or more people suffer, it really doesn't make a difference. It really doesn't matter. There really isn't a good reason to care.

People always say "we're just a tiny blue dot in the middle of nowhere, so we should get along", but they don't follow through with this thinking and acknowledge it also means it wouldn't matter if this tiny blue dot completely vanished. None of their moral hang-ups matter either.

I'm afraid that if people knew I felt this way, they kill me. Knowing that me dying wouldn't make any difference at all makes it even scarier.

Post edited on 21st Dec 2020, 11:06pm
>> No. 37098 [Edit]
>>37096
What you said made me think of Lovecraft.
As I see it, being "insignificant" is not a thought that bothers me. It's a matter of size? It seems quite banal, even if we're a tiny fraction, being unique means we're not insignificant at all. And if we're not unique and the universe is full of life then there's so much to see and learn to be abandoned to existential dread.

>The reality that existence itself is completely indifferent to anyone or anything.

I don't know enough about it so I will not talk about it as if I knew, but I suspect modern science has put some doubts into that.
>> No. 37099 [Edit]
>>37096
The population is becoming increasingly atheist so I think most feel that way anyway, they just get on with their lives. Personally whether I matter or not in the grand scheme of things is irrelevant to me and doesn't change anything at all.
>> No. 37100 [Edit]
>>37096
>The reality that existence itself is completely indifferent to anyone or anything. No matter how badly one or more people suffer, it really doesn't make a difference. It really doesn't matter. There really isn't a good reason to care.

That's silly. So if your house catches fire you won't move from your chair and let yourself get carbonized and suffer an agonizing death just because 'the universe' doesn't care about you? You're failing to see the basics here. Pain sucks and is reason enough to care. Other people's suffering sucks and you should care about them too. Ultimatelu, not getting carbonized and dying as a fireball matters to you and that should suffice. Of course the universe doesn't care, the universe is not a person. It's not that the universe is indifferent, it's more like the universe is not human and you shouldn't expect it to have feelings for you.

You're wishing for some anthropomorphized version of the universe where it's a cool bro that will realign the cells of people with cancer and cure your toothache and getting scared that isn't the case. Well, maybe the problem here is that you want to be religious. Because it seems very clear to me you're have the secular version of doubting that God exists.

>I'm afraid that if people knew I felt this way, they kill me.
It's more likely they would try to explain to you how silly your line of thought is just like I'm doing now. I can see religious people trying to convince you that God does care and all bad things will be fixed on some next life. That's another vastly more likely possibility.
>> No. 37101 [Edit]
>>37099
I think it matters less whether someone is a proclaimed atheist than whether they believe in inherent values of right and wrong. The christian and the atheist will probably agree with at least one thing that both believe is either morally wrong or right. Like, murder, or violent rape, or stuff like that. Now being a species with a need to survive, this makes sense to have values like that. But realistically the moral compass of the human race, if it even exists, is about as objective as the belief of anything or anyone that values their own survival above other things. If you have a moral compass I'm not trying to shit on you and say you're some dumb little sheep who isn't a smart nihilist like me. Frankly I believe morals only need to have value to the person holding them, as I also believe this is the only way they exist at all in our universe in any substance. Morals are just an idea, the concept of a concept. I don't think even god could have the power to make meaning exist, because I don't think it's a valid concept. It's not even about whether god is real or not in my opinion, right and wrong just aren't real, they aren't valid, you can't create something that has no frame of reference to our universe or the laws of causality themselves. It would just float away.
>> No. 37102 [Edit]
>>37101
It does matter if one is religious as if one is religious they will believe that all suffering happens for a reason and that there is a greater power and a greater good, they would also view this life as temporary and a trial that will lead onto something different.

Morals and religion(which itself is often created to dictate morals) are important, they enable society to function properly. All though it is becoming less important as we know have such a strong legal authority, the power to enforce it and increasingly the technology to find any wrong doing that whether you believe something like murder is wrong or right is irrelevant, you would be dumb to do it anyway.
>> No. 37103 [Edit]
>>37102
I think most atheists still believe in right and wrong, even if they give other reasons the average atheist tends to be a progressive, strongly of the liberal inclination. Classically liberal or otherwise I believe the distinction is actually not important, everything after the fall of the monarchy and state religion is the same liberalism to me. They would probably be pretty upset if I or someone else told them that their beliefs are not objective. The part of their brain that creates moral reaction is no different from a religious persons, only the specific morals differ and then only in what the "best" way to provide a morally good life for people is. As for the last part of your post, well, I think some element of that has always existed and also that some element of people obeying moral law will always exist. Ironically I think the "good" atheist who intellectually acknowledges the reality of his position on theology is rare. I think the atheist who both acknowledges it and personally lacks any moral preferences is even rarer or maybe non-existent. In a sense some of this is just because people will naturally feel upset if something bad happens to THEM, thus even the nihilist will despair at his own supposed unimportance rather than switching a flip in his brain to turn off his emotions.

Although the distinction between belief in a greater good, and having a belief in both a greater good AND a greater power, is important. Though it may come down to being as simple as whether someone tends towards collectivism or individualism or not.
>> No. 37104 [Edit]
>>37103
Yes they do. Whether one is christian or not we still live in a christian society. Our values and morals have been passed down to us through the ages and while it has changed the core beliefs have remained as they are intrinsically a part of the media we consume and the way we are brought up. However, atheist are not held to it in the same way christian are and so are more likely to take liberties with it or go against it if it somehow benefits them, after all they are not going to go to hell for breaking a moral they will just feel bad about it(provided they feel they can get away with it).
>> No. 37105 [Edit]
File 160864005686.png - (1.08MB , 1280x720 , migodo.png )
37105
Please take your religious discussion to /tat/. >>/r/15
>> No. 37106 [Edit]
File 160864036456.jpg - (244.30KB , 1266x900 , lolibooru 294592 heart_of_string horn_ornament hos.jpg )
37106
>>37100
>Other people's suffering sucks and you should care about them too.
Why? I avoid suffering myself because it's unpleasant, but I also know that my suffering is inconsequential. If my own suffering doesn't matter, why would another person's?

You're failing to understand my premise. Your entire way of thinking seems to be based on things you mistakenly believe are facts("basics"). You lack mental flexibility.

>>37105
Never mentioned religion.

Post edited on 22nd Dec 2020, 4:34am
>> No. 37108 [Edit]
>>37106
>I also know that my suffering is inconsequential
You have this very silly idea that if the universe is not an anthropomorphized buddy of yours that cares about your fate then nothing is of consequence. It doesn't make sense. Pain and suffering is enough of a consequence for action, avoiding suffering is an end on itself.

>my premise.
Your premise is that you want the universe to have human feelings for you and you're feeling dejected because it obviously doesn't. In other words you just want God to exist. >>37105 is actually right. You're having religious breakdown even if you swapped a couple of words here and there. Eitherway, this is not the place to discuss it.
>> No. 37109 [Edit]
File 160865014181.jpg - (133.55KB , 697x523 , 83c111d436e311e244460dc07b2338c7.jpg )
37109
>>37108
>Pain and suffering is enough of a consequence for action
I've already explained why I would avoid pain. That doesn't transfer to anybody else though. I don't feel other people's pain and they don't feel mine.

>you want
Why are you putting words into my mouth and why do you seem so emotionally invested? I feel dejected because I feel alienated from others. They don't talk about things dispassionately as a matter of what's good or bad for society. They seem to really "care" when there isn't a real reason to, so I don't think they see what I do. I wouldn't mind the universe not caring if something else cared about me and gave me a sense of purpose and hope.

Why is the pondering thread not the one to discuss stuff like this? It's like your offended that I'm questioning something you hold near and dear.

Post edited on 22nd Dec 2020, 7:26am
>> No. 37110 [Edit]
>>37106
It's true, your suffering and the suffering of others does not matter at all and maybe sometimes we can even profit off it. But to say that anothers suffering is completely irrelevant and will not effect you nor could it effect you is wrong. If you live with a sister or brother or even have a neighbor that you are close with or even a boss or coworker you do not like but have to work with then her or his suffering does effect you. If your sister is suffering she is not going to be pleasant to be around and her suffering may cause direct issues to your life, she may become depressed and stop working or get fired lowering the wealth of the household, she may take it out on you etc, conversely if she is happy she will be easier to be around and her life may improve and thus improve yours with it and if you help her when she is suffering she may help you when you are suffering in turn. If you just ignore her or add to her suffering it will only effect you negatively in the long run. Even in a more distant manner it can effect you, even if you are a heartless slave driver, you can only push your slaves so far, causing them to suffer too much will cause rebellion and easing their suffering slightly may improve their efficiency.

So even if you had no emotions or morals whatsoever, the suffering of others is going to negatively effect you and cause you to suffer.

Post edited on 22nd Dec 2020, 7:42am
>> No. 37111 [Edit]
>>37110
That's a good point, but it only applies to people I'm involved with somehow. There are many more people whose circumstances have no effect on me. Most suffering is irrelevant to me then.

Post edited on 22nd Dec 2020, 8:23am
>> No. 37112 [Edit]
>>37111
>it only applies to people I'm involved with somehow
Which is everyone on the planet. I don't think it's difficult to see how humanity is closely connected, specially on this day and age. Those people who died on the London bombings because of a conflict half a world away would have plenty to say about that. That's just one tiny example out of numerous anyone could give, you don't even need to think that hard really.
>> No. 37113 [Edit]
File 160865807825.jpg - (445.98KB , 850x867 , sample_0806c0e25ff19dc904e69e517c135f2e.jpg )
37113
>>37112
Right now, somebody, more than one person probably, is dying or getting murdered or raped or is a sex slave. All of those people in nursing homes who barely know what's going on around them or those who have a terminal illness too. I'll never know anything about those people. I probably wouldn't like them even if I knew them. I can't see how they affect me. My connection to some average stranger on the other side of the planet is more distant than the insects outside my home. They wouldn't admit it unless provoked, but I think everybody feels the same about me.

People always talk about shared humanity or whatever in an abstract way, but almost all people don't think like me. They don't value what I value. They constantly disappoint me. I'd accept a machine or a fish that thinks like me before a person who doesn't.

Why do you feel that connection? Do you really like people that much?

Post edited on 22nd Dec 2020, 9:32am
>> No. 37114 [Edit]
>>37113
I'm not talking about some weird spiritual connection here, or some empathy thing, I'm talking about literally, you're closely connected with those people. Food prices raise when there's more demand for it somewhere, it affects you. People littering the streets affect you. People using cars affect the air you breath. All the services provided to you so your toilet doesn't overflow and you drown in your own waste, that's all people's doing. All around you people are doing things that affect you directly, that's what I'm talking about. Those millions of people with cancer and that died of cancer were a force for medical research and advancement on treatment, so if you ever have cancer yourself, the only reason treatment exists is because other people had that and died before you. The only reason you have clothing is because people have been cold for thousands of years and collectively came up with an idea on how to not freeze to death. Literally everything you use, consume and even the things you think about, come from other people. The very language you use even. You didn't invent English did you? The very ideas you use and concepts and wording, you only have that because of your connection with other people.

You don't need to know a person for a connection to exist. For sure you don't need to like people for that connection to exist, it exists regardless of your wanting. It's literally all around you. I didn't think I would have to explain that people live in a society but there you go, I just did.
>> No. 37115 [Edit]
>>37114
Any of the people you mentioned could have been swapped out for others. Including myself. Different people could have been born or gotten illnesses or have other bad things happen to them. People as an amorphous blob is different from them as individuals. As individuals, almost everybody is replaceable and disposable, if they're even useful to society to begin with, which not everybody is. What about neets? What about those sex slaves?

None of what you've written proves that individuals' suffering affects me. People suffer, yes, but they could be anybody. Society can handle a lot more suffering before it perceptibly changes anything for me. Tasmania could vanish and I'd barely notice it. More and more things are also being automated, so the significance of other people is diminishing.

Post edited on 22nd Dec 2020, 10:39am
>> No. 37116 [Edit]
>>37115
Well it's like I said, it doesn't matter if you personally know them, if you consider them individuals or amorphous blobs. The connection exists. Those people are real and affect you directly. That post is going to be my only attempt at explaining that, if you still think you're floating in empty space independent of everyone but mom and dad then that's how you'll be leaving this conversation. Sorry.
>> No. 37117 [Edit]
>>37114
Most of the things you're talking about actually came from a very small set of people that developed it in near-isolation. For clothes and basic tools, that is almost always developed separately by different tribes. For language, there's certainly a larger group but I'm sure I would still be speaking some language that would work well enough without it. Also this whole global reliance thing is more forced than anything else, considering it wouldn't even be true 150 years ago. It really does amaze me how some people are already in the mindset that this is one giant earth family.
>> No. 37118 [Edit]
>>37116
You're really hung up on the idea that every single person is important, but completely ignore every example I've given where that's not the case. You can't explain to me how a neet in South Korea jumping off a building changes anything for me. If you tried, it would be contrived, tortured and unverifiable. Some people are undeniably more important than others in the sense you're talking about. That means there's no intrinsic worth to a person.

I never thought I was "floating in empty space independent of everyone but mom and dad" as you put it so condescendingly. As an oh so worldly person, do you really think if the murder rate in Laos increased by 2% your life would change in any way?
>> No. 37119 [Edit]
>>37118
I never wanted to prove every single person is important. Importance is relative anyway, I just wanted to show that living in a society literally means you're connected to a huge number of people and that those people, regardless if you know them or not, have a real impact in your life. That's literally all I was trying to convey. I guess it's so obvious that you assumed I wanted to prove something else? Because I wasn't. That's it.

As for some people being more important than others, I suppose that's true, relatively speaking. For sure the president of the US have a lot more impact in history than the guy asking for change in front of the grocery store. But then again, I don't know how that factors into what I was trying to prove earlier. Again, maybe the stuff I was talking about is so obvious it looked like I wanted to prove something else. And I agree, there's no intrinsic worth to a person. How could it be? All value is attributed, including the value used to claim the president is more important than the panhandler. I would not be able to point out a single thing, human or otherwise, that has intrinsic value.

As for the murder rates in Laos, yes, I do think everything has consequences. To make a very long story short I agree with the propositions of chaos theory and the butterfly effect.
>> No. 37120 [Edit]
File 16086682179.png - (704.56KB , 660x918 , 8c7fcb98353fae648a41413f570bb05f.png )
37120
>>37119
If you were responding to this
>If my own suffering doesn't matter, why would another person's?
By explaining that people are necessary for society to function, you misinterpreted what I meant by matter.

With the butterfly effect, you're assuming the consequent effect(s) to you has time to reach you before you die, which I don't think is true most of the time. Even if everything that happened to anyone would effect the stuff your body is made of eventually, the time it would take for that to happen could exceed your lifespan. Not everything will effect everything else greatly enough within a time frame short enough to "care" about most things. The eventual effect(s) might also be so small it might as well not have happened because the mind doesn't have enough reason to be distressed by it.

Post edited on 22nd Dec 2020, 12:19pm
>> No. 37121 [Edit]
File 160867335593.jpg - (386.09KB , 600x647 , pkc.jpg )
37121
>>37120
Hm, no, the only thing I ever meant and repeatedly said is that you're directly affected by a lot more people than you might assume at first.
But I see. Basically you're defending yourself from statements I never made and of course in your own view I'm distorting what you meant. Classic internet retarded discussion. And now you're getting ready for another round, trying to deflect things about the butterfly effect I never said. I merely said it exists and there you go imagining arbritary time frames and life spans and whatever else.

I'm not doing this again for another subject matter anon. I guess the only thing we can take from this is what a monumental waste of time arguing online is for all parties involved. Here's a gen1 poke for you. Be well.
>> No. 37122 [Edit]
File 160867520646.jpg - (309.03KB , 900x975 , 4c427a9071ccec427556c7b16ac10dbb.jpg )
37122
>>37121
Do you think every single discussion where two people disagree on something is an argument? Do you really think I was "deflecting" and "defending myself" like I'm concerned about my reputation? From my perspective, the response you just posted came out of nowhere.

>the only thing I ever meant and repeatedly said
Why did you reply to me with this >>37110 then? What was the point of that? Unless you assumed I think something I don't, and were trying to convey a message to me that you thought I was unaware of, there's no reason for you to have.

>I merely said it exists
No you didn't. You didn't randomly mention the butterfly effect for no reason what so ever and with no insinuation of a point as a random non sequitur.

>do you really think if the murder rate in Laos increased by 2% your life would change in any way?
>As for the murder rates in Laos, yes, I do think everything has consequences. To make a very long story short I agree with the propositions of chaos theory and the butterfly effect.
What could this possibly mean? Could it be that you implied your life would change when you wrote "yes... everything has consequences" because otherwise there would be literally no point in writing that? Could it be that you mention the butterfly effect as proof it would effect you because that's directly related to what we were talking about and otherwise mentioning it would have no point? No, that's stupid. Conversations are stupid.

Post edited on 22nd Dec 2020, 2:27pm
>> No. 37123 [Edit]
>>37122
>Why did you reply to me with this >>37110 then?
I didn't.
>> No. 37159 [Edit]
>>37101
>>37102
"At the entrance of the modern time stands the “God-man.” At its exit will only the God in
the God-man evaporate? And can the God-man really die if only the God in him dies? They did
not think of this question, and thought they were through when in our days they brought to a
victorious end the work of the Illumination, the vanquishing of God: they did not notice that Man
has killed God in order to become now — “sole God on high.” The other world outside us is indeed
brushed away, and the great undertaking of the Illuminators completed; but the other world in us
has become a new heaven and calls us forth to renewed heaven-storming: God has had to give
place, yet not to us, but to — Man. How can you believe that the God-man is dead before the Man
in him, besides the God, is dead?"
I think this quote encompasses what I'm saying. It comes directly after Stirner explains how the ideologies seeking freedom elected to pursue it by removing people of things and thus freeing them of them, i.e. freedom FROM god, freedom FROM wealth (as opposed to freedom of wealth), freedom FROM dissenting opinions. What good does it do to remove god when you immediately replace it with mankind as a new, sacred object which must not be transgressed upon?
>> No. 37161 [Edit]
>>37159
Mankind is more flexible and obviously not infallible, so it's a less strict master. Life has tended to improve when mankind is placed above God as described in a book that is not allowed to change. Also, not everything is about "freedom".
>> No. 37162 [Edit]
>>37161
>Life has tended to improve when mankind is placed above God
In this context, barely. Mankind here refers to the vague idea of "mankind" as some magical standard to respect and revere.
>Also, not everything is about "freedom"
Freedom doesn't exist.
>> No. 37169 [Edit]
In Conan the Barbarian, the sentiment that two stood against many is heroic. But if one stands against many, is he a villain by default?
>> No. 37193 [Edit]
What do mangaka do during hiatus? Is the money they have enough to cover all their expenses or do they take side jobs in between? And who would be considered to be standing at the turning point in between the two possibilities? It is very hard for me to believe that someone com go for years or almost a decade without releasing anything and doesn't even have to work, even if the person may be famous.
>> No. 37194 [Edit]
>>37193
I remember reading in Bakuman that even if you have a particularly successful work you barely make enough money to live a few years from it so you have to work again quickly, and that sounded like it was the authors talking about themselves after the huge hit that was Death Note.
On the other hand I remember Takimoto living years without working from Welcome to the NHK money, and that was just a light novel, but he also returned to being a hikki so maybe his expenses were just really low.
>> No. 37206 [Edit]
>>37193
They can still make money from royalties, like most authors do.
>> No. 37267 [Edit]
File 160985165637.jpg - (133.17KB , 1245x701 , 20210105.jpg )
37267
>>37169
No. One man vs the world always makes the one as heroic.
>> No. 37329 [Edit]
File 161024589978.jpg - (11.22KB , 243x216 , FUT7.jpg )
37329
Presentation does matter!
>> No. 37339 [Edit]
Do you ever wonder what the world would be like if everybody had your spending habits? So much money is spent on commercials for smart phones, fastfood, snakes and other assorted crap. I have a smart phone, but the next time I'll be replacing it will be in like 10 years probably. I never physically go the movie theater to watch a movie on the rare occasions that I do so. I don't pay for music either. I don't eat dorritoes or burgerking. I wear the same few articles of clothing for years until it gets worn down basically. Would the whole economy collapse if everybody spent money like me?

Post edited on 10th Jan 2021, 9:03pm
>> No. 37340 [Edit]
>>37339
Not really, although it bothers me how terrible some people are with money, my sister works a full time job yet still lives in a share house and has no savings, I am in a better financial situation than her and I am on welfare, I'm in a better financial situation than most people in my family for that matter...

Money has to be spent at some point so it would not actually impact the economy as a whole just the products in it. If people stopped buying clothes all of the time it would raise the cost of clothing and probably encourage higher standards than the mass produced garbage we have as the market for mass produced garbage would be diminished. It would boost the money being spend in other fields too, if they are not spending it on clothes and other garbage then they will probably either spend it on more expensive goods like cars and jewelry or they will save up even more and use it to purchase property. Either way it ends up in the economy somehow.
>> No. 37341 [Edit]
>>37339
In my case the following would go bankrupt:
Fashion industry, Soda and junk food, alcohol, tobacco, lottery, sports, hollywood and tv producers, concerts, social media...
The list is too long, but it'd be great
>> No. 37342 [Edit]
File 161038943070.jpg - (334.45KB , 2048x1450 , 1610333582107.jpg )
37342
>>37339
I had, actually. I would like to think the world would use less resources but there's other things I spend money in.
I don't buy clothes, I don't own an smpartphone, I don't drive, I don't use heat, I don't travel, I've never been in a plane or a ship, I don't drink alcohol, I use the cheapest internet available. In the other hand, I like fastfood, I like to go the movies sometimes (is it that bad? some people has critized me for this in the past) and I like model kits and physical games. I guess most of the economy, except the cultural japanese one and some few fastfood places, would disappear if all made the same. But I have an austerity mindset so I actually feel guilty about the few things I spend money in, if something.
>> No. 37343 [Edit]
>>37339
Industries around the world would just find alternative means of getting your money, and more aggressive ways of manipulating people into spending money.
If everyone only bought a smart phone once every ten years, Phone companies would either cut the life span of all phones by more than half, or double their prices. Same would go for most other things. The only reason we get away with what we do, is because we're a very small minority that isn't worth paying attention to.
>> No. 37352 [Edit]
I just can't seem to figure out where Virginia falls in the regional breakup of the U.S. Is it south? North? Mid-Atlantic? Appalachia? No one seems to agree on this and I can't decide either. It's got a little bit of both but not enough of any one.
>> No. 37357 [Edit]
You know what's weird? I have no recollection of how I got here in the first place. I have great memory and remembers many threads from years ago, but I feel like I just woke up one day and the address was in front of me. Even the mentions screenshot at /pic/ doesn't have any mention of this site in that time. I wonder if some neets broke into my house and turned my computer on and left the site there.
>> No. 37358 [Edit]
>>37357
You're welcome.
>> No. 37361 [Edit]
>>37357
Can't say the same, I remember seeing it mentioned as an meetup location after a possible deletion of /a/ many years ago. Weird to think I would actually leave /a/ of my own accord first.
>> No. 37408 [Edit]
File 161131791564.jpg - (178.93KB , 920x1280 , 1caf9b93809fac0cdb518d50f0324d54.jpg )
37408
If a normal person with no prior interest was kidnapped and forced to watch anime for five years, when they're released, what do you think their perception of anime would be?
>> No. 37409 [Edit]
File 161132383266.png - (1.07MB , 642x900 , petting a chipmunk.png )
37409
>>37408
They would probably hate it even more and start crying to everyone that anime is inherently traumatic and should be banned or something.
>> No. 37458 [Edit]
I wonder about multiplayer games in shithole countries. I live in a third-world place, and my internet connection is too bad for playing online. I can't even play mahjong. My internet provider changed multiple times, the result is the same, good enough for me to download crap but not enough to try and play something with someone.
>> No. 37477 [Edit]
File 161188648726.jpg - (1.00MB , 1000x668 , a411a9bd055ebf7d6b3f2b0ad791842a.jpg )
37477
Do you ever feel like your entire life revolves around mood altering distractions? Music, exercise, food, sleep, masturbation, escapist media. Everything else is work you do to feel accomplished, acquire resources, or gain more access to distractions. Maybe it's just me, but I feel like everything I do is for the sake of manipulating myself into making being alive tolerable.
>> No. 37478 [Edit]
>>37477
My daily life alternates between obsessively worrying about some trivial thing, wanting to kill myself, and distracting myself from all that by watching anime. Usually it cycles in that order: I'll get worked up over something and spent dozens of hours with it on my mind
>> No. 37479 [Edit]
File 16119015438.png - (600.63KB , 1060x1060 , 7dcaeaa9124285c8fa510c115fc01e9b.png )
37479
>>37477
When I was a teenager I indulged in my hobbies because I enjoyed them. But even back then I think there was some amount of coping involved. Now half of the reason why I participate in most of my hobbies is to cope. To think differently, to feel differently, and see differently than what the real world makes me. It doesn't feel good at all that it has to be this way and I hate it but I think that's all that I'm used to and can even imagine. Almost as if the pretty illusion was taken down for me a little early on in my life and I felt the need for something to replace it or some way to escape unpleasant realities. That last part is part of why I enjoy sleeping as much as I do. If I don't have any nightmares or nice dreams that make me feel bad when I wake up then I don't have to think or see anything at all and a peaceful void is the best I can get.
>> No. 37481 [Edit]
>>37477
Distractions from what, exactly? I think it's real life that distracts me from the cool things, actually.
>> No. 37482 [Edit]
File 161193755032.jpg - (107.65KB , 850x611 , sample_b45b3826fbfb9e5d2b84eff0f9cfde22.jpg )
37482
>>37481
Ageing, encroaching death, existential dread, lack of companionship, powerlessness, alienation.
>> No. 37483 [Edit]
>>37482
I would like to think most of those aren't real things.
>> No. 37484 [Edit]
>>37483
So you're distracting yourself then.
>> No. 37485 [Edit]
>>37484
What I meant is, most of those things, and what we call "real life", aren't necessarily more real than other things, sometimes they can even be mere tricks of the mind. For a monk the real could be enlightenment and all those, the actual distractions and fake worries. I just think sometimes we want to focus on things that make us feel bad and we show disdain for things that make us feel good, all based on the supposed objective importance of things, and maybe it's not the best course of action.
>> No. 37486 [Edit]
File 161196280329.jpg - (94.95KB , 850x567 , sample_923599055a1041cf5a9b9ee5d6f0c038.jpg )
37486
>>37485
So delusion then. The most real things are what you can see around you when sober and attentive. The more "enlightened" you become, the more you deny what's right in front of you for things you can't see or measure. Sitting outside and just watching things live and die without any explanation tells you far more about the world than closing your eyes and looking inward.
>> No. 37487 [Edit]
>>37482
That is a heavenly picture

>>37486
>The more "enlightened" you become, the more you deny what's right in front of you
There's that famous quote "Before enlightenment; chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment; chop wood, carry water." Even if there is such a thing as enlightenment, so long as you have to partake in the material world I'm not sure how much use it will be. If you go by some schools then meditation is a way to calm down or completely suspend your thoughts. In some general sense I guess that's a form of "distraction" as well – you're distracting yourself from the world around you by rejecting participation in it entirely.
>> No. 37491 [Edit]
>>37486
>>37487
I don't think that has anything to do with meditation or enlightenment, but if something it's the complete opposite. To start with, you don't close your eyes to meditate, and some could even tell you you don't need a particular static position either, it's an state of the mind while the rest is accesory.
But it was just an example and I wouldn't like to debate something completely different now. I just wanted to introduce a different viewpoint, that maybe we can decide what's important and real and what's not.
Could be meditation, math, art, playing videogames, doesn't matter.
>> No. 37558 [Edit]
File 161257158353.jpg - (30.95KB , 500x501 , __original_drawn_by_kawaii_rowa__c712595dcd75bc4dc.jpg )
37558
What is the appeal of NTR and why is it so popular in Japan? At the very least I've been seeing so much of it dominating recent doujin(especially eroge) releases.
>> No. 37562 [Edit]
File 161257420518.gif - (1.80MB , 500x552 , f1dbbc34393fda44653c1a769580ccc6.gif )
37562
>>37558
I think NTR is specifically made so people self-insert as the girl. Guy 1 doesn't do anything, and Guy 2 wouldn't matter if he didn't have Girl.
>> No. 37564 [Edit]
>>37558
Taboo and low self-esteem. People there tend to have low self-esteem and feel repressed, so stepping on someone else or being stepped on is something they feel strongly towards. NTR elicits strong emotions and strong emotions like arousal, anger and excitement tend to get mixed up in people's head. Adrenaline and dopamine is adrenaline and dopamine regardless of the context.

>>37562
A common misconception is that people choose who they self-insert as. Really it's up to the author to pick which character's perspective the reader adopts. Kind of hard to self-insert as someone who barely shows up, doesn't have drawn eyes and doesn't have any thought bubbles.

Post edited on 5th Feb 2021, 5:38pm
>> No. 37570 [Edit]
File 161260265635.jpg - (143.05KB , 1983x1590 , __cirno_touhou_drawn_by_kae_karee__4a5e3033e915e46.jpg )
37570
>>37562
>>37564
I did a little bit of research and it seems that both of you hit the mark. There are some who are attracted to NTR because they self-insert as the female which I personally see as somewhat absurd and difficult to make sense of. The more common reasoning seems to be about domination/empowerment and degradation/corruption which is the running theme in most erodoujin anyway. But with domination, shouldn't netori be more popular than netorare then? In any case, perhaps I've simply grown too jaded of fetishism in general.

>>37562
Specifically I've seen comments about sexual liberation when self-inserting as the female.

>>37564
That makes sense, suppose it works the same way the suspension bridge effect does. I don't necessarily think that that's the case. The author does for the most part have control over who they want the reader to relate/self-insert with but ultimately the reader will only be able to relate to characters they feel an affiliation to. There's a reason why silent protags are a thing. Personally I find it hard to self-insert as a well-defined character. Perhaps it all has to do with one's sense of identity, people with a stronger sense of self-identity might have a harder time self-inserting as a character.
>> No. 37573 [Edit]
>>37570
>the reader will only be able to relate to characters they feel an affiliation to
Come to think of it, self-inserting as anybody isn't necessary. A reader can just be an observer. Empathizing with a character isn't the same as "self-inserting" as them and any character can be empathized with if the author focuses on their perspective. Even something like camera angles can contribute to this. Eroge is a visual medium.

Post edited on 6th Feb 2021, 6:32am
>> No. 37574 [Edit]
>>37573
You are correct. Thinking about it whenever I engage in any otaku media, I only put myself in the role of an observer of said subject matter. In fact I suspect I might be incapable of actually self-inserting which might be why I find the whole "self-insert" perspective difficult to understand. That might explain why I find it hard to enjoy certain things people do.
>> No. 37575 [Edit]
File 161267833768.png - (102.43KB , 380x295 , 1570943630410.png )
37575
Self-inserting is just an insulting buzzword to shame people who enjoy relatable characters and scenarios.
>> No. 37681 [Edit]
>>37558
I think it has something to do with hatred towards your mother. Especially if that hatred is repressed and full of guilt. That and a fear of intimacy. At least that was the case for me. Polite spoiler for being rather unsavory content.

The kink is pretty degrading towards everyone involved. To the cuck for obvious reasons, to the woman for having her emotions so easily swayed by sex, and to the bull for being either some dirty pervert or shameless fuckboy who only wants sex. The bull and the cuck really have the same insecurity, the main difference is how adequate they feel. They hate their mother and want to punish her. The cuck wants to punish her by increasing her milage (so he will be worthy of her). The bull wants to punish her by taking her current man down a notch and treating her like a sex object so that he can demand respect and feel worthy.

There also seems to be an element of evading responsibility/attention whoring. The cuck is afraid to take action and sees that as a bad quality so he enlists the help of the bull who's quite insecure in his own right and chest pounds like an annoying attention whore. Neither one of which are good behaviors to have.

This entire thing probably sounds like kooky Freudian nonsense. I'm not sure how to explain it but given my own experiences and the endemic mommy issues in Japanese society I think I'm onto something. I used to be cursed with an immense attraction to both netori/netorare and I lost it after an intense drug experience where I came to terms with hatred towards my mom. Thank god. I hated having that fetish. If only mommy would have held me more I never would have got into that garbage.

>> No. 37723 [Edit]
File 161370251061.jpg - (380.74KB , 850x1223 , sample_8dcfcc3e680d03f9eae560a14fa9a297.jpg )
37723
Does anybody else find it ironic how the more niche a hobby is, the more you have to socialize with others to learn about it? Niche hobbies are associated with less social people, but the more popular a hobby is, the more resources will exist so that people can engage with and learn about it without having to interact with other people.

Something like chess has a million books about it and you can play online with a computers whenever you feel like it. Following American, syndicated sports can be the least social interest in the world if you want it to be.

Playing an obscure card game in a foreign language on the other hand is impossible without another person and you have to look for real-time chat rooms to ask people questions when you're first starting. IRC channels and private trackers are other forms of this.

In the past, anime fans had to rely on each other for files/vhs tapes and subbing, while now they don't most of the time because companies and impersonal third parties do all of that work for them. More niche material like doujinshi though still forces people to interact in a community structure.

Post edited on 18th Feb 2021, 6:45pm
>> No. 37724 [Edit]
>>37558
NTR fans are loyal (ironically; see how much support has-beens like MTSP get?) and support artists that create these sort of things, it really isn't that popular and most people dont care about the plot if the art is good. Cheating girl is one of the easiest and common porn plots. Also consider that most NTR media barely has any mention of it, and the guy usually doesn't even have a face, I doubt things where emotionally torturing the MC like xration's work is prominent has the same wide appeal.
It also comes down to what westerners see due to commissions, but that is a different topic.
>> No. 37733 [Edit]
I was checking my mal just now and realized that for the past year or so all I watched is slice of life shows with an all female cast pretty much. Didn't give a second thought about it because I had this happened to me before where the more miserable I feel the more lighthearted the stuff I watch gets but then I realized I've become the exact type of anime fan that Tomoko finds it to be the most disgusting of them all. I don't really mind what people would think of my watching habits but thinking Tomoko cringing at my anime list kinda bothered me. I'm bothered now. Damn it. Tried to watch Death Note and switched to New Game! after ep.1 because everything is too bleak.
>> No. 37735 [Edit]
>>37733
Oh yeah forgot to mention I stopped following the manga for a long while, thought about going back to it and checked ganganonline. The last several covers she's surrounded by an army of friends. Jesus Christ what the fuck happened..
ohwell
>> No. 37737 [Edit]
>>37733
And why does it matter what Tomoko thinks? Considering she listens to /plays BL eroge I don't think her "taste" is objectively any better.
>> No. 37739 [Edit]
>>37733
I don't think there's anything wrong with enjoying things that are light heated cute and generally pleasant. Why is it more socially acceptable to watch edgelord shit like deathnote? and something cute and fun like new game is bad? Sure deathnote has a more interesting and unique plot, but it's still pretty dang edgelord shit. Rather than assume there's something wrong with you for turning to wholesome entertainment, shouldn't you instead be asking what's wrong with a culture that encourages dark, violent, and depressing entertainment?

>>37737
Yeah she has no right to judge anyone. Even other women into similar stuff thought she was cringey, like when she got that VA to voice her all those embarrassing lines so she could rub off to them later.
>> No. 37741 [Edit]
>>37733
I think it's a path that a lot of people who are into otaku media are going to wound up into. I can partly sympathize with you being embarrassed by a character because I am also at a point where I probably value fictional characters more than real people. However, I always try to remind myself that at then end of the day they are ultimately a figment of another real person's imagination.

>>37739
I used to be put off by everything "kawaii" but having read/watched a relatively copious amount of "mature" medias, ultimately you realize that everything is still as formulaic and hackneyed as the people who complain about cgdct being boring and generic. Characters and plots aren't really as innovative as people think, things still fall into certain archetypes with a different coating.
>> No. 37744 [Edit]
>>37739
>it's still pretty dang edgelord shit
If it's wrong for people to judge others for liking moe, why is it okay for you to judge people for liking "non-wholesome edglord shit"?
>> No. 37749 [Edit]
>>37744
There's a sort of depravity that comes with enjoying graphic violence that you don't get with cute and family friendly media. Any culture, institutions, or persons, who think it's okay to enjoy watching an execution, but not okay to enjoy watching girls drink tea and chitchat, is screwed up to put it simply.
>> No. 37750 [Edit]
>>37749
I would argue it's the most normal thing in the world to enjoy violence. But, I think the same for cute things.
>> No. 37752 [Edit]
>>37750
Just because it's normal doesn't mean it is appropriate. That is probably the reason why the world is so screwed and is the point >>37749 is trying to make.
>> No. 37753 [Edit]
>>37750
Enjoying violence seems to be generally acceptable everywhere, and is only questionable when an individual shows an overly obsessive fixation with it. At that point friends and family might call into question the person's sanity, but probably not much more.
Enjoying cute things is only socially acceptable under certain situations. One prerequisite is being female, males who enjoy these things are considered weird creepy or gross, but homosexuals can often times get a pass on this. Another prerequisite is being rather young. Even if you're female, the older you get the less acceptable it becomes. This varies from one culture to the next. In eastern countries the age allotment is much higher than western ones. Women here over the age of say, 15, who still enjoy cute things will be met with some criticism and or mockery from their peers, it's considered childish and weird for anyone over a certain age. The only western groups I can think of who accept or even encourage wholesome media meanwhile, are the very religious ones. People outside of those groups would consider their media "lame" at best.
>> No. 37754 [Edit]
>>37752
You sound like those mainstream media reporters, reporting on violent videogames or something.
>> No. 37756 [Edit]
File 161392815710.jpg - (181.40KB , 850x567 , 7783A26E-6FB0-4586-B4A6-5987B4BD6FB1-15396-0000195.jpg )
37756
>>37753
"Wholesome media" is a dumb, fabricated concept invented when people stopped reading books and corporate heads got to decide most of what people consume. Tastes have changed and so have the corporate heads, but this milquetoast ideal has continued to permeate through the soccer mom infested anglo-sphere. 50s sitcoms are "wholesome". A lot of cute anime has loli, yuri or otherwise sexual undercurrents. You can ignore that and still enjoy those things, but using a label like wholesome implies there's unwholesome media, which is a destructive and restrictive notion,

Post edited on 21st Feb 2021, 9:24am
>> No. 37762 [Edit]
Sometimes I muse at the thought of conversing with creators whose works I admire. I wonder if I'd end up hating them as a person and vice versa or if we'd actually get along. How much is our enjoyment of an object dependent on us imposing our perspective on it? Throughout history there are many instances of creators accusing their audiences of misunderstanding their intent and creation. Similarly I've always sat on the idea of making something but sometimes wonder if it's better off not to due to earlier misgivings. Not too long ago, I read about a doujin artist "retiring" from drawing anything related to a series after an official announcement from said series discouraging people from depicting their characters suggestively.

Post edited on 21st Feb 2021, 4:33pm
>> No. 37763 [Edit]
>>37762
My opinion is that people can't own ideas. As soon as they put something out there for public viewing, it stops belonging to them. They can't decide how people interpret it or what derivatives they make. Money complicates things, but the internet allows this ideal to exist despite that.

>How much is our enjoyment of an object dependent on us imposing our perspective on it?
It's entirely dependent because you can't help but have a certain perspective on something. If you didn't, enjoying anything would be impossible.
>> No. 37766 [Edit]
File 161397933670.jpg - (202.99KB , 650x650 , df6e5c1c6a3b7dba98025ba41f836d27.jpg )
37766
I think I might have hipster tendencies. Even when a particular interest of mine is already niche and obscure, like a little known game, I gravitate towards less popular strategies and aspects of it. Maybe I don't like the idea of doing what everybody else does or maybe I think going on a less trod path will let me discover some kind of hidden knowledge. Either way, there's something rewarding to me about doing things in a way which most people don't. Not that I would inconvenience myself too much or keep doing something that doesn't work, but when it does work, it feels great.
>> No. 37767 [Edit]
>>37737
Because I cared a great deal about Tomoko for a long time at one point and the feeling is never really gone I suppose.
>>37739
Yeah, I don't think there's anything wrong about that. You know how she can be very judgemental though. I guess I was equally harsh on others (in my mind only) at her age as well. I think it's that time when having taste is more important than escaping and that's when you feel it's only natural to bash what other people like. Maybe I'm completely wrong about this, I don't know. I'll spend some points today on gangan and check if she changed at all. The covers are not looking enticing, it's starting to look like a Hinatazaka46 cd cover, probably on purpose just to punish us, we'll see.
>>37741
I try to not remind myself of anything, dear anon.
>> No. 37769 [Edit]
>>37762
>I read about a doujin artist "retiring" from drawing anything related to a series after an official announcement from said series discouraging people from depicting their characters suggestively.

What series was that. Just curious.
>> No. 37770 [Edit]
>>37769
Not him, but I know love live did that.
>> No. 37772 [Edit]
>>37769
https://soranews24.com/2020/12/30/20-year-fan-artist-retires-from-rei-art-after-studios-no-evangelion-fan-porn-please-request/
>> No. 37776 [Edit]
>>37772
Glad I never gave them any money. Anno is officially the Japanese George Lucas.
>> No. 37777 [Edit]
>>37752
Violence is human nature. All of our modern comforts are the leftovers from massive multi billion dollar programs trying to drop as many city-killing warheads as possible as quickly as possible and as effectively as possible. Mans heart is in his weapons, don't ever forget that.
>> No. 37778 [Edit]
>>37777
I don't have a problem with violence in itself but rather the over glorification of it in medias and how it's representation is disconnected with how it is in reality. Also, the original poster was commenting on violence in contrast with "cute" media. My main issue with the post I quoted is primarily with the idea that something is acceptable if it's "normal".
>> No. 37781 [Edit]
File 161403571731.png - (125.65KB , 480x640 , c24e3e47cd493a4341313fa10c4bc998.png )
37781
>>37778
The closest thing I can think of as "violence glorification" in this context is Black Lagoon, and even that's seriously stretching it. Violence in anime/manga is virtually always shown to be mentally harmful to the person doing the violence too. Death Note is one of the most obvious examples of this.
>> No. 37784 [Edit]
>>37781
I would not really agree with that. In most anime either there is no message or the message is neutral to positive, it's very rarely negative.
>> No. 37786 [Edit]
>>37781
Token negative contextualization does not mean they are not still glorifying it or producing violence for viewer's pleasure. They may as well say "Don't do this at home blah blah this is bad blah blah BLAH who cares?! lets have some fun and start the gore porn!"
People don't watch slasher flicks for the interpersonal and emotional drama young adults face while trying to survive an overwhelming terrifying and unnatural habringer of their inescapable doom. No they want to see dumb horny teenagers get hacked to bits in fun and creative ways, with bonus points for cool or realistic looking practical effects.
Just as something like Hirigashi wasn't popular with kids for it's story of Rika's physiological torment and unwavering dedication to saving her friends while uncovering an evil plot ripping her small town apart, no dumb teens just wanted to see "killer lolis" and "bitches gettin pwned" while making funny faces.
>> No. 37787 [Edit]
File 161405584756.jpg - (365.15KB , 600x600 , 5160f2e1d0d56a396ac9fd64a2a3416a.jpg )
37787
>>37786
>slasher flicks
Pretty low bar. You can have both gratuitous violence and more fleshed out characters.

I question your definition of "glorying", which is a semantic issue. Manga and Anime are forms of entertainment, so anything in them is going to be there for the sake of entertainment. You can't have violence in a piece of media, but not for the sake of entertainment in some way or another. Even if it's supposed to make the viewer sad or whatever, it still serves the same purpose.

Your "problem" with violence portrayed incorrectly according to you comes across as soccer momish to be honest. Violent or otherwise "inappropriate" media, can't be blamed for the world's problems. That's confusing causation with correlation. Let "dumb teens" or sadists(like me) who get a kick out of stuff like Higurashi get their fix.
>> No. 37788 [Edit]
>>37787
I'm not saying violent media causes people to be violent. You may be confusing me with another anon? That or putting words in my mouth? If that's what you're into then so be it. I'm not here to judge anyone. I just think it's weird that it's more acceptable than non-violent media, I also think a person is kidding themselves if they think it's more than what it is, and that a person may as well be honest with themselves rather than make up excuses for what they like.
You're right by the way that our definitions probably differ a lot on what constitutes glorification of violence. One person might say it's a depiction of violence in a positive context, another would say it's a depiction of violence for entertainment regardless of context. I think it falls somewhere in between, as some media truly does intend to leave a person unsettled and bothered by scenes of graphic violence. It's there not for us to enjoy but make us feel something other than joy or excitement. There's certainly no way I could call something like that a glorification of violence.
>> No. 37789 [Edit]
>>37788
>I'm not saying violent media causes people to be violent
>Just because it's normal doesn't mean it is appropriate. That is probably the reason why the world is so screwed
I don't really know how to interpret this.
>> No. 37791 [Edit]
>>37789
I think it's better for everyone if when you realize a person starts to take himself too seriously or covertly defensive, just let it go. It's never worth it.
>> No. 37792 [Edit]
>>37789
Sorry if I'm being hard to understand. I don't mean to say it's causing violence, but that it's desensitizing people to it.
>> No. 37800 [Edit]
File 161416691525.jpg - (98.92KB , 640x640 , 234586945.jpg )
37800
Lately I'm having dreams about my classmates from middle school again. I never have dreams about my adult life. Even my unconscious or whatever it is seems to consider my adulthood to be too uneventful and boring to be thought about. It's impossible not to notice that the people behind the otaku industry also seem to have a special place for school life in their minds. Of course a lot of the media has students themselves as the target audience and that would partially justify it but I believe there's more to it than just that.

The forced socialization I went through in school was the peak of my social life. After that the "system" is done, it's up to you to pursue life in society. Once school is over, making any lasting connections with people become a lot harder and to some, probably next to impossible. That seems to be the case for everyone, not only to reclusive weirdos. If you start searching online stuff like "making friends after 30" "making friends as an adult" you'll find a staggering amount of articles and other stuff about it, including friendship making gurus because of course that's a thing it exists. Those articles always mention the obvious things. Look for people who share hobbies with you, attend to social events blablabla. Everything is so insipid. I think it overlooks the fact that something inside you goes bad and that innate ability to connect to people in a deeper level is broken by something. For some it was never that good in the first place.

I also realized recently that 99% of the conversations I have is with myself. Of all the things I think about, only 1% will ever be known to people on the outside. Maybe that's the case with everyone? Not that anything I think about is worth to be known of course.
>> No. 37801 [Edit]
>>37800
>that innate ability to connect to people in a deeper level
I've never really had that. In school, I had acquaintances I talked to only in the class we shared, who rotated on a yearly basis.
>> No. 37802 [Edit]
File 16141820313.png - (1.22MB , 1440x752 , 1588614764927.png )
37802
>>37800
The movie Stand by Me made a similar point;
>I never had any friends later on like the ones I had when I was 12. Jesus, does anyone?

I guess there's biological reasons, most adults only have friends as couples, a thing I find particularly horrifying, but it makes some sense. That would also explain the despair of males for achieving a (often horrible) life with a female since since that could also be perceived as the only way to avoid social ostracism.
Personally I also find my mind and dreams stuck in school years, but since those were hell you could say I'm perpetually stuck in hell.
The topic of social isolation has too many implications. I remember in my 20's reflecting of how I could spend 4 or 5 days without hearing my own voice and how weird that felt, how I created a self that had nothing to do with the self others could see and so many other thoughts.
>> No. 37888 [Edit]
>>37800
With most people it goes like that, no matter what your MS or HS school-life was actually like. Imagine it like this, your brain is like you were as a child, it is in a room full of toys. The child looks at the new toys, they are new, polished, but they are generic, no personality, and have no relations one to each other. Like a child, he wants to play with toys, making they act in storylines, but they are not interesting, and no emotion will be brought upon by witnessing their act. So he opens an old crest, and under the cobwebs there are old toys, battered and dusty, but they are interesting, they have intricate backgrounds and relations to each other, the baby wants to play.
So does your brain goes about making its stories. Being a loner or not has nothing to do with it. Per example, even if you spoke with no one and were friendless in your youth, and speaks with some adults in the present, it still doesn't matter. In adult life there's no fights, no people challenging the teacher, getting thrown out of the classroom, threatened with suspension, etc. Everything is mechanical, this form, sign this, and polite, there's no primal instinct involved. No food for the primitive mind. Moreover, everyone you met, you observed during years, the years of change, for most youngsters, and you saw they interacting with each other, everyone of them. This creates a complete personality for most of them.
>> No. 37892 [Edit]
>>37888
>In adult life there's no fights, no people challenging the teacher, getting thrown out of the classroom, threatened with suspension, etc.
I'm pretty sure stuff like that does happen in the "real world". Most adults, before they settle down, are obsessed with social relations, and afterwards they still care about politics and celebrity gossip. In school and now, other people have felt like empty husks who talking to is pointless. Students acting out like that is just more proof of them being alien to me and empty, obsessed with their petty, surface-level issues and lacking in introspection.
>> No. 37893 [Edit]
>>37892
>In school and now, other people have felt like empty husks who talking to is pointless. Students acting out like that is just more proof of them being alien to me and empty, obsessed with their petty, surface-level issues and lacking in introspection.

Are you completely sure you're superior to most people or do you voice those thoughts as a sort of self pep talk? I see people on imageboards saying similar things almost regularly and I never know what to think. I don't know if you guys are just lying to yourselves or you really know what you're talking about. I guess I'm just projecting my own doubts. I just feel like shit. No way out of it. I look around and people basically manage to put some order and comfort in the world, providing all sorts of things, from running water to anime and I don't know how to do anything. I suppose a lot of people like to talk about celebrities and other inconsequential things. But then I remember I laugh and cry over plots of fiction. I couldn't measure a difference of value between those things. All I do is to hide in here like a photophobic insect. It feels like such an absurd, herculean task to look down on people from this position, I just wonder if I'm more or less delusional than you. If I think about it, I can't make heads or tails of anyone. I guess I don't even know exactly what I'm asking you.
>> No. 37894 [Edit]
>>37893
I'm not "superior" to most people. I am better than them in a few ways which I personally value. I also consider my disregard and apathy for certain things most other people care about as virtues.

Post edited on 9th Mar 2021, 11:04am
>> No. 37895 [Edit]
>>37893
Personally I don't look down on people, since my self steem is so low I couldn't do that even if I wanted to. I just dislike people deeply. It's the same? I want to think it isn't.
Pure dislike, no need for moral justification or of any kind. The same way they dislike me, I dislike them, and that's all.
>> No. 37896 [Edit]
>>37892
It seems you did not understood what I meant. First, I did not meant that school students are more aware, or better in any way that relates to consciousness. I am perfectly aware of the husks phenomenon you mentioned. Fighting in the adult world is nowhere near as common, and that doesn't necessarily imply a higher state of consciousness but is mentioned merely for the fact that it is primal. In classroom you see humans beating others for fun, you see lust in reality, how it works, etc. First-hand. Politics and gossip have nothing to do with what I am talking about. That post was not meant as a praising of school students, but rather as as statement that in that time of budding youth the youngster comes in contact with lots of people doing primal things, in a more primal environment. This also happens outside of school, but in school there are more characters for the dreams.
>> No. 37933 [Edit]
File 161565812210.jpg - (1.54MB , 948x1500 , lolibooru 318249 sample.jpg )
37933
I like to fantasize a lot about what would happen if some kind of spiritual being approached me, like a demon or the spirit of the canal near my house. What would they say to me, and what would they want from me? I think I would really easily go along with whatever they wanted if I thought I could benefit from it.

Worshiping and doing the bidding of something like that is a comforting thought to me. Maybe because I'd like the sense of purpose, direction and meaning that would provide. A being who was superior to a human and I can see and talk to giving me directions and hope in life.

I also think about human sacrifice a lot. If I could just pick people to sacrifice in exchange for things without having to put myself at any risk, would I actually go through with it? I've thought many times that I would sacrifice my sister, who I don't like that much, for instantly learning Japanese. That's supposed to be a really horrible thought, but I think I would actually do it.

Having Kenkou Cross's artistic ability, or something comparable to that level, is worth about 500 people in my mind. Does that mean there's something wrong with me?
>> No. 37934 [Edit]
>>37895
This is the point I arrived at after many long years of debating similar justifications.
>> No. 37973 [Edit]
File 161671942939.jpg - (461.79KB , 850x600 , sample_1e489185917625ac5f2b1545a739a9dc.jpg )
37973
Do you ever think in the future there will be robotic companions and/or realistic vr people plug their brain into, and if people from then look at our posts from now, they'll think we're poor, pitiful, primitive saps? Maybe they'll wonder how we even managed to get by without such basic sources of happiness. Is that a comforting or distressing thought to you?
>> No. 37974 [Edit]
>>37973
Maybe not robotic companions yet, but combine recent advances in GANs ("this X does not exist") with some sort of booru-style on-demand generation and recommendation system and now we're getting close to some sort of hedonic tar pit. Considering that people probably already spend hours searching for images that appeal to them, I can certainly some people getting sucked in and spending most of their time flitting between sequences of images designed to be increasingly stimulating to them.
>> No. 37975 [Edit]
>>37974
>some sort of booru-style on-demand generation
I've fantasized about that kind of thing a lot.
>> No. 37976 [Edit]
>>37973
There will be robotic companions it's just a matter of what form that will take. It's likely to just be a more advanced Siri or whatever it is but with a robotic body that can do simple things or is just decorative.

VR will advance but it is still not clear whether true VR is actually possible. Google Glasses are supposed to come out soon and the US military is experimenting with HUD goggles for their infantry but it's still just a screen. Actually hooking the brain into a Virtual reality is something completely different. I'm not going to say it's impossible though and if it is possible it's probably just a matter of time.

I really don't like the idea, there are quite a few problems I have with it. It takes away what it is to be human, it's going to make people even more connected to social media and their devices than they are now, it's going to trivialise everything and make everything dull, it will open up a myriad of ways for big business to profit form us, manipulate us and otherwise interfere with our lives, people will not be able to separate what is real form what is fake and there are a myriad of other unforeseen calamities that could occur as we don't know what effect this would actually have on the brain or society and certainly not over the long term.
>> No. 37977 [Edit]
>>37973
Yes. Robotic companions could probably be realized earlier although probably "primitive" compared to our expectations as the previous post mentioned. The VR and technological gap could happen but it will still be a long way off, possibly not in our lifetime. To be able to progress to such a state we will have to first reevaluate our position as humans and the fabric of society must first change.

I think as >>37974 >>37976 mentioned, we are at a tipping point in human history because everyone have become so overly dependent on technology to a point where we are almost guided by it and not the other way around. I fantasize quite a bit about society in the distant future where the lines between human and technology have pretty much blurred.
>> No. 37980 [Edit]
>>37973
There will be no future, just fight for survival.
Our years will be remembered as the last moments of the golden era that was the second half of the 20th century. So not robot maids, cat girls or VR, people will be too busy struggling for the basic.
>> No. 37981 [Edit]
File 161674994258.png - (150.91KB , 800x1000 , 62727576_p1.png )
37981
>>37973
To whatever future robot person is reading these posts: I hope you're happy, because I'm not.
>> No. 37994 [Edit]
In the normandy landing, why didn't the front line troops off have some sort of shields? depictions and stories make it seem like the first ones off the ships would be meat shields for the people behind them. So why not carry 'something'? anything?
>> No. 37995 [Edit]
File
Removed
>>37994
I don't think there's any shields that could be effective against intense machinegun fire, and if they were the sacrifice in mobility wouldn't be worth it. Also the costs not assumable.
You need something like a tank to move that kind of armor, not just some dude.
Last time it must have been tried could have been in WWI, and it wasn't a practical idea; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_personnel_shield
Same with body armour, I remember some units of germans that even looked a little like medieval knights, but at that point modern war wasn't about that.
Besides that, the idea of Normandy wasn't to send waves of men against enemy fire until they could surpass the german defenses, there was a lot of previous work to avoid that, so most of the landings meet with barely any resistance. Only Omaha and Juno didn't go that well.
>> No. 37996 [Edit]
>>37995
Sorry, I completely forgot I couldn't post any 3D pictures here.
>> No. 37997 [Edit]
>>37995
I guess that part might be a bit exaggerated then. Seems weird, but I guess it can't be helped if the impracticality outweighs the benefits.
>> No. 38020 [Edit]
>>38019
Sounds like you're scapegoating. This isn't 4chan where there's hundreds of posts a day to occupy your attention.

Post edited on 3rd Apr 2021, 1:31pm
>> No. 38024 [Edit]
Sometimes I wonder what is the point of wasting my time on imageboards, when I could just watch anime and play video games.
>> No. 38026 [Edit]
>>38024
There is no point, you actually are wasting time
Just like me
>> No. 38039 [Edit]
>>16448
I wonder if anyone ever noticed that the previous thread is actually >>2253. >>15685 is a daily report thread.

>>38024
>>38026
I likewise spend too much time on imageboards. As >>17224 put it,
>imageboards are fucking addictive.
But I don't think it's always entirely a waste. However, it'd probably do me well to limit my usage of them and other similar timesinks that detract from time I could instead spend doing more enjoyable things.
>> No. 38061 [Edit]
File 161845340159.jpg - (672.49KB , 1080x1080 , 683bf2f7e82b540b9cb352e8fb4569ed.jpg )
38061
Do you ever think about how many people have done the same things as you on a particular day? Or if anybody has ever done the thing you've done? For example, how many people played a dreamcast game on an emulator today? How many people read x visual novel today? Was it just me, or was there someone else? Are there days 0 people do this particular thing?

If you make a sandwich with rye bread, roast beef, tzatziki Sauce tomatoes and white cheddar, has anybody else made a sandwich with those exact ingredients before(yes, because I did)? Or am I first and last person who will ever eat this?
>> No. 38062 [Edit]
>>38061
If you shuffle a deck of cards thoroughly enough, you will be the only person to have experienced that specific arrangement.
>> No. 38064 [Edit]
>>38061
I do think about that often.
And I think the likelihood that I was the only one is often high. For example, I often find myself being the only viewer of a video, or the only one posting on some website, out of 7+ billion people, I'm literally the only one on the counter, and I think you can extrapolate that to offline activities too.
>> No. 38093 [Edit]
File 16192829104.jpg - (2.11MB , 1700x1535 , 5036950f3d0c7bc9b9b46a6228e28372.jpg )
38093
I think a lot of, if not most people, try to form their tastes based on their ideals, while I'm the opposite. I formed my ideals based on my tastes. It seems like doing it my way is actually taboo.
>> No. 38106 [Edit]
File 161948102068.jpg - (1.46MB , 981x1280 , 1c92653a8495c600782f30e0ead168b9.jpg )
38106
If a human could be considered a deity, what do you think the minimum requirements should be?
If somebody: is physically fit enough perform a planche and can comfortably use a 50 lb kettle bell, can draw reasonably well(around kenkou cross's level), knows enough about computers and programming to be able to write an operating system from scratch, can understand most of what they read in two very different languages, and regularly studies new thing, I would consider them to be a human deity.

Is that completely stupid, or does my criteria have some weight? What would you consider a person who meets all of those requirements?

Post edited on 26th Apr 2021, 6:46pm
>> No. 38107 [Edit]
>>38106
Do you mean "deity" (or is there a definition to diety that I'm not aware of?).

Assuming the former, the criteria you mentioned actually aren't too strict – it's rare enough that I'd be quite impressed, but not so rare as to elevate one to deity level. That is, the criteria you mentioned are something that a reasonably talented and motivated person could attain with some level of work.

To me, deity would imply someone whose capabilities are basically out of reach for everyone; a once in a century kind of anomaly. Some subset of the hungarian scientists termed The Martians [1] would probably qualify; I'd nominate von Neumann just because of the breadth of his contributions (the techniques in game theory and LP duality itself would have cemented him in history, let alone the other fields of math he worked on).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Martians_(scientists)
>> No. 38108 [Edit]
File 161949137183.jpg - (191.80KB , 694x840 , 5f046a99417b093df5b31f777ca609ee.jpg )
38108
>>38107
>To me, deity would imply someone whose capabilities are basically out of reach for everyone
Being exceptionally well-rounded seems more awe worthy to me. I guess a deity to me is somebody who's impressive enough overall to the point of questioning their humanity and wanting to follow them. Being really good in one area is definitely impressive, but not in the same way.

Post edited on 26th Apr 2021, 7:45pm
>> No. 38202 [Edit]
File 162033728911.jpg - (1.57MB , 1448x2048 , 759e4c3047dae4e5ccf3fa66827051f2.jpg )
38202
People like Chris McCandless kind of fascinate me. If you don't know who that is, look him up. Voluntary hermits seem to have some qualities in common with the people here. They feel disconnected from society and jaded enough to actually exit it and try living outside of it. Have you ever considered doing that? What do you think of voluntary hermits? Are they stupid and risking their life without good reason, or are they impressive in the lengths they go to get away from other people and social obligations?
>> No. 38203 [Edit]
File 162036754182.jpg - (788.76KB , 1700x802 , 1580611029477.jpg )
38203
>>38202
McCandless seemed to me like a city kid that didn't know what he was doing and ended dead as a result.
Living isolated in a cabin in the woods while being prepared and having a town or stores relatively close is another thing. Ted Kaczynski lived like that for a long time and he barely needed a few dolars a year to survive, but he was really smart, prepared and trained. Living like that without the curse of working and human interaction is something I like to fantasize sometimes. But I lived my childhood like some sort of "involuntary" hermit and I can say it was extremely boring and I was envious of other kids. Living in a comfortable isolated place with electricity, internet and anything you need would be another thing, but you need to be rich for something like that. About cutting with the social obligations and stuff, isn't that what I already do? I work to get money, but besides that I pretty much live the same way.
>> No. 38204 [Edit]
File 162036866434.jpg - (958.76KB , 1150x750 , 46aa3b4a55f22887622bdbcf746a56f3.jpg )
38204
>>38203
What interested me about him was, from what I read, his potential to be a "successful person", which he willingly gave up in favor of seclusion. He wasn't a person who wouldn't fit into society even if he wanted to or had ideological reasons for his alienation like Ted. Ted Kaczynski seems like an asshole to me since he killed others for the sake of advertising his manifesto. He actively tried to get other people to follow his ideology too, so he didn't really disconnect from society emotionally.

McCandless was kind of an over-confident idiot, but he didn't die right away despite his lack of experience and willful ignorance, which is impressive in its own way.
>> No. 38208 [Edit]
File 162058978928.png - (84.46KB , 721x654 , 地獄少女05巻084.png )
38208
I wonder how much of humanity would be dragged to hell in a year if there really were a website like in jigoku shoujo. Right off the bat every single politician and public person would be done for.
>> No. 38209 [Edit]
>>38208
I think you overestimate people's wiliness to self sacrifice, even if for the greater good.
>> No. 38334 [Edit]
I have a ps2 that does not work. Lately I've been thinking of trying to get it fixed. Problem is, it has been sitting there for years full of dust, I don't know almost anything about fixing things, but I've been watching videos of restaurations. Also I feel like maybe I will turn it on and then try to relieve my childhood memories, but will notice things that suck about those games and ruin it. Not to mention the fact I may have to buy spare parts or a soldering iron that I never used and need to figure out a way to make it work on modern TV. If I remember well, the problem is that it does not turn on. But before that I experienced a series of problems with the audio, where the volume needed to be on very high settings so you could barely hear it.
The guilt and shame of trying to fix it and fucking it up even more, it doesn't look very great right now, almost like those restaurations videos of extremely damaged videogames, but a little better. Maybe some cleaning will help. Also I live close to the sea so I can't be sure the components are destroyed.
The price of spare parts and paying someone else to fix it is very discouraging.
>> No. 38335 [Edit]
File 162230775732.png - (1.17MB , 640x853 , 1585246085497.png )
38335
>>38334
>The guilt and shame of trying to fix it and fucking it up even more

I know that feeling well. I had like 6 or 7 controllers (Ps2 ones at a time they weren't that cheap) and someday I decided to clean them and try to get them work better. One hour later I had broken all of them. I also have a PSP that doesn't turn on and I haven't touched it for more than a year, I keep saying to myself someday I should try something with it but I'll probably never do it.

About the Ps2, it shouldn't be cheaper to just get one that works? They are really cheap and everywhere, best selling console in history after all. Also if you're afraid you could ruin your memories just don't use anything but a CRT TV. I played Ps2 for like 15 years, there was so many games and they looked good, but they were never meant, except for a few that could support it, for use in modern TV's.
>> No. 38336 [Edit]
>>38335
>About the Ps2, it shouldn't be cheaper to just get one that works?
That's a possibility. I can find some used ones being sold for cheap, it says in the description it works. The problem is I'm kinda paranoid about buying electronics or "prone to failure" objects online. It's a pain in the ass if it doesn't work as intended or comes with pieces lacking. I once bought a deluxe edition game online it came completely sealed, but somehow the actual game wasn't there. All the extra stuff, but the game was missing, a trouble to return and get my money back.
Also, if I buy it but become tired of it and never play again it again (which is probable) feels like a waste, as opposed to fixing it, somehow it gives the impression of less commitment.

>Also if you're afraid you could ruin your memories just don't use anything but a CRT TV
I don't have a CRT anymore. I head you could buy some cable and they looked fine on modern TV, but I didn't really investigated. It still looks off with the cable?
When I mentioned ruining my memories I was talking about playing the games I liked and seeing many faults and defects within them, and thinking "Was this my concept of a great time?", therefore ruining that time period. But if they look off it will ruin as well.
>> No. 38337 [Edit]
>>38336
Have you considered using emulators?
>> No. 38338 [Edit]
File 162231330758.jpg - (89.25KB , 1460x1500 , 71oNNxzIiFL__AC_SL1500_.jpg )
38338
>>38336
If you know any second hand shop they probably have ps2's for cheap, you can always return it if it doesn't work. Ps2's in it's prime were already prone to failure but it's good for you to know fat Ps2's were better than slims and models 3000x and 5000x were the most reliable among the fats, so a good fat that's still working to this day is probably going to keep working for some time. It shouldn't cost you more than 30$ or so anyway.
For a modern TV you need a component cable like pic related. As I see it, being the best available option doesn't mean it will look "nice" with it, just less bad, and there's also other problems like aspect ratio some games could suffer.
If CRT isn't an alternative then I would also consider emulation, at the end it's probably going to look beter.
What games you wanted to play anyway?
>> No. 38339 [Edit]
>>38334
It'd probably require resoldering something. I think emulators are the way to go here since it's probably less hassle than buying a new one. At least for wii & gamecube emulation, dolphin is a work of art and a gem of an open-source project.

Post edited on 29th May 2021, 3:32pm
>> No. 38359 [Edit]
I've been thinking. The term "restaurant" seems weird. Why would these places be called this I wondered. It sounds a lot "rest you want". Which makes me wonder if that's not the origin of the term, and that it didn't simply get distorted over time as things usually do. Because that's the sort of phrase I can see advertised for a restaurant.
>> No. 38360 [Edit]
>>38359
It is a loanword from French. It also shares the same origin with the verb "restore".
>Borrowed from French restaurant, present participle of the verb restaurer.
>> No. 38363 [Edit]
>>38360
Seems I was way off, thanks.
>> No. 38364 [Edit]
File 162260792880.png - (911.76KB , 866x645 , 9ebd05fc36b808959e86082d6c50bf9d.png )
38364
Do you prefer Udon or Ramen soup? From what I know, Udon has a lighter, transparent broth, which I kind of prefer to Ramen's heavy one.
>> No. 38365 [Edit]
File 162263317693.jpg - (487.00KB , 2220x1882 , __yakumo_yukari_and_yakumo_ran_touhou_drawn_by_kom.jpg )
38365
>>38364
I like both, though I've only come to enjoy Udon as I grow older. For Ramen, of the four base varieties my preference is Shio > Shoyu > Tonkotsu/Miso. Just like you, I generally prefer a lighter broth. I think in terms of broth the general difference is not just in the thickness of the broth but the base of it. Udon broths are generally made of only dashi whereas Ramen incorporates chicken/pork bone broth. Ramen might in most cases just edge it simply due to the sheer variety it comes in but if I really had to choose then I'd probably go with Udon at the moment.
>> No. 38367 [Edit]
If you sleep on your chest, does that mean you wake down?
>> No. 38381 [Edit]
What's the deal with this part of catbox.moe's terms of service?
>You may not use our website and Services to store, use, download, upload, share, access, transmit, or otherwise make available, data in violation of any law in any country
>any law in any country
I almost feel like making a steam account just to be a smart ass and ask the owner if North Korea counts.
>> No. 38382 [Edit]
>>38381
Standard cover-your-ass disclaimer. If you're operating a file-sharing site, better safe than sorry. Besides, given that anything can be trivially encrypted anyway those warnings are basically useless.
>> No. 38383 [Edit]
>>38367
It's always WAKE UP. You don't go lower to stand up to get out of bed, right?
>> No. 38387 [Edit]
These days you'll often be told that everything is political. The corollary is communities and services with which you interact must not only condone such topics but encourage them. However, I've been thinking: The truthfulness of this proposition is irrelevant; Convincing others of your political views is pointless--especially online--as people are not looking for their positions to be changed. Thus the result that occurs is a community or service swamped in tedious arguments, shitposts, and animus. No political change occurs; Nothing has been gained.
Tangentially, if you're an admin or moderator, never give those that believe in political innateness any ground because you'll never get it back.

P.S. I don't think my thought is all that controversial (or original), so I don't expect anything heated. But if that's wrong, then please move this to /tat/.
>> No. 38388 [Edit]
>>38387
>I don't think my thought is all that controversial (or original)
It's not.
>> No. 38399 [Edit]
>>38387
Things can be unpolitical. Until someone decides the neutrality doesn't benefit their cause and starts acting as if everything is politics, starts expanding into areas previously unclaimed. From that point on everything is indeed political. If you act like you're staying out of it it doesn't mean you're really outside of the fight. Politics and other people's lives have influence over you. You can be or pretend to be unaware of it but the powers struggling against one another don't care. An area uncontested is an area lost, a mind not allied is an enemy in the making. For every neutral there comes a time when some actor takes an action the neutral is no longer able to ignore, but by then it may be far too late to react. Everything is a battleground and if you're not winning you're losing. It's a zero sum game in which the passive participants are getting their asses kicked every day by default. Things won't calm down and be like they used to, this cat is never going back in the bag.
>> No. 38400 [Edit]
>>38399
>Things won't calm down and be like they used to, this cat is never going back in the bag.
People were saying this kind of crap to themselves for hundreds of years, and they'll be doing that for hundreds more. Current predicaments really don't warrant going out of your way to obsess over.
>> No. 38401 [Edit]
File 162391022250.jpg - (382.69KB , 1000x1081 , 3390918_p0.jpg )
38401
>>38400
I'm glad there are still people on the internet who can take it easy.
>> No. 38402 [Edit]
I know vtubers are just annoying fad, but I feel like it is more annoying than most dumb trends that come before it...
>> No. 38403 [Edit]
>>38402
Sadly I don't think it's just a fad... Streaming and Youtubing in general has been huge for a while and this is just a natural spin-off from that. I only hope that it stays in it's own domain and does not spread to much into Otaku culture.
>> No. 38404 [Edit]
>>38403
Eh, VTubers - in the Hololive sense, which is the most popular - are just another offshoot of idol culture. The pursuit of, say, picking well-known anime voice actresses has been a thing for ages now; this isn't anything new. I think these factors alone signify they are part of otaku culture and probably here to stay for a while.
>> No. 38480 [Edit]
One thing that bothers me is the way we use the leap days. Every normal year moves 1 day but leap years move 2, so the determination of a day by it's date is unnecessarily complicated. If we just make it so that the leap day was the same day as the day before everything would be great. Naming the day by a date would be very easy, and help a lot.
>> No. 38482 [Edit]
>>38480
Like a 48 hour day?
>> No. 38483 [Edit]
>>38482
Yes, if the leap day was Monday the following day would also be Monday. If is Sunday, then it's double Sunday.
>> No. 38484 [Edit]
The schooling system doesn't really train you to think, it trains you to take tests. Just look at how people struggle with questions that are open ended, a word problem, or god forbid, having to write a paper on a subject. It's far more difficult because you have to show you have a real understanding of the material rather than just good test taking skills. I realize for practical reasons that's kind of the best we can do. Requiring paper after paper to be written would take a lot of effort on the part of teachers. It'd get expensive fast.

I wonder what effect standardized testing has had on interpersonal relations. It makes education available to a lot more people but it effectively crams people full of "facts" and "truths" which are often a lot more nuanced than simply a "correct" answer(s). Putting people through that from youth has to have some sort of effect on society. The other day I was on the crypto reddit and some woman made a post about how DCA had worked out better for her than her husband's strategy of lump sum investing (she used it as a comparison) who initially teased her strategy. Leddit being the shithole it is completely ignored the rest of the post and grilled her for her "toxic relationship" even though they had no clue about the nature of the teasing or what their relationship was like. Some dude wrote three paragraphs about how she needs to leave him in response to a fucking sentence. Teasing and competition is sometimes a sign of a toxic relationship. This will be on the test. Program a monkey with those sort of thoughts and watch it lose it's shit because it's so sure it has all the facts thanks to getting an A on the test when that isn't indicative of actually understanding the situation. Another time some old lady asked me if I had a 3DPD and I responded "Nope". Nothing else, just nope. Her face soured and she started screaming about how "We don't want your fucking money! My daughter makes more money than her husband!". I had never discussed relationships or finances with her. Some men don't date because they get paranoid about gold diggers. I don't date so therefore I must be one of those men. It's most noticeable in the context of relationships but you can see the same thing in politics.

Have any of you had similar thoughts? I'd be interested to see if anyone's laid out the sort of thought process standardized testing might create. I'm vaguely familiar with critiques of scientism but I'm not sure how similar how that'd be. There's certainly something about objectification to it too. I wouldn't go quite so far as to say you should approach every situation as if it's brand new but rather a question of probabilities. I began delving into existentialism recently, these sort of questions have been on my mind.
>> No. 38485 [Edit]
>>38484
I'm not sure that I would agree with the premise considering that school tests are often more broad than what you give them credit for(at least here they are). Yes in some subjects they are quite simplistic such as in maths and Science but that is the nature of the subject. But for subjects like History, Business and sometimes even in sciences you do need to write papers, in fact often these papers are quite comparable to what you would write in early University and in my country they call year 12 a filtering year because they make students write far more of these papers than they would have before to prepare them for University. But if students were dropping out before year 10 or 11 then they may have not been exposed to this or if they do idiot subjects in year 11 and 12, but then due to the nature of the internet all of these people will be given a voice too I suppose(and they may have the loudest voices).
>> No. 38486 [Edit]
File 162524651779.jpg - (829.59KB , 1787x1969 , book.jpg )
38486
Plastic book covers are underutilized. Plastic has a somewhat bad reputation, but when you think about it, it's the perfect material for book covers. It's flexible, it's durable, it offers protection, and it's cheap.

I bought the dictionary of Japanese grammar series, and while they're very nice and helpful, their make is pretty flimsy. The covers are just a two pieces of thin paper partially stuck together, one of which is laminated. On top of that is a very thin, plastic book jacket. A fully plastic cover would be perfect here
>> No. 38487 [Edit]
I was just thinking about how I'd theoretically decorate my house during holidays like Christmas or Halloween. Seems like it'd be pretty fun and I'd like to do something creative while doing so. Then I got to thinking about other holidays and it made me wonder. How much trouble would I get in if I say, oh I dunno, made my house look like it was on fire for April 1st?
>> No. 38488 [Edit]
>>38487
I don't think you can get in trouble for other people's reactions unless that reaction is the cause of a life or death situation, like causing a driver to crash or a heavy machine operator to injure someone. So long as you're not part of a HOA, I think it would be fine. At worst you get a stern talking to by a first responder, but not hauled off to jail or anything like that.
>> No. 38508 [Edit]
File 16256512168.jpg - (276.96KB , 1920x1080 , cap_[Moozzi2] Puchimas!! PETIT IDOLM@STER - 01 (BD.jpg )
38508
>>38402
I think it's the live chat aspect. Idol fans were horrible but we always stayed in our little hives, being able to directly interact like that instantly makes it seem more annoying than it is.
>> No. 38525 [Edit]
File 162596402999.png - (1.10MB , 1066x800 , 29d3a05ae479aeb0e635573cc1a09035.png )
38525
I wonder sometimes what someone would think if they could see my pictures folder. If they were totally ignorant, they might assume I'm completely obsessed with women in a general sense. Why else would someone have thousands of pictures of scantily clad women? About 95% of them are drawn, but an ignorant person might not make that distinction. In a way, I am obsessed with women, but I don't usually think of it that way. Most of the time, I think I don't like women for the most part, and yet I spend much of my time looking at and listening to them.

On a larger scale, at face value, it's kind of odd how otaku interests are so often fixated on the female form. Things that have nothing to do with cute girls constantly have cute girls injected into them some way or another. When you take a step back, it is kind of bizarre.

Post edited on 10th Jul 2021, 10:57pm
>> No. 38526 [Edit]
File 162600739874.gif - (1.66MB , 480x270 , UXAL8249.gif )
38526
>>38525
>On a larger scale, at face value, it's kind of odd how otaku interests are so often fixated on the female form. Things that have nothing to do with cute girls constantly have cute girls injected into them some way or another. When you take a step back, it is kind of bizarre.

Most "otaku" into that stuff want nothing more than a relationship or are addicted to sex. Appealing to base instincts sells.
>> No. 38527 [Edit]
>>38525
Girls are more appealing so it makes sense, even if something has nothing to do with girls using them instead of boys just makes the characters look better. There is no reason not to have them be girls.
>> No. 38528 [Edit]
File 162602031910.jpg - (536.11KB , 900x1232 , c4a4eadcb80f398228c10342f50494c9.jpg )
38528
>>38527
>instead of boys just makes the characters
Yeah, but characters are also made out of thin air by anthropomorphism like the OS-tans, or white blood cells from Cells at Work. I understand why people do these things. I'm only pointing out the absurdity of it. I feel some disconnect from the "human experience" most people are entrenched in so much they don't even realize there's anything outside of it.

Post edited on 11th Jul 2021, 9:21am
>> No. 38529 [Edit]
>>38526
It's not just a sexual instinct, it's easier to portray them as more gentle. You can do that with the male form as well I guess, but then it starts to become more androgynous. There's also a reason why cgdct/sol are a natural pairing, and it's not just because they like to add in sexual undertones. There are SoL with mostly male characters as well, but they don't usually have the same tone in terms of depicting friendships.
>> No. 38537 [Edit]
File 162609514818.jpg - (932.12KB , 800x1798 , 1595836441091.jpg )
38537
>>38525
The same thoughts have occurred to me. If you count up the number of female main characters in the anime I watch and manga I read, they'll outnumber the men by 10x. Not at all the case in the non-otaku fiction I'm into. That's just how it turned out, and I have no strong opinions on how it should have otherwise gone.
>> No. 38538 [Edit]
>>38529
Anime has taught me self-hate, for masculinity kind of sucks.
>> No. 38539 [Edit]
File 162611265593.jpg - (285.26KB , 800x566 , be178bbd5fcb0c855cdd8bbb96050436.jpg )
38539
If you had 5 billion dollars, how would you spend it? People with that much money are boring as hell and don't do much of anything interesting, but they probably have to be in order to make that much. If I had that money though...

Think about how expensive the stuff you like is, and then think about 5 billion dollars. A 12 episode season of anime costs somewhere around 2 million, so you could make 2500 seasons, about 20 years worth. If there's any kind of tool or program or game you've wanted but doesn't exist, you could easily fund it.

4 people have over 100 billion dollars. If there's about 30 anime per season, that's 120 anime per year. Those people could fund 416 years worth of anime and still be left over with at least 20 billion dollars.

It's insane. Yet how many cool things like that have come from billionaires just out of their own personal interest? Not as a company or investment, just a hobby-centric spending of money that others could benefit from. Practically none. Elon Musk pretends to like anime. Does he really not have enough money to spare to help the production of one? Just one.

Post edited on 12th Jul 2021, 11:15am
>> No. 38540 [Edit]
>>38539
Spending it on things like art (shows, manga, LN, etc.) seems like the best way to leave a lasting impact. It's something that everyone will benefit from, and seems more directly impactful than the cliché of sending money to help starving 3rd world kids since you can physically manage the money allocation.

Speaking of which, I have a strong suspicion that the Sora no Method OVA was sponsored by some rich guy. I just can't see any other reason why they'd release a full-length ova for a very niche show that never sold well in the first place, and that too completely free on youtube.
>> No. 38596 [Edit]
>>38539
I've thought about this before. Why don't obscenely rich people fund video games, movies, anime that they personally want to watch?

I think at the end of the day, most extremely rich people are psychopaths or something like that. So they just want to amass more wealth and live in luxury.
If I had billions of dollars, I'd buy Kingdom Hearts from Disney, cut all of the Disney out, and let Tetsuya Nomura have an absolute field day with it.
I'd also probably just live by myself somewhere and get food delivered when I was hungry.
>> No. 38597 [Edit]
>>38596
That's what a child with money would do. And rich people didn't turn rich by thinking like a cbild.
Still, between the artists, people that made their fortune by having a particular talent independent of the rest of their personality, it could happen. Like if Michael Jackson would have liked anime I'm sure he would have funded something, but he liked to touch children instead, and that's respectable too. Anime is niche anyway. In the past movies have already been funded by rich people, mostly artists. Why they don't fund videogames? Because they are fucking expensive, if you want something huge as your millionaire ego, with triple AAA values, you're gonna need to throw like 100 million. And if you can throw that kind of money like nothing, why do you even need a videogame in the first place?
>> No. 38598 [Edit]
>>38597
>why do you even need a videogame in the first place
Because they're fun. Not everybody is solely interested in their hobbies as compensation.
>> No. 38599 [Edit]
>>38598
If videogames can be means of experiencing things you couldn't experience otherwise, having a ridiculous amount of money means you can experience most of it directly.
Not saying that's what videogames are all about, but you can see the logic there.
>> No. 38600 [Edit]
>>38599
You can't experience final fantasy or chrono trigger or even Mass Effect in real life. The majority of it is actually off the table. Most people also have zero interest in larping.

Post edited on 9th Aug 2021, 12:59pm
>> No. 38678 [Edit]
File 163119701285.jpg - (354.71KB , 480x697 , 761e90f4578e065700bcc586c5750b68.jpg )
38678
I like stories about lone heroes exterminating things. Vampire hunters are the most obvious example. I think "vampire hunting" is a whole genre, or at least a trope. There's just something about a guy wearing funny clothes running around wiping out "evil" that appeals to me.

Too often though this trope is subverted by making the evil things sympathetic and the hero reconsider their ideals. It's like that's more common than the straight forward version. An unwavering hero would be more of a subversion at this point.
>> No. 38679 [Edit]
If you take a laxative and do your business just before you die, would you still soil yourself after death?
>> No. 38690 [Edit]
File 163154223857.png - (577.25KB , 863x1200 , a63fcc14d3593934d365cd6026ffa842.png )
38690
Why is bitch used to describe belligerent women? As far as I know, female dogs aren't particularly aggressive or mean. Using bitch to describe a women originally implied that women was promiscuous, but promiscuity doesn't imply aggression or domineering behavior in women. So where did this connection come from?

Japanese people seem to still use bitch to refer to promiscuous women instead of uptight, cold, aggressive, etc. ones.
>> No. 38691 [Edit]
>>38690
It likely went something like this:
>Aggressive woman angers man back in the day when promiscuity was badly thought of
>Man wants to say something that'll hurt her the most and therefore implies promiscuity
Repeat ten thousand times and you've got a word in common usage.
>> No. 38721 [Edit]
File 163241083032.jpg - (70.68KB , 563x809 , 7025023c008dd7e1eedc5cbd2d9b45a7.jpg )
38721
People vastly underestimate how important encouragement is in systems. Really any kind of system. If you point out a problem with some way of doing things, somebody will always counter by saying "but it is possible to do x in the system, so that's not a valid criticism. It's the users/members fault for not doing x". Or worse, "x isn't worth doing".

It's always bullshit. It's reasonable to expect people to do what the system encourages/makes the easiest to do. It's unreasonable to expect people to do something the system doesn't encourage/makes difficult.

Technology is one of the most obvious examples of this. You could point out every problem with a programming language, but there's always going to be somebody who develops in that language arguing against those issues by pointing out that technically, you can write code that avoids them.

“A poor workman blames his tools.”. If everybody thought like that, people would still be programming in binary. Tools/systems are meant to help you make/do something. You can measure the quality of a tool/system by how much it helps you make/do something you want well. This idea applies to education and infrastructure too. It seems obvious to me, but I get the feeling I'm in the minority. Your character is measured by how well you tolerate mediocrity.
>> No. 38724 [Edit]
Imagine how shitty it would be to be Japanese, but born in America. You could have been living in your homeland where your ancestors were for thousands of years and the vast majority of people are like you, but instead you had to grow up in the opposite of that. Borderline child abuse I think.
>> No. 38725 [Edit]
>>38724
You aren't really japanese if you're born in America. Japanese immigrants used to integrate quite fast in other countries so a second generation would barely keep anything from the culture of their parents, including something as basic as the language. That's why it was fucked up for them when they were interned in WW2, they were people who felt 100% american and suddenly their country treated them like foreigners and spies.
But the ones that have it very hard are the nikkei, descendants of japanese immigrants from Brazil, Peru and others who return to Japan and can't integrate for shit, so it shows how the culture is mostly lost after one generation. It's interesting to think there was a time not that long ago when the japanese immigrated massively to south america, my mother used to see many of them in the 40's and 50's in Argentina.
>> No. 38726 [Edit]
>who return to Japan and can't integrate for shit

I personally know so many people who blows this assumption to smithereens it's even funny.
>> No. 38727 [Edit]
>>38725
Seems to me looking the part is more than half the battle for those who want to move back.
>> No. 38728 [Edit]
>>38726
How many of those have only convinced themselves they've integrated but are in fact too dense to realize (or care) otherwise?
>> No. 38729 [Edit]
>>38724
>Imagine how shitty it would be to be [Ethnicity], but born in America. You could have been living in your homeland where your ancestors were for thousands of years and the vast majority of people are like you, but instead you had to grow up in the opposite of that. Borderline child abuse I think.
Excluding Africans and maybe Chinese, every single group who emigrated to the Americas would be better off living in their homelands.
>>38725
>Japanese immigrants used to integrate quite fast
>But the ones that have it very hard are the nikkei, descendants of japanese immigrants from Brazil, Peru and others who return to Japan and can't integrate for shit, so it shows how the culture is mostly lost after one generation. It's interesting to think there was a time not that long ago when the japanese immigrated massively to south america, my mother used to see many of them in the 40's and 50's in Argentina.
I don't know nor do I have much personal experience dealing with nikkei around here, where I live it's very rare to see Asian people at all, I think I only saw around 4 japanese blooded humans in my life,. The nikkei are all concentrated in the State of SP, and nearby regions, as you distance yourself from there their numbers dwindle. I also don't think that there's anything actually japanese about these people. But from what I heard the Japanese initally did not integrate at all. They read newspapers in japanese only and did not speak portuguese. They mostly lived in a neighboorhood called "Liberdade"(means freedom in portuguese). This place is stylized after the japanese streets so it's like "Japantown". Brazil is actually the place with the highest amount of japanese people living in it outside Japan. I remember going to that place as a kid to buy manga and them returning to the same store years later and the manga stand was EXACTLY like I saw last time, there were the EXACT same volumes I saw.
There was actually a "terrorist" group of japanese brazilians, called Shindou Renmei(臣道連盟) who targeted "soft" japanese who spread the news of Japans defeat after the war. They killed 23 people and wounded a few hundred. I've heard from people who lived in the Liberdade area that even until a few decades ago, there were many japanese who did not speak portuguese and kept it to themselves. Of course most immigrants were like that. The germans as well. Nothing out of the ordinary here.
Regardless of all that, I must agree with your points, I don't see how these people could be integrated back nor do I think they will ever be fully integrated here. Forever unwelcome.
>> No. 38730 [Edit]
>>38728
They all married locals, have stable jobs, fishing buddies and all that happy shit. At least one is actually really well off financially (judging by the fact he owns something as useless as a fishing boat). Most are in Kumamoto and have lived there for over 20 years.
>> No. 38731 [Edit]
>>38730
I don't think I'd consider being well off financially as sign of being well integrated in the culture/society, or even having a stable job. You can have those and even a local partner that likes exotic fruits and still stand out like a sore thumb while dealing with casual discrimination. But hey, good on them if they're happy and making it work.
>> No. 38736 [Edit]
>>38731
You wouldn't but Japan certainly does consider those things to be enough. They are granted Japanese citizenship after all.
>> No. 38746 [Edit]
File 163320985438.jpg - (854.69KB , 1500x1263 , 85514208_p17.jpg )
38746
Isn't it weird that feeling bad for "bad people" is also considered bad? The rationale is that people must sympathize with those like themself, but we're constantly told that sympathizing with people you have nothing in common with is a virtue, so that's a contradictory assumption to make.

The other rationale is that sympathy is somehow a reward, even for dead people, or a finite resource. If you give sympathy to x person, you must be giving less to y person who deserves it more(never mind neither x nor y benefits). It's bizarre.
>> No. 38781 [Edit]
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alala
>Alala /ˈælələ/ (Ancient Greek: Ἀλαλά (alalá); "battle-cry" or "war-cry") was the personification of the war cry in Greek mythology. Her name derives from the onomatopoeic Greek word ἀλαλή (alalḗ),[1] hence the verb ἀλαλάζω (alalázō), "to raise the war-cry". Greek soldiers attacked the enemy with this cry in order to cause panic in their lines. Hesiod asserted that Athenians adopted it to emulate the cry of the owl, the bird of their patron goddess Athena.[2]
>Hesiod asserted that Athenians adopted it to emulate the cry of the owl, the bird of their patron goddess Athena.[2]
I checked the [2] reference and there's nothing saying anything about alala. I've read the book and I don't think there was anything about this either. Nonetheless this seems to appear in other languages articles besides the english, with no better references. I think this was a mistake.
>> No. 38794 [Edit]
File 163448360339.jpg - (555.26KB , 1600x1070 , 1603578831268.jpg )
38794
>>38781
So, I made an wikipedia account to edit this, displaying a message that such claims could not be found in the source. Surprisingly, an answer came right away. Someone else edited the reference to point to another book, that had the claim. But the thing is the book has a reference on the part it claims such thing, and that reference points back to Hesiod, but has no specific source. This book was written in 2021. Looks like I've been going in circles.
>> No. 38795 [Edit]
>>38794
Don't bother with wikipedia editing. Wikipedia moderators are notoriously pedantic, hypocritical, biased, power-hungry assholes.
>> No. 38798 [Edit]
>>38794
>>38795
I'll second that, absolutely don't bother with wikipedia. I too have tried to change sources that were plain wrong in the past, it's not worth it. Look at the discussion and edit history pages for a few articles, it's like a circus managed by biased and authoritarian monkeys.
>> No. 38813 [Edit]
>>38730
Money is only a measure of integration into the capitalist system, and the main goal of capitalism is obliteration of all national identities. Holding any strong beliefs that aren't derived from jobs, career, money, wealth and possessions is bad for global business, you see.

>>/r/15
>> No. 38816 [Edit]
File 163484994345.png - (19.66KB , 478x120 , logo-white-478x120.png )
38816
I don't see anybody mentioning this anywhere but I'm convinced that sankaku channel news comment section is genuinely the worst place on the internet and every single person, without any exception, that post on it is clinically insane.
>> No. 38817 [Edit]
>>38816
Its kind of insane that Sankaku still is active, no wonder it only has insane users left
>> No. 38818 [Edit]
>>38816
Sankaku channel has some fanbox stuff.
>> No. 38819 [Edit]
>>38817
I don't know who uses it for news, but given that gelbooru and danbooru are often mirrored to sankaku via bots, sankaku usually ends up having the widest selection of content. The downside is that there's more garbage in there as well.
>> No. 38820 [Edit]
File 163491113480.jpg - (4.72MB , 2508x3541 , throw gift.jpg )
38820
I was creating an account in one of those sites that have very informative password helpers, saying information on how exactly secure your password was. I tried creating passwords with Hitler and Stalin on it, they all resulted "This is too similar to a very common password". Trying Lenin was more successful, he had average results. Mussolini did better. Chairman Mao and Trosky were very strong according to the information. So was Emperor Shouwa.
>> No. 38830 [Edit]
>>38819
Filtered gelbooru has the most amount of stuff while maintaining the quality, the site used to almost be perfect until they relaxed their rules on game screenshots. Still, with filters it compliments pixiv pretty well.
Sankaku in my experience has the most westshit of the major boorus.
>> No. 38831 [Edit]
If you put an electric motor on a bicycle, shouldn't that make it a motorcycle??
>> No. 38832 [Edit]
>>38831
I think electric bikes differ from electric motorbikes in that the former might have restrictions on horsepower and weight, while the latter doesn't.
>> No. 38833 [Edit]
>>38831
There's still pedals a person can use to move the bike "manually". The motor on electric bikes is mostly to help with steep hills traditionally(gas based motors). Now, pedaling can actually charge the battery on some electric bikes.

Electric bikes are for people who want the same use case as a bike, but more advanced. Motorbikes are strictly a car alternative.
>> No. 38839 [Edit]
File 163519034456.jpg - (27.15KB , 236x700 , 1603731536754.jpg )
38839
I tried to come up with a "Buffalo buffalo buffalo" or similar kind of sentence. Here's my attempt:
"Will Will ever will to will a will?"
Is it grammatically correct? The "will x ever will" sounds very pleonastic, but is it incorrect? Google show some uses of this expression.
If that's correct then we can have:
"Will Will ever will to will Will to will Will to will a will that Will will will Will to will Will to will that Will will will Will to will a will." This could on for longer.
If not, then at least:
"Will Will will Will to will Will to will a will that Will will Will to will Will to will that Will will will Will to will a will." This could go on forever.
>> No. 38840 [Edit]
>>38839
I read that there's a neat corollary to the buffalo thing where no matter how many buffalos you add it remains a semantically valid senence.
>> No. 38843 [Edit]
File 163525636763.jpg - (65.30KB , 640x480 , 1608997167692.jpg )
38843
>>38840
There seems to be a record of a similar sentence.
>Will, will Will will Will Will's will? – Will (a person), will (future tense helping verb) Will (a second person) will (bequeath) [to] Will (a third person) Will's (the second person) will (a document)? (Someone asked Will 1 directly if Will 2 plans to bequeath his own will, the document, to Will.
Also as long you keep "Buffalo buffalo", you can repeat that N times them add a "buffalo" and then a "Buffalo buffalo", and the sentence will have the same meaning of the first one, only extended to N Buffalo buffaloes.
However it is also important to note that:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_buffalo_Buffalo_buffalo
>Thomas Tymoczko has pointed out that there is nothing special about eight "buffalos"; any sentence consisting solely of the word "buffalo" repeated any number of times is grammatically correct.
Really interesting.
>> No. 38844 [Edit]
File 163527538169.jpg - (135.90KB , 799x705 , buffalo buffalo buffalo.jpg )
38844
>>38843
This is actually really fun. I came up with another such sentence:
"Can candid Candid can candid Candid?"
This is very repeating and has a hypnotic sense to it, but it could be expanded further at the expense of it's dreamy repetition.
"Can candid Candid candidly can candid Candid?"
Both of these sentences could also be expanded into infinity, as follows:
"Can candid Candid can candid Candid, can candid Candid and can candid Candid?"
"Can candid Candid candidly can candid Candid, candidly can candid Candid and candidly can candid Candid?"
The previous sentences mainly use "can" as a verb for all except the first use, but they could become more byzantine. Here's an example:
"Candid can can candid Candid, can can candid Candid, can Candid, candidly can Candid, can Candid."
And another:
"Candid Candid can can candid Candid, can Candid, candidly can candid Candid. Can Candid?"
Then, we can step up the rhythm.
"Candid Candid can candidly can candid cancan Candid, cancan can candidly can candid cancan Candid."
"Can can can candid Candid, can can can candid cancan Candid, can can can cancan."
"Can can can candid Candid, can candid Candid can can?"
"Cancan Candid can can candid Candid, can can can can?"
"Can can can can, can can can can?"
"Can can can cancan, cancan can candidly can candid cancan Candid."
"Can did can candid Candid, candid Candid did can cancan Candid."
Now I should add that there's another sentence here just like "Buffalo buffalo buffalo". It's the "Can can can can." Just like the "buffalo" sentence, the "can" sentence uses only one word and can be repeated indefinitely. Also the word "can" can appear any number of times, and the sentence still works.
"Can" is a noun phrase.
"Can can" indicates that a can is able to do something.
"Can can can" indicates that a can is able to do the act of canning, or alternatively to put a stop to something.
"Can can can can" indicates that a can is able to do the act of canning upon another can, or just put a stop to another can. Hence, we can add commas as we see fit.
>> No. 38845 [Edit]
>>38844
I wonder if there's a japanese equivalent where you just write a single kana again and again and it parses as something valid. I know there's the sumomo tongue twister, but is there one that's like the buffalo thing?
>> No. 38846 [Edit]
File 163528617733.jpg - (245.93KB , 1089x1500 , 1592753299540.jpg )
38846
>the sumomo tongue twister
Oh, I did not know about the twister, I knew there was the famous manga, but the origin of the name was unknown to me so far.
>but is there one that's like the buffalo thing?
Yes, there is one that dates back a few centuries. In japanese it's 子子子子子子子子子子子子, which translates to neko no ko koneko, shishi no ko kojishi.
You can read more here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ono_no_Takamura#Takamura_in_later_literature
>> No. 38847 [Edit]
>>38846
That's awesome, should have expected something like that in the literature. Where does the "の" come from though, since I don't see that as a valid reading for "子" (then again, my knowledge of JP is limited enough that I didn't realize "ne" was a valid KN reading either).

Amusingly (or expectedly) mecab handles "sumomo mo momo..." pretty well but falls flat on 子x12.
>> No. 38850 [Edit]
>>38847
>Where does the "の" come from though, since I don't see that as a valid reading for "子"
They're omitted from the text but still implied. I have seen this happening especially with historical Japanese names. In fact, if you look at the author's name closely, you see it's written as 小野篁(おのたかむら) but pronounced as おの の たかむら.
>> No. 38851 [Edit]
>>38850
Got it, that makes sense. I wish the translation had used the convention of putting implied text in brackets. I also found this note for particle conventions for old japanese [1]

>The idea that everything has a particle in theory, which is either "dropped" or not, is actually relatively modern. In earlier forms of Japanese, there were many cases where "no particle" was most correct, particularly marking subjects and direct objects: 花咲く都, 兎追いし彼の山, etc. Thus: (1) The modern "use ALL the particles" written style is not the Ideal form from which particles are dropped, but an artificially hypercorrected form; (2) Writing quoting or emulating older forms of Japanese may, grammatically, omit particles that would otherwise be expected.

Although as some of the other comments there note, even in modern japanese dropping の would serve to make it a compound-noun. And I guess "neko ko" also makes sense in that light (with some poetic license for the non-standard compound).


[1] https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/3151/what-are-the-guidelines-of-omitting-particles
>> No. 38857 [Edit]
The Latin word "patria", meaning fatherland, is somewhat ingenious. It suggests the duty of obedience towards the fatherly authority's will; the grammatical gender connotates the female object of this will, the passive principle of the earth which is the fruitful source of life itself; it also sounds a bit like "per terram".
>> No. 38893 [Edit]
File 163621166366.jpg - (83.06KB , 724x1024 , b2f48eaa428aa514c5aed0719f3faee7.jpg )
38893
I dont know if this too /tat/y, but I deeply admire Germany (mostly non politically, they tend to fall into extremes, that's all I'll say about that) but the more I interact with German culture such as film and literature there is something not quite right and makes me feel uneasy. I really dont know why.
>> No. 38919 [Edit]
I wonder how big of an influence India is to whatever gets popular online. When usernames are available it sure seems like they are the vast majority.
>> No. 38924 [Edit]
File 163654422761.jpg - (500.83KB , 1400x787 , 90c248c1c3f00a796eeff28d64847673.jpg )
38924
I wrote out a long doompost about how I think 2D is the least healthy it has ever been since the bubble economy popped, but it basically boiled down to idols, mobage, vtubers and the like abusing the medium to sell their CDs or retarded gambling but you could argue anime is mostly just a commercial for the manga it is adapted from, so I don't know what to say about it really.
>> No. 38925 [Edit]
>>38924
Very little artistic endeavour is free of commercial intent. It's mostly a bunch of studios with overworked staff trying to sell you something. If that fact makes you feel like the art they produce is tainted or an "abuse", then you're certainly in for an awful time. It's all a matter of how much you want to accept or ignore that fact.

The way I see it, commercial intent doesn't taint art. I don't think it less of Michelangelo's David just because it was a commission for the pope. It's still a masterpiece of Renaissance art. The same goes for the stuff you don't like. There's no "abusing a medium" the way I see it. You're trying to create something that will sell and that's the truth for mostly anyone trying to live off their trade, from manga artists to game designers and vtubers.
>> No. 38928 [Edit]
File 163657081442.jpg - (446.66KB , 1200x852 , c7712db2e40d600e9a102aa8ea9e561c0d773836.jpg )
38928
>>38925
I have come to realize that it is what it is, and as an anime fan its hypocritical to complain about such things because many consider adaptations inherent advertisement. Even worse if its something like mecha where people consider it a blatant toy commercial, when I was deeply into that genre I used to intensely dislike that label and considered it dismissive. I similarly am not being fair to things like idols and vtubers, honestly.

You also have to admit there are levels to this, Chinese gacha is worse than most things in the greed and commerciality of it, and people handwave it off because "cute girls" or "good designs", I realize I sound like that "I have to assume everyone saying it's the new Touhou replacement is joking." guy so I'll stop now.

Thank you for the self-reflection opportunity.
>> No. 38929 [Edit]
>>38928
The way I see it, there _are_ many shows which are just formulaic cash-grabs (e.g. KF2), but there are also some where you can immediately tell that it's a passion project with a lot of care put into it (e.g. KF). While it's true that the former is usually pushed forward by commercial interests, the latter isn't always.
>> No. 38930 [Edit]
>>38928
>"good designs"
And funnily enough, most of them don't have good designs.
>> No. 38999 [Edit]
Sometimes I worry I'll die in the same place I started, and the world wont ever change. So because of that and boredom, I hope bad things will happen and things will change. It's a selfish way of thinking, but that doesn't matter.
>> No. 39000 [Edit]
>>38999
So why not move?
>> No. 39001 [Edit]
>>39000
I don't mean the same physical location.
>> No. 39014 [Edit]
I was wondering about the VRket. I remember some posts being made here about VR comiket lookalikes, but I can't find them anymore. Anyone knows if considering the current situation of comiket there will such a VRket this winter?
>> No. 39015 [Edit]
File 163950925012.png - (2.77MB , 1920x1080 , Summer Vket.png )
39015
>>39014
https://winter2021.vket.com/
Comiket is scheduled to return at the end of the month but there is indeed a winter vket that has been ongoing until the 19th. Glad that you'd mentioned it since I've completely forgotten about it.

The vket discussion you are looking for is on this thread >>31969
>> No. 39027 [Edit]
File 164023793276.png - (2.38KB , 600x600 , 600px-Color_icon_brown_v2_svg.png )
39027
I just had an in depth conversation with someone on color that revealed to me that I dont use the word "brown" the same way everyone else does. I always considered brown to be the range of color between that of chocolate and tan or sandy colors, but apparently most people only refer to the darker color with the term "brown"
>> No. 39028 [Edit]
>>39027
I call really light brown beige.
>> No. 39031 [Edit]
>>39028
They all have different names to me, of course, but I still consider them all to be shades or tints of brown. Apparently this is not a normal phenomenon.
>> No. 39111 [Edit]
Why do people pronounce Christmas as Chris-mas with a silent t? Why not call Jesus "Chris" while they're at it?
>> No. 39112 [Edit]
>>39111
Probably because it's easier to just treat the t as silent when slurring words together. Plus I don't think most people pronounce "Christ" in "Christmas" the same way they do it by itself ("kraist" vs "kristmas").
>> No. 39120 [Edit]
>>39112
Etymology seems to be "christ mass" (which I never noticed until now) and it's not too hard to see that if you say it quickly it sounds like "christmas"
>> No. 39227 [Edit]
File 164489632223.jpg - (67.01KB , 850x319 , 131178014562.jpg )
39227
God will allow billions of people to burn in hell forever because of mistakes made over a ~70 year lifetime. What kind of twisted perverted justice is that. He is also omniscient, so he knew from the start just how many billions of people he would doom to eternal suffering.
>> No. 39228 [Edit]
>>39227
"Hell" is only a thing under the judeo-christian framework. As far as I'm aware none of the eastern religions have an equivalent, although you're not completely out of the woods I suppose since some do have reincarnation.

I like this quote from Wikipedia
>The concept has been intensely debated in ancient literature of India; with different schools of Indian religions considering the relevance of rebirth as either essential, or secondary, or unnecessary fiction.[10] Hiriyanna (1949) suggests rebirth to be a necessary corollary of karma;[33] Yamunacharya (1966) asserts that karma is a fact, while reincarnation is a hypothesis;[34] and Creel (1986) suggests that karma is a basic concept, rebirth is a derivative concept.[35]

Also that image would make a nice banner for TC. Just need to resize it a bit and add "Tohno-chan" somewhere in there

Post edited on 14th Feb 2022, 8:09pm
>> No. 39229 [Edit]
>>39227
Yes, it's dumb and makes no sense. I'd rather ignore Christianity because I think the topic has long been exhausted.

Post edited on 14th Feb 2022, 9:02pm
>> No. 39230 [Edit]
>>39227
>because of mistakes made over a ~70 year lifetime
Actually no, you can make all mistakes you want or even be an asshole willingly, if you regreet your actions and believe in Jesus Christ, even if it's in the last second of your existence, you'll be saved. Which is unfair in it's own way. The japanese used to complain to missionaries about how all their previous generations would have been punished for not believing in the christian God while they could not have possibly known about him.
Also, since Origen of Alexandria and later with universalism there's also this idea that everyone will end in heaven at one time or another. Still, yeah, Hell has always been problematic, like many monotheistic ideas, and there has been many attempts to circumvent that; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_Hell
>> No. 39231 [Edit]
>>39227
If they are bad they are bad, it does not matter how long they have lived for. I don't have an issue with it. Even with billions of people, that was always going to happen because people are always going to reproduce, though maybe you could argue that he should have stopped it all by now and judgement day should have come or something(I'm not Christian and I never read that book so I don't know how that works or what his goal was in creating people in the first place).

>>39230
That's something I do have an issue with, sure, if somebody knows the moral rules and does not follow them then he is bad, but if somebody was never taught them then it cannot be there fault and in fact it could only be Gods fault. Because if he is an omnipotent being he could have made it so that they were taught it. But there are holes like this all over religion so I will not dwell on it.
>> No. 39232 [Edit]
>>39227
It's on the same level of telling kids santa will give them coal if they aren't nice, or how the boogie man will take away bad little children. Hell is how religion tries to scare dumb people into being good. Which of course doesn't work, because I think deep down no one really believes it exists, and if they're that delusional they've undoubtedly convinced themselves they're going to the other place in spite of how horrible of a person they are. Not that it's hard to get in. From what I've gathered you can be an absolute monster, scum of the earth, and still get a golden ticket as long as you have Jesus in your heart~

That's not to mention the really bizarre rules/sins that people conveniently forget about, like how cutting your beard or damaging your testicles can get you a ticket to hell. I think you're also expected to kill your wife if she cuts her hair short or gets tattoos or something like that.
>> No. 39233 [Edit]
>>39232
I agree on the tattoos bit.
>> No. 39235 [Edit]
>what his goal was in creating people in the first place
Christians don't know this either. If you ask, they'll ramble incoherently about glory and love.
>> No. 39236 [Edit]
>>39233
Oh don't get me wrong I think they're hideous and it's mildly depressing to see women ruin their bodies like that. The point is simply the disproportionate response along with the many other unreasonable and down right silly sins in the bible.
>> No. 39241 [Edit]
>>39232
>>39236
It's not actually silly at all. According to Christians, God made us as a reflection of himself, our body is God's body. So if you tattoo or mutilate your body, you are actually vandalising Gods body. Also what it actually says is 'You shall not make any cuts on your body for the dead or tattoo yourselves: I am the LORD' there is nothing about killing your wife there nor actually does it specify what the punishment should be.

Additionally, even if there are parts that do sound silly, you have to remember that this was written in a completely different time. What they wrote may sound silly but it probably was a reaction to something that was causing an issue somehow at the time, or even thought to be causing one.
>> No. 39242 [Edit]
>>39241
And yet circumcision is heavily practiced?
>> No. 39243 [Edit]
>>39242
That's fairly recent(and American I think). They actually used that as a call to arms during the Crusades, priest would fire people up by saying that Christian boys were being circumcised by Muslims in the Holy land.
>> No. 39301 [Edit]
File 164608836298.jpg - (117.59KB , 1080x640 , paul_on_circumcision.jpg )
39301
>>39242
The New Testament explicitly speaks out in multiple places against the circumcision of non-Jewish Christians, and Christians outside of North America (and Korea, who took the religion from their American overlords after WW2) generally do not practice circumcision.
There are at least 4 distinct influences that brought about the American practice of circumcision among Christians:
1. British Israelism (read up on it; to this day, the British royal family has all of its newborn males circumcised by Jewish mohels)
2. American cosmetics corporations make anti-aging creams out of stemcells from baby foreskins and pay hospitals shitloads of money for them, which is why many American hospitals are very aggressive in their promotion of circumcision to mothers (Oprah and Kate Beckinsale used to advertise for these)
3. The influence of sickos like Dr. Kellogg, who popularized cornflakes with the goal of lowering the sex drive of children by giving them bland food, and advocated circumcision for boys and the destruction of the clitoris with acid for girls with the goal of making it harder for them to masturbate.
4. The simple fact that there are a lot of Jews working in health-related professions in the US. As a coping mechanism, some secular Jews invent supposed medical reasons for circumcision in the same way they invent reasons for why kosher food is supposedly really healthy. "Mainstream" religious Jews tend to look down on this as they correctly point out that the evidence for those supposed health benefits tends to be flimsy at best; and insist that HaShem commanding His people to eat kosher and to get circumcised is reason enough to do it. But among some religious Jews, promoting circumcision to non-Jews and Christians in particular may also hold some religious significance. I can think of one or two instances of non-Jews undergoing circumcision in the Torah, the first one is when Abraham is commanded to circumcise his slaves (I do not know if there were non-Jews among the slaves) and the second one is in Genesis 34, where Sons of Jacob/Israel trick an entire citystate into having their men circumcised in order to genocide them while they were in pain and subsequently loot their possessions. So perhaps they see circumcising non-Jews as a mark of dominance (as over a slave) or as a kiss of death given to a people they revile, I can't say for sure because my Hebrew/Aramaic isn't good enough to read all the influential commentary on these issues.
>> No. 39313 [Edit]
File 164650996181.jpg - (183.97KB , 1200x1192 , 922c2be9e664df250c537f8e7c7c77cc.jpg )
39313
"Giving" your software a license, legitimizes a system that doesn't deserve respect. Those laws, as they are implemented now, exist for the sake of corporations, and corporations generally treats laws as business expenses.

Microsoft pirated QuickTime code, Trump's dumb twitter "alternative" possibly violates Mastodon's license, and Nintendo has used code from the same emulators they condemn. Why? Because they have enough money and power to brush off the repercussions.

For hobbyists or anybody producing software they don't intend to profit from, licenses are worthless decorations. If a company doesn't make their software foss, pirate it and or reverse compile it, and then do whatever you want.

Freetardism is obsolete in my opinion. Useful at first, and up until a certain point. The path forward, is to ignore the concept of intellectual property, which the internet has provided a means to do.

Post edited on 5th Mar 2022, 11:56am
>> No. 39315 [Edit]
>>39313
I mostly agree, but I still like to give credit to the people involved in the programs and libraries I use. Other than that, however, forcing one to upstream your specialized changes, for one, is retarded, or arbitrarily restricting a user's application of licensed software is dickish to say the least.
>> No. 39316 [Edit]
File 164659110293.jpg - (378.82KB , 1050x1480 , reimu and letty hugging.jpg )
39316
I've been thinking that this thread has already reached bump limit and someone should do another one, but I realized the OP image will be sticking around for quite a few years, likely, and now I feel that I'm not up to the task.
>> No. 39429 [Edit]
So as far as I know, japan doesn't ground their power outlets and electronics. Is this why they freak out so much in anime during power outages and warn each other to stay still?
>> No. 39910 [Edit]
>>39429
That's interesting, I didn't know that. I guess at least one country manages to be even less-safe than the US in terms of receptacle design. As I understand, the purpose of the ground is two-fold: 1) to provide a return path for leakage current (this is usually designed to be negligible, so it's often not even necessary for most appliances) 2) Ground pin is connected to the casing of an applicance, so in the case of abnormal operation where somehow hot gets connected to the casing, it provides a return path that immediately trips the breaker.

Neither of those would make any difference during a power outage. I wonder if all their appliances that would usually require 3-prong are double insualted or something. Or if they have residual current detection at the breaker level.

Also in more Japanese electricty madness, did you know that Japan has two separate power grids for each half that run at different frequencies?
>> No. 39916 [Edit]
>>39912
Looks like I posted in the wrong thread. How embarrassing.
Please, mod-sama, delete my foolishness.
>> No. 41922 [Edit]
I just want peace on earth, man.
>> No. 41972 [Edit]
Taipei has an ugly beauty to it. Individually, the typical concrete, tiled covered buildings, are ugly, but cram them together, throw up some neon lights, a tiny park with a Daoist temple crammed in the mix, add a few street vendors and the bustle of people and its downright charming.
Cities in Japan are much better put together, but I prefer the chaotic, gritty feeling of Taipei, and Treasure Hill is an interesting segment of that.
>> No. 42005 [Edit]
File 170193673911.jpg - (119.82KB , 662x1141 , Clipboard01.jpg )
42005
Painting is Terribly Difficult
https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v45/n24/julian-barnes/painting-is-terribly-difficult
>> No. 42027 [Edit]
Why do people with foot fetishes draw such ugly feet? And why are they always smoking?
>> No. 42028 [Edit]
>>42027
Find better artists? None of the ones I've seen have the things you mentioned.
>> No. 42031 [Edit]
File 170258022666.png - (211.08KB , 628x448 , javaphp.png )
42031
I just finished a class project that requires JSP, which I had never heard about before this. It's Java, and shitty, and I hate it, but it makes sense. By using it, the entire, colossal Java ecosystem becomes immediately available to you. No templates, no CGI.

PHP only came out 4 years prior, so I wonder why JSP didn't completely demolish it. At that time, Java was such a big deal, THE scripting language of the internet was made as a superficial imitation of it. So why didn't JSP catch on?

Post edited on 14th Dec 2023, 10:59am
>> No. 42036 [Edit]
>>42031
I think JSP was more used in enterprise. Probably one aspect is that shared hosting was more likely to offer php rather than the needed infrastructure to use jsp (jetty or whatever java server).
>> No. 42037 [Edit]
>>42031
Maybe it's because PHP is open source, so more people adopted it because having open source on your project tends to draw quite a few people to it and there is more of a 'community' around it, even if it might be inferior to other similar products. Not that I blame them, as opensource stuff does tend to have more beginner level resources, although that might just be bias on my part as most open source programming stuff tends to be sorta beginner friendly, like python.
>> No. 42038 [Edit]
>>42036
>shared hosting was more likely to offer php rather than the needed infrastructure to use jsp (jetty or whatever java server)
That seems kind of circular, it's not like every server supports PHP out of the box, but maybe the underlying reason is PHP's interpreter being lighter? Or just getting there first and being good enough.

>>42037
Java EE and JSP by extension are both open source, which was one of Java's main selling points.
>> No. 42039 [Edit]
>>42038
It's much easier to configure a self-serve system with PHP though. You basically just chuck your files in a directory, and can have apache handle it. You can also support perl, python or whatever cgi-compatible things existed. Supporting JSP seems to require its own separate stack and deployment is non-trivial.
>> No. 42040 [Edit]
File 170260742190.jpg - (365.75KB , 750x580 , 55b7f61d70cc6b41c27988f2719534db.jpg )
42040
>>42039
I looked it up, and found this old thread asking the same question.
https://www.sitepoint.com/community/t/why-jsp-is-not-that-popular-in-websites/7812

I guess resource usage was also one of the main factors.
>> No. 42055 [Edit]
File 17028374004.jpg - (119.44KB , 1200x746 , f797618557261cf0fc4fc55e9067c1d3.jpg )
42055
I wish the solstices and equinoxes were celebrated as holidays again. These days are objectively special, unlike some guy's supposed birthday. It's the natural thing to celebrate and the only reason it's not is because of the systematic destruction of what I call natural human culture. It has nothing to do with monotheism or polytheism, it's just pagans did it, so therefore it was deemed bad
>> No. 42071 [Edit]
>>42055
I celebrate the solstices throughout the year. I generally just spend an evening with my friends. We make a little fire and chat, perhaps pour a libation for a god or three.
>> No. 42120 [Edit]
File 170367512727.jpg - (247.87KB , 850x1258 , 20231228.jpg )
42120
>>42055
and make new year at the start of spring rather than the middle of winter.
>> No. 42121 [Edit]
>>42120
Then we could also renumber the months so that september = 7 like it was always supposed to be.
>> No. 42133 [Edit]
File 17038957173.jpg - (353.07KB , 2000x1265 , 20240101.jpg )
42133
>>42121
How about metric time like 10 hours a day?
>> No. 42156 [Edit]
I find myself increasingly asking ai for information after being frustrated by shitty search engine results. Do you think this is intentional, so people will rely more on ai?
>> No. 42157 [Edit]
>>42156
No, it's just that search engines are so terrible these days. They don't even index things properly, and they try so hard to avoid showing you so-called "misinformation" that it ends up censoring anything remotely interesting.
>> No. 42158 [Edit]
>Do you ever think about consensual tentacle sex and suddenly find yourself bad at driving rocket fueled remote controlled cars?
Yes.
>> No. 42233 [Edit]
Could we get a reset for this year? This month sucketh for me....
* New Year earthquake in JP; one of my friends was touring Japan at the time. He wasn't at the earthquake zone but his plans are all out of whack.
* Neighbour's dad and dog died.
* Birthday party cancelled due to pnuemonia.
* My grandma is sick.
Please allow for a return.

Ok, thanks. Bye.
>> No. 42236 [Edit]
File 170585552621.jpg - (534.49KB , 1428x2048 , 8601a58a336a63bac3aec0c33ceb8ecd.jpg )
42236
I don't like watching streams live, and I think I know why now. It's like being mute and ostensibly having a conversation, but the other person is just talking at you. Because there's a chat box, there's this false pretense that you have a voice in the conversation, but you're actually competing with hundreds for one person's attention. If you give them money, they'll read your question or comment, but they also respond to people who don't pay sometimes. It feels incredibly unbalanced and ultimately pointless. I'd rather have a normal conversation, and I bet streaming wouldn't be nearly as popular if there weren't so many people who lack a normal social life.
>> No. 42237 [Edit]
>>42236
It's called parasocial for a reason. It's even worse than how shallow conversations usually go anyway. We are living in the shadows of shadows of shadows, and even though sometimes new fantasies emerge to creep from the virtual into the real world, we just lose so much in the process it's not a miracle all of us are touched by melancholy.
>> No. 42238 [Edit]
>>42236
Well put. Worse yet is when they have chats that move so quickly that if you blink you'd miss a dozen comments. In those cases why bother at all?
>> No. 42239 [Edit]
>>42236
That's a cool drawing. The more reasonable people online say they use it as background noise to avoid loneliness but I prefer playing music.
>> No. 42241 [Edit]
>>42236
I like to watch livestreams occasionally, but it's always streams were less than 5-6 viewers at a time. Often you're the only person typing in the chat, so you do build that level of rapport.
>> No. 42256 [Edit]
There is so much deliciously lewd fanart of girls I'm not familiar with (usually from popular gacha or fots anime) posted every day. However, I still prefer to take care of my needs looking at characters I know.
>> No. 42257 [Edit]
>>42256
For me it's the other way around, I can't bring myself to look at characters I treasure with anything but pure eyes. I prefer to satisfy lust with those random gacha characters I don't even know the names of.
>> No. 42265 [Edit]
I thought this thread had reached bump limit already, have we created ponderings thread 3 too soon?
>> No. 42274 [Edit]
>>42257
It depends on the character and art. The more I like them the harder it is to find art that isn't distasteful. I don't mind doing it because I'm of the opinion that it can be a form of love, tenshi-types deserve love too.

Post edited on 4th Feb 2024, 2:43pm
>> No. 42345 [Edit]
File 17082204324.jpg - (52.03KB , 304x267 , sousa.jpg )
42345
I never really understood why fansubbing and scanlation became such a big phenomenon.

I'm not talking about bootlegs where the goal is to make money, but the stuff people upload for free.

I was told that it started out at college campuses with students passing around VHS tapes. I get that, because I assume the translators wanted to show this cool stuff to people around them, and watching the end product together in some dorm room was just as much a social event as was making the subs.

I can also understand translating one particular work that means a lot to you and that likely would never get a translation otherwise. For a while, I myself contemplated translating two somewhat obscure series I was very fond of.

But sitting alone in your room, working at breakneck speed to do same-day subs of random mediocre shows that you hardly even enjoy watching, for no pay and for little to no recognition from anyone you've ever met in person, and doing this for years on end?

I can't understand the mindset of those people.
>> No. 42346 [Edit]
>>42345
>working at breakneck speed to do same-day subs of random mediocre shows that you hardly even enjoy watching
Which sub groups did same day subs? At least for shows I watched I recall they were usually a day or two late. And you're probably underestimating the recognition aspect, if recognition were a trivial-issue then there wouldn't be any sub drama. Forget fansubbing, people used to do things like non-trivial cracks (for software, games) just for the fame of it.
>> No. 42347 [Edit]
>>42345
I was never really part of it but had a lot of friends in the space. The main motivators seemed to be:
1) Clout, especially back in the pre-simulcast era when getting speedsubs out was bragging rights
2) All your friends are there doing subs so you also do
3) They got used to doing it as habit
>> No. 42348 [Edit]
>>42346
>Which sub groups did same day subs?
I don't remember the names of the specific groups, I just remember /a/ talking about it now and then.
I only watched like 10 shows with English or Spanish subtitles before I learned Japanese.
>Forget fansubbing, people used to do things like non-trivial cracks (for software, games) just for the fame of it.
Cracking programs is probably very fun if you like challenging puzzles. It's also a skill that you can gradually get better at by doing it.
I've contributed to several open source apps, and I think programming can be very fun when you're not under pressure to release some product before a deadline, so I get that there are other motivations than just immediate monetary gain.

btw, half of the Perl ecosystem for asynchronous stuff was developed by one autist for his fansubbed anime server:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oe5fCzQtVsg

Unless you're really excited about the particular thing you're working on, translation work and subtitle timing etc. on the other hand is just tedious busywork once you've learned to use your tools and found a workflow, or at least to me it is. It's no wonder that nowadays so much of the job has already been mechanized by machine translations.
>> No. 42367 [Edit]
Recently, I decided to skim through How to Win Friends and Influence people for the shits and giggles since it's a pretty well-known book. One of the themes I noticed was that it was mostly about people pleasing. I realized a lot of it I had already been doing despite never having read the book. I didn't like the way that the book approached things. In my opinion, if you simply try to appease the person, let them take the lead, and let them feel like they are the center, then I think it leads to the potential where it leads to a dynamic where the person doesn't actually like you but spends time around you because you make them feel good about themselves - they are using you, essentially. I also feel like it leads to inadequate boundary setting. I've almost noticed that the techniques in this book almost mirror the description of "fawning" in Pete Walker's CPTSD related book, where you simply try to appease people in order to avoid conflict as a protection mechanism. I guess the other thing is that other people aren't that stupid and can pick up when you're trying to schmooze them, and since this book is pretty known, people are aware of these tactics. I feel like a lot of these self-help books are bullshit or are common sense.
>> No. 42368 [Edit]
>>42367
>How to Win Friends and Influence people
Ah the playbook for used car salesmen.
>> No. 42369 [Edit]
>>42367
It's outdated. I believe that's the book that started the self-help genre before the 50's even. They are common sense depending on your experience and the authors, who are usually rich CEOs and got lucky in life, only write them to satisfy their ego or to make more money, their advice doesn't apply to the average person. Some are ghostwritten or promote magical beliefs/BS.
There are exceptions, of course. The infamous "48 laws of power" is written by someone who used to work in Hollywood and was tired of the fake nice advice in them. Some of the laws are obvious and the poetic style can be a turn off. He uses historical examples in every law so it's a fun history book to read before bed in my eyes haha, I never finished it
>> No. 42370 [Edit]
File 170907974348.png - (286.04KB , 966x762 , 75611be510f4da4fdf5b301acc72a426.png )
42370
>>42369
>10. Infection: Avoid the Unhappy and Unlucky
>Avoid surrounding yourself with those who are unhappy and unlucky. Their negative energy will only bring you down.
We're all failing this one.
>> No. 42371 [Edit]
>>42369
Hmm, I've heard of this one, but I hadn't considered reading it. I almost hate shit like this, though, because it's so damn manipulative. I loathe fakeness and ingenuineness. At the same time, too much of the opposite is not good, either. However, I'm reminded of normalfags and how they operate. Do I really want to operate like a normalfag? Actually, I think these sorts of behaviors are what I hate most about people who are referred to as "psychopaths" - this sort of manipulativeness. It feels like such a weight to carry. I hate social games so much, even if they can bring me benefit.
>> No. 42380 [Edit]
File 170939951493.jpg - (60.59KB , 800x860 , fa83ea3c8df9b560fbaa678fa8e5df5b.jpg )
42380
Do you think Japanese being generally bad at English is intentional, as a means of insulating Japan from foreign influence? They have to know they're one of the worst in the world when it comes to English, and there's no way they couldn't find a better way to teach it than whatever they do now.
>> No. 42382 [Edit]
>>42380
Right, it has the net effect of serving as a soft "firewall" without their needing to actually implement any draconian China-like GFW. So if one was a conspiracy theorist you could probably say that the government surely knows that their existing English education programs have a terrible track record, but they have no motivation to change it for the above reasons.

Unfortunately the widespread availability of LLMs for translation will weaken that firewall anyhow.
>> No. 42386 [Edit]
>>42380
No. Public English education anywhere is bad in general with a few exceptions, more so if they use a vastly different writing system. As an ESL, most people I know who have a decent grasp of English here spent a lot of their free time on the internet and took specialized classes or could afford to travel abroad.
I assume good English education that works is reserved for private schools everywhere, including Japan. Popular language teaching methods are outdated and new ones are hard to implement because it would require convincing someone with an authority who could execute a reform that... popular intuitive methods like tests, extensive grammar study, drills, etc. don't work as much as people think
>>42382
>LLM
I think people underestimate how powerful MTL were berofe them. If there was going to be a big change it would have happened by now. You see apps that can MTL what you type/tell them instantly already but they aren't perfect and given how hard it would be even for a LLM to pick up constantly developing slang and grammar in different languages with all its uses, I doubt we'll see a big change anytime soon.
Companies using LLM to essentially do a slight better version of an official MTL still need to hire a quality checker with knowledge of the language if they want to 100% avoid errors. Similar to artists correcting their AI assisted illustrations, except MTLs already existed years before stable diffusion.
>> No. 42388 [Edit]
>>42386
>Public English education anywhere is bad in general with a few exceptions
India seems to do decently well at English education, as do most parts of the EU? Although that might just be because they're more connected with the anglosphere so they end up learning by osmosis or out of necessity.

>underestimate how powerful MTL were before
That's not the case: before deep-learning, most MTL was pretty poor in general, especially for languages whose grammar diverged from English even slightly. It's only around the 2010s that architectures such as LSTMs and RNNs showed promise in terms of language modeling, surpassing the SOTA of more bespoke statistical NLP systems at that time. Seq2Seq was one of the most prominent examples here.

These RNN/LSTM models were decent-ish for "English-like" languages yet they still lacked the semantic modeling capabilities that are needed for implicit-context-heavy languages like Japanese. It's only with the advent of transformer based models (e.g. GPT) that this became a "solved" problem (well almost, now the issue is getting the inference cost down.)

>If there was going to be a big change it would have happened by now.
Not quite, widespread access to LLMs is bottlenecked by compute cost at the moment. But you can already see that e.g. DeepL is order of magnitudes better than google translate at Japanese (I don't believe the precise architecture of DeepL was ever revealed, but given their timing it's probably some Attention-based thing. It also helps that being spun out of Linguee they have a quality dataset.)

>apps that can MTL what you type/tell them instantly already
See above; with the exception of DeepL (which itself is still probably more primitive "small language models" instead of the massive behemoth that is llama/gpt-4/etc.), LLMs have not yet been widely deployed for MTL, mainly due to cost.

>given how hard it would be even for a LLM to pick up constantly developing slang
That is part of the beauty with LLMs, they can be fine-tuned fairly easily. Coupled with plentiful access to data (which admittedly might be harder to come by now that everyone is starting to silo APIs), this is actually the "easy part".

> LLM to essentially do a slight better version of an official MTL still need to hire a quality checker with knowledge of the language
This is correct; however it is a matter of scale, it is far easier to QC an existing translation than to come up with your own, so more scripts can be translated with fewer human employees.
>> No. 42389 [Edit]
>>42388
>(well almost, now the issue is getting the inference cost down.)
Sounds like a job for SNNs
https://medium.com/@hiiask/spiking-neural-networks-in-neuromorphic-computing-fe671061470a
>SNNs are >100x more efficient than the best recurrent ANN and 1000x more efficient than LSTM.
On traditional hardware though, it'll be markedly slower.
https://news.ucsc.edu/2023/03/eshraghian-spikegpt.html

Post edited on 2nd Mar 2024, 2:19pm
>> No. 42390 [Edit]
>>42389
>Sounds like a job for SNNs
Not too sure of this. I actually have not heard of SNNs before this, but the model seems actually fairly similar to standard topologies, only difference is that you have an accumulator added before the activation function.

Any claims of efficiency needed to be verified rigorously with an apples to apples comparison, if you're comparing dedicated hardware against a CPU implementation then of course the dedicated hardware will win out. I'm not convinced this "neuromorphic" hardware is any better than just the standard systolic-array architecture for matmul accelerator.
>> No. 42391 [Edit]
File 170942082376.png - (20.98KB , 400x400 , 972815d9829ac5a8a7d078409221efa8.png )
42391
>>42390
>the model seems actually fairly similar to standard topologies, only difference is that you have an accumulator added before the activation function.
>Any claims of efficiency needed to be verified rigorously with an apples to apples comparison, if you're comparing dedicated hardware against a CPU implementation then of course the dedicated hardware will win out
I'm not familiar enough with neural networks to make those comparisons. I am taking an undergraduate class about neuromorphic computing though, and to paraphrase, my professor has said that in every task that's been tested, neuromorphic algorithms have been more energy efficient while being at least as accurate. I asked him if that was dependent on what hardware is used; he answered that while specialized hardware is faster, neuromorphic algorithms are more energy efficient on any hardware.

These are two of the papers him and a graduate student have written
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8967864
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9340948

Post edited on 2nd Mar 2024, 3:14pm
>> No. 42392 [Edit]
>>42391
> I am taking an undergraduate class about neuromorphic computing
Something about teaching a highly specialized non-mainstream field like neuromorphic computing without introduction to more standard traditional architectures is setting off alarm bells. If you haven't learned traditional architectures you have no point of reference. (And unlike say economics where one could actually start off with something like Austrian economics as an introduction given that it's not like "mainstream" schools have had any better luck, traditional networks have by objective metrics succeeded in the real-world, whereas spiking neural networks have been nothing more than a curiosity in academia).

>in every task that's been tested, neuromorphic algorithms have been more energy efficient while being at least as accurate
Again sets off alarm bells. If this is the case _regardless of hardware_ then people would obviously have deployed them in the real world by now. Either one of those does not hold, or it only works for "toy models" and doesn't scale to real-world problems. There is not much standard literature on SNNs so I am not qualified to say either way, but it just doesn't pass the sniff test. Machine Learning is not one of those academia-gated groups: assuming you aren't compute bottlenecked, if there is a good idea then it will be borne out by real-world trials (see diffusion models and LLaMa, where a lot many improvements came from independent researchers).

I found [1] from Geoff Hinton who is definitely qualified to have an opinion(tm) on this field, he seems to say the hardware might have potential but we don't yet have the algorithms to train a SNN for problems that we care about. Which to me roughly makes sense, you can make some handwavy argument about non-linearity making it hard to derive gradients and thus meaning you can't do backpropagation.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EDP4v-9TUA&t=2809
>> No. 42393 [Edit]
File 170942781571.png - (12.49KB , 400x400 , 3b0f81494a9860bf2f23bdd2b7858826.png )
42393
>>42392
I took an intro to AI class, but that was about stuff like A*; the most advanced topic covered was perceptrons. There's a deep learning and a machine learning class too, but I wasn't able take those for scheduling reasons. None of these 4 classes are a prerequisite for another. *shrug*

I find your skepticism overly pessimistic though. It sounds like you think there's chicanery going on. There will be more progress and I don't see why SNNs can't be applied to machine translation.

edit: Backpropagation is also possible
https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.08378

Post edited on 2nd Mar 2024, 5:11pm
>> No. 42394 [Edit]
>>42388
>they're more connected with the anglosphere so they end up learning by osmosis or out of necessity.
I can agree with this correction. Citizens in the EU are often raised bilingual to be able to communicate with close neighboring countries. Compare that to Latam where the majority of countries speak Spanish and people can have a well-paid job or political position without basic knowledge of English.
Free basic English classes in culturally and geographically isolated countries outside of the anglosphere are often seen as a mandatory subject in schools due to English being considered the global language rather than a strict necessity (I'm including Japan in this). It isn't taken as seriously as it should be. For reference, dedicated online English speaking Japanese learning communities are aware of the issues with the way Japanese is commonly taught but that's a general popular language pedagogy problem, in my opinion.

>That's not the case: before deep-learning...
Well, I'm sorry. I made that post under the dumb assumption that GoogleTL still uses SMT and DeepL being SMT (I have it bookmarked but never go beyond the /translate page so I never noticed). I have to agree because I did notice online translators slowly becoming better over the 2010s growing up and honestly, I'm not knowledgeable about technology as you can tell, I had to google some abbreviations to fully understand that post. I'm only skeptical of them being able to collect data to pick up slang unless they can get it from SNSs, but we'll see.

Post edited on 3rd Mar 2024, 4:24am
>> No. 42395 [Edit]
>>42394
>being able to collect data to pick up slang unless they can get it from SNSs
Also even if that slang never appears in the training set, a lot of it can be inferred from context. Again one of the strengths of LLMs is that they can handle "out of distribution" tokens with grace, in a manner similar to a human would where context is used to derive the most likely "meaning" for that token.
>> No. 42406 [Edit]
File 170976266144.jpg - (484.07KB , 800x1256 , 1655528803979704.jpg )
42406
I was lurking an old thread about imageboard addiction and one anon pointed out something I hadn't considered about their appeal among the repetitive posts. Besides being able to express yourself anonymously and a low commitment to conversation, it works as a way to create and be creative with the words and images you use, ¨The thrill begins when you start typing and ends when you click SUBMIT¨(or reply). When I first tried to limit my time on them years ago, switching to lurking worked. I didn't have to check to see if I got any replies and eventually I did something else. I'm taking this to heart because I've been procastinating and there are other creative projects I want to do in my free time.

>>42370
>>42371
#18 is the anti-neet law. I don't think it's a good idea to take that book seriously unless you are forced to deal with certain people or for self reflection.
>> No. 42408 [Edit]
Imageboards made me realize that hierarchies are not required for culture and norms to exist, and it made me wonder if it was possible for an imageboard without a distinct culture to exist. I was also considering how giving an individual an identity leads to distinction, which leads to classification and then the eventual formation of a hierarchy. However, I am unsure if imageboards are truly free of hierarchy. There are "mods" and "admins." Then, there are also tripfags. Another instance of this, is where those do not follow the board culture or unspoken rules are deemed as outsiders. But, contrary to this, the outsider may become the "insider" by simply lurking, getting to understand the culture, and refraining from using "outsider" language, which is something that can be changed. A lot of hierarchies in real life are often formed based on traits of individuals that are pre-determined by uncontrollable life circumstances or genetics. For instance, your wealth, your looks, and your race. There is also the thing in real life where an individual's status in a group is determined by how long they have been in the group. As a result of it, their thoughts and opinions will have greater weight than those who have a lower status. But, on imageboards this does not occur because everyone is anonymous, excluding moderators, admins, and places where anon is not forced. You never know truly who you are talking to. You may be arguing with one anon in a thread and then agreeing with him in another. My thoughts is that all imageboards have an individual "common writing style" where users unconsciouly adhere to a writing style that all of the other anons on the board use. I mean anonymity can be broken by having an overly unique posting style. Again, though, this can be remedied by simply lurking and absorbing the culture. But, to go back to my other train of thought - the idea of an imageboard without a unique culture - without gate-keeping, without having unspoken rules, without having norms, will this draw in the wrong sort of individuals - not the types of people you see on imageboards but those you might see on more common social media websites -- the types of individuals who are predisposed to form cliques. Is the differentiation of the "outsider" and the "insider" inevitable in imageboards?
>> No. 42409 [Edit]
>>42408
>an imageboard without a distinct culture to exist
An imageboard without a culture would just be entirely full of shitposting, since there would be no real "rules" to enforce I think. You would need some standard to hold the posters to otherwise you will have people kicked out of everywhere else, not to mention that people would run bots and spam and other such things, which would make the site ungovernable. I suppose that would be an imageboard without any real culture, unless you consider a complete lack of standards and chaos a 'culture', but it would be near unusable.

>Imageboards made me realize that hierarchies are not required for culture and norms to exist
I agree with the points you have raised, although I wouldn't really put tripfags in the hiearchy as they should be anons anytime they aren't using their trip for the designated purpose, but I do think the amount of time someone has spent on an imageboard will always be a contributing factor to the "hiearchy" as someone who has been around for a while, but again it isn't really much of a factor as you said it would be impossible to know just how long someone has been there, and going around bragging about being an oldfag who has been around 20 years is seen as uncouth in most places. Very much unlike the real world, where just on virtue of being someone for a while gives you authority over others, although this is dependant on the situation, more often than not there will be some authority to go with seniority.

>Is the differentiation of the "outsider" and the "insider" inevitable in imageboards
Yes, I think it is an inevitability, but on the other hand it's far easier to converse on an imageboard than anywhere else. In real life or on site such as twitter or reddit, it would be quite difficult to have any sort of meaningful discussion with someone, as sites like those are by their nature against the spirit of a completely unbound conversation, as you have to either have a brand new account or allow someone to view all your past discussions, tainting the conversation. You could identify someone based on posting style or identify someone based on the content of their posts, but usually it's an anonymous discussion unless you are intentionally bringing attention to yourself. I don't think it's a bad thing to have an outsider and insider differentiation, but in real life, as you said, it's very much based on factors far outside your control, and in many cases people will decide they dislike your or not based purely on appearance, discounting all else. This is true whether it's in a professional or academix context, or even when trying to make friends.

I also think that in general ford drivers have begun to tend towards violent outbursts, although I'm not sure whether this has been a recent development or not, I have noticed more "normal people" becoming increasingly aggravated and quick tempered. I think it's a natural result or how hectic the world has become, as most people can't keep up so they either turn to drugs or they are eternally on edge and ready to snap, taking their anger out even when there was no need to do so. I had a recent interaction with someone, and what had been a simple, and what I had thought innocent, question resulted in them becoming aggravated with me over a misunderstanding on their part, with them swearing at me in anger and accusing me of attempting to trick them. This is someone I've had some interaction with before, although I was not remotely close to being their friend, and I suppose it just starkly reminded me how quick people are to snap when you are perceived as an outsider to them, and they seem to see little aversion for nasty behaviour towards others, even if such behaviour is unwarranted. Not to mention how many people act when behind the wheel of a car.
>> No. 42410 [Edit]
>>42409
Also, I was thinking a little more, and I might retract what I said about moderators and admins as part of my example. I've noticed that in imageboards specifically that admins, mods, and tripfags, not in the mode you mention, are particularly scorned. (Maybe "scorned" is not the word - but I definitely see major pushback between imageboard users and any authority; it may also be due to contrarianism.) As you said, it is uncouth to brag about being an oldfag, and I am almost thinking that this applies to those who try to call some sort of attention to their status, at all. I never really see the ass-kissing of mods/admins on imageboards that you see on forums and Reddit. There just seems to be something inherent in the design and innate culture of imageboards which prevents a solid hierarchy from forming. Although a "hierarchy" may exist, it is minimal, and it has little effect on imageboards.
>although I wouldn't really put tripfags in the hiearchy as they should be anons anytime they aren't using their trip for the designated purpose
I think that's a valid use for a trip. When I was referring to tripfags, I was referring more to the attentionwhore types who seem to want to have an "identity" on imageboards. But for instances where a trip may be needed, I wouldn't put them in the hierarchy, either.
>view all your past discussions, tainting the conversation.
Ah, yes, that is what I dislike precisely about non-anonymous forms of communication online. Having a post history allows users to infer more details about them than they directly share in a conversation. These details might be about aspects of themselves which they can not control, and some of the real-life dynamics start to leak into the internet. Not just a seniority bias seeps in, but many other pre-conceived biases others may have about you seep in, as well. This might be a controversial take, but I've noticed that the media tends to overwhelmingly paint imageboards as "misogynistic" and "racist." However, I was thinking that imageboards would almost be better for marginalized groups because everyone is able to be on an equal footing, provided you do not share details about yourself which would cause others to judge you based on pre-conceived notions of your characteristics, whether that be your looks, your wealth, or some other thing.
>I also think that in general ford drivers have begun to tend towards violent outbursts, although I'm not sure whether this has been a recent development or not, I have noticed more "normal people" becoming increasingly aggravated and quick tempered. I think it's a natural result or how hectic the world has become, as most people can't keep up so they either turn to drugs or they are eternally on edge and ready to snap, taking their anger out even when there was no need to do so.
I agree with you. I have noticed this, too. I'm not sure, but I've noticed that the world and the internet in general have skewed towards this way in 2016, but it may have been earlier than that. I guess people have become extremely polarized on all sides. All opinions are the wrong opinion to have because they will inevitably upset someone. It does not matter how benign or innocent what you say is; it can be twisted in a million different ways. But, to add to the second part of what you said, I also think it has to do with societal standards becoming increasingly unrealistic while it becomes more and more difficult to meet those standards due to the current state of the world. However, I don't think it's just causing aggression and violence, but I think it's causing people to look for strange ways of deluding themselves in order to be able to function. Everyone seems really obsessed with self-pathologization. If they look at themselves and see a characteristic that is "odd," then they immediately jump to suggesting that they are an "autist" or a "schizo" - not just in a joking manner - but it genuinely seems like there are a lot of people who genuinely think these things. I feel like people use these diagnoses to ease societal pressures on themselves and to be able to tell themselves that it is okay that they are not living up to the unrealistic standards that are in place. However, I also think that this is due to a breakdown in people's ability to develop an identity as a result of being unable to find a community in real life because everyone is so isolated; both due to social media usage and because no one really goes outside anymore. If they do, then they remain shut down. Otherwise, what is considered "normal" has become so narrow and confined, and I think that puts quite a bit of stress on people. Then, there is also the problem that there are just simply so many people on the planet, and jobs are limited, which creates a sense of fierce competitiveness to survive. This is also a struggle for those with atypical life circumstances who manage to find themselves "behind." But, even those without those circumstances people experience intense pressure.
Then, as a final small comment on how people act in cars, I'm honestly scared at how non-chalantly people take driving to be. When I first started driving, I had pretty severe anxiety about it, and I struggled with those implications - that I was driving a thousand pound vehicle that could kill anyone with ease. Then, there was the thought that one small mistake could send my insurance prices through the roof. It took me way longer to learn to drive than average for that reason. I effectively had to learn to dissociate from my emotions to be able to drive. Yet, others never seem to really think of these things.
>> No. 42418 [Edit]
> but I definitely see major pushback between imageboard users and any authority
It depends on the board I think. On 4chan this is definitely the case since probably many see the mods as only contributing to the problem rather than solving it. On TC there isn't any such disparity (in fact they blend in so seamlessly that I genuinely don't know if there are any mods besides Tohno himself). On the infamous orange-bar site, the mods are viewed fairly positively.

>I'm honestly scared at how non-chalantly people take driving to be
I can't drive for the same reason.
>> No. 42422 [Edit]
>>42418
>the infamous orange-bar site
Which site?
>> No. 42425 [Edit]
>>42422
hacker news
>> No. 42426 [Edit]
>>42418
>the mods are viewed fairly positively
There's only one guy doing it these days too.
>> No. 42427 [Edit]
>>42426
I was about to ask about Scott (sctb), but it seems you're right, he left around 2020 and now it's just Dan. That's fairly impressive. The overall moderation system isn't perfect (there's clear political and social bias in terms of which articles get flagged and automatically taken down), but in terms of direct human moderation Dan always seemed fairly hands-off.
>> No. 42429 [Edit]
>>42427
I pretty much agree.

>Dan always seemed fairly hands-off.
Even though he's being paid to do this, I cannot help but mention my appreciation for his rather even-handed and cool approach to moderation. Not many in his position would be able to do the same, as seen on other sites.
>> No. 42521 [Edit]
File 171270518757.jpg - (0.97MB , 1013x1433 , FSJod2WaAAEA6cp.jpg )
42521
Whenever music sounds interesting enough, people say it sounds like it comes from a video game. That's probably because video games are the only time they can remember hearing music with a strong melody and musical development.
>> No. 42548 [Edit]
File 171349155865.jpg - (1.03MB , 2126x3047 , 170865330432.jpg )
42548
I've noticed a pattern where women who represent themselves with a character that has pink hair and cat ears, is probably a cunt. Mikeneko and Nyanners come to mind. You think there's something to this? Maybe it's a form of compensation or concealment. Pink hair and cat ears are fine on their own. Together it's obviously excessive and saccharine, so only somebody with a twisted mind would go for that look.
>> No. 42549 [Edit]
File 171349626080.jpg - (264.59KB , 1000x1553 , GLfJRH1XgAAFVDP.jpg )
42549
>>42548
I think this is a bias where people assume that if someone presents themselves in a certain way they must be a nice person. It happens in real life too, like how others assume people into anime must be meek and nerdy and are surprised when they form their own groups in their communities like everyone else, then they complain about how nerds are surprisingly rude when it's their fault for judging people by their appearance and believing that stereotypes apply to everyone.
Or maybe my mind is twisted because I've always liked customizing my characters, profiles and avis on the internet in a way that can be described as excessive and saccharine. The internet is the only place I can do that, I simply like the way it looks.
Honestly, knowing myself, I can safely say people who do that tend to think in extremes but at least I'm self aware and try not to be a cunt. Assuming those women are influencers, they probably do it to keep up an extremely positive feminine image of themselves and gain followers.
>> No. 42550 [Edit]
>>42549
>bias where people assume that if someone presents themselves in a certain way they must be a nice person
I wonder if that's part of the reason why a lot of people on social media tend to have anime girls as profile pictures.
>> No. 42551 [Edit]
File 17135018081.jpg - (122.61KB , 500x500 , c51d6b30f882f57170d846eaed60a261.jpg )
42551
>>42550
I don't like misrepresenting myself, so I always use PFPs like this. It's Japan related, but also kind of weird and off-putting without being overtly risque.

Post edited on 18th Apr 2024, 9:44pm
>> No. 42552 [Edit]
>>42550
The ones that use cropped images from h-manga as their avatars are 9/10 times going to be the worst.
>> No. 42553 [Edit]
File 171353692770.png - (1.07MB , 986x1462 , 4369800987654.png )
42553
>>42548
>>42549
>>42550
i think you all are overanalyzing things on some level, i think most people just choose an image or a character they like without putting much thought into it. i've noticed i tend to usually set my pfp to girls, but it's usually because i either like the character or the design a lot (assuming i even put that much thought into it, there are a couple of times i've just chosen what the last saved image was).
in the case of nyanners, specifically, it's odd, though, since she seems to not even like things like that in the first place.
>>42552
but...some of my favorite characters are from ero-doujin...
>> No. 42556 [Edit]
>>42521
I love listening to 70's prog rock and electronic music and you can tell many video game composers took inspiration from them.
Like nobuo uematsu from triumvirat and ELP, or ZUN and ZUNTATA from yellow magic orchestra
>> No. 42559 [Edit]
>>42556
Not to mention the relatively many Japanese prog rock groups that are heavily influenced by ELP. There was even a "girl band" that played ELP-esque music.
>> No. 42560 [Edit]
>>42388
Here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13813
It was common anecdotally that gpt-4 blew away gtranslate and even deepl for languages like Japanese, but here's some quantitative analysis of that.
>> No. 42637 [Edit]
File 171721480914.jpg - (624.86KB , 1112x1600 , b814cbf391302d2572beb5a1542521ae.jpg )
42637
I've never thought about it before, but French food is massively overrated. Before I unquestioningly accepted that it's "good", but in retrospect, I think it's an emperor has no clothes situation. Yes it was highly influential and innovative. Yes, they have great bakery. Yes it's better than other western European cuisine(not that that's saying much). None of this changes that's it's overrated.

What are the classic, famous dishes? With Italian, I can immediately come up with stuff that's memorable, distinct, and I love. Caprese salad, gnocchi, squid ink pasta, salami, pizza of course, burrata, bruschetta. What French food can I think of? Quiche. Onion soup. Croissant. Ratatouille... Brie? None of which I particularly like. Didn't love Cajun either when I tried it in New Orleans. Even Germans have a signature dish I really like in Bratwurst.

Visually it's boring. Coq au vin is just chicken and vegetables, with some brown sauce. Reminds me of the boring home cooking I grew up with. Then you look at oyakodon, and it POPS. It's so colorful and interesting. Look at char siu. Ramen. Sushi. I see East Asian food, and immediately want to try it based on how it looks alone.

Basically, French cuisine is either fussy and massively overpriced, or boring peasant food. American and British food sucks, so influencing those doesn't count for much. Maybe I'm just ignorant, but food usually isn't a hard sell for me even if I haven't tried it. If it's so amazing, why isn't that more obvious?

Post edited on 31st May 2024, 9:37pm
>> No. 42638 [Edit]
>>42637
I guess when I think of french food, the only thing that comes to my uncultured (pun intended) mind is bread and pastries.
>> No. 42645 [Edit]
Playing MMORPGs seems like one of the best predictors for someone ending up a miserable, completely unproductive fuckup. Not only is it a stereotype in fiction, I even known somebody like that. MMOs are the original "lifestyle" games, and there's no limit to the amount of time they can suck up. On top of that, their repetitive, grindy gameplay is a precursor to mobile games, but unlike those, you also have to be shut-in to be knee-deep in an MMO.

Post edited on 2nd Jun 2024, 3:40pm
>> No. 42646 [Edit]
>>42645
I had it hit me a few months back about how much of my time "gaming" has really been spent in a couple of games. 6500 hours in Runescape (osrs/rs3), ~2K hours in eu4, god knows how many hours in Minecraft.

I think growing up poor wired me to isolate and seek out cheap forms of escapism.
>> No. 42648 [Edit]
>>42646
The guy I know is into FF14. Told me he hasn't played any other FF games, and only started this one because his online friends did too. He's also never seen any anime, because he's "too lazy" to pirate them.

Post edited on 2nd Jun 2024, 6:26pm
>> No. 42650 [Edit]
>>42645
>>42646
It's funny, I always had one foot out of that pond. I felt like I wasted a lot of time, but also it didn't stop me from living life, or at least getting shit I wanted done, done. Before a particular MMO I spent most (or second most) of my time on shut down I checked the hours played. 1538. Over two months of play over the span of about seven or eight years. It really felt a lot more.
>> No. 42652 [Edit]
I think reading for recreation hurts me much in the same way any other form of escapism. It's in many ways better than playing games or watching anime though, because it still requires you to exert some effort, use imaginations, etc. I simply feel empty to a degree after a book I was interested in, even if I've been for 10+ hours in a row. I feel outright dumb after even 6 hours of anime/games. That's how I conclude books are healthier. Doesn't prevent them from hurting me though. I think recreation is harmful, actually. Maybe I'm doing it wrong.
>> No. 42653 [Edit]
This thread is 12 years old. Roughly 900 posts. 75 posts per year. 6.25 posts per month. 0.2 posts per day. Which is one post every five days.
>> No. 42654 [Edit]
>>42653
You could scrape the actual timestamps and then do some plots! I bet if you plot the delta between posts you would see clusters where people respond to each other in a flurry then things settle back down.
>> No. 42655 [Edit]
File 171751898423.jpg - (477.15KB , 1654x2339 , img.jpg )
42655
I don't know how to plot, but here's sorted data as zip archive attached to picrel. A few years ago I could do it myself but now I'm beyond mediocrity and can't even figure out how to calculate amount of posts per day.
>> No. 42656 [Edit]
File 171752606914.png - (63.11KB , 1606x826 , pondering plot.png )
42656
>>42654
Here ya go.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import numpy as np from datetime import datetime from datetime import timedelta data = [] #np.empty(0, dtype="datetime64[ns]") dt_string = '%m/%d/%y(%a)%H:%M' file = open("data", 'r') Lines = file.readlines() for line in Lines: dp = datetime.strptime(line.strip(), dt_string) data.append(dp) data = np.array(data) delta = np.diff(data) / timedelta(days=1) plt.plot(delta) plt.xlabel('Index') plt.ylabel('Time Δ(days)') for i, time_stamp in enumerate(data[1:]): if delta[i] > 200: plt.annotate(time_stamp, (i,delta[i]), fontsize=6) plt.show()

>> No. 42657 [Edit]
>>42656
log-scale the y-axis to magnify the low-end?
>> No. 42658 [Edit]
>>42657
Also I think probably a different visualization might be cooler:
x-axis as time, y-axis as time since last post. I can't remember what it's called, time-to-event / survival plot?

This should give a better sense of relative time rather than using numerical post index for x-axis.
>> No. 42659 [Edit]
>>42656
what exactly does it plot?
>> No. 42661 [Edit]
File 171756062065.png - (57.41KB , 1602x816 , pondering scatter.png )
42661
>>42658
>time-to-event / survival plot?
I looked those up, and they seem more applicable to medical or mechanical data. So I used your other suggestions and made it a scatterplot.
>>42659
The point with 2023-11-21 for instance indicates that a post was made on that date, and it was around 500 days since the last one.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import matplotlib.dates as dts import numpy as np from datetime import datetime from datetime import timedelta data = [] #np.empty(0, dtype="datetime64[ns]") dt_string = '%m/%d/%y(%a)%H:%M' file = open("data", 'r') Lines = file.readlines() for line in Lines: dp = datetime.strptime(line.strip(), dt_string) data.append(dp) data = np.array(data) delta = np.diff(data) / timedelta(days=1) plt.scatter(data[1:], delta) plt.grid(True) plt.yscale('symlog') plt.xlabel('Time') plt.ylabel('Time Δ(days)') for i, time_stamp in enumerate(data[1:]): if delta[i] > 200: plt.annotate(time_stamp, (data[i+1],delta[i]),fontsize=6) plt.show()


Post edited on 4th Jun 2024, 9:11pm
>> No. 42662 [Edit]
>>42661
>time-to-event / survival plot?
>I looked those up, and they seem more applicable to medical or mechanical dat
Yeah TTE / survial is probably not the right term for the "time vs time since last event" graph I was thinking of and which you plotted.

I've seen such a plot used before for monitoring setups (e.g. time since last failure, or cumulative delay since last event); maybe it's called a cumulative time graph or something? The idea is that it's sort of like a 1D scatter / dot plot / strip plot where you directly get a sense of the density of posts in a time interval, but then you also take advantage of the y-axis to 1) avoid too many overlapping points if the delta intervals (y) are of a different order of magnitude than the monitoring period (x), and 2) draw more attention to the pacing of events (e.g. events that deviate from a periodic pacing would be graphed as fluctuations in a horizontal line, which is easier to make out visually than seeing fluctuations in density.


So your plot is really cool. You can immediately see on X axis the time periods when TC was active (seems like TC, or at least this thread, died a bit from 2016-2020 before being revived during covid and then again this year. And likewise that most activity occurs within 1-10 days of previous post as people reply to each other.
>> No. 42663 [Edit]
File 171757357631.png - (90.60KB , 1592x824 , pondering scatter.png )
42663
By giving the points an alpha value, I got this. Bit easier to see the density of clusters.
>> No. 42664 [Edit]
File 17175932389.png - (400.21KB , 9600x1080 , graph.png )
42664
>python
seethes
See how autists do it.
$ cat <<EOF > script.awk
BEGIN {
i = 0
}
{
split ($0, a, /\/|\(|\)|:/)
str = sprintf ("20%d %d %d %d %d 0", a[3], a[1], a[2], a[5], a[6]);
ts[i] = mktime (str)
i++
}
END {
d = mktime ("2024 1 2 1 1 1") - mktime ("2024 1 1 1 1 1")
diff[1] = 0
asort (ts)
for (j = 2; j <= length (ts); j++) {
diff[j] = (ts[j] - ts[j - 1]) / d
}
for (j = 1; j <= length(ts); j++) {
print strftime("%F-%H:%M", ts[j]) "," sprintf("%.10f", diff[j])
}
}
EOF
$ cat <<EOF > data.gnuplot
set terminal svg font "Liberation Serif,18" size 9600,1080 \
background "white"
set output "graph.svg"
set datafile separator comma
set xdata time
set format x "%Y"
set xlabel "Year"
set mxtics 12
set ylabel "Days since last post"
set logscale y
set grid
set timefmt "%Y-%m-%d-%H:%M"
plot 'data' using 1:2 title "" with points pointtype 7 pointsize 1 \
linecolor rgb "#c8000000"
EOF
$ regex='[0-9]{2}/[0-9]{2}/[0-9]{2}\([a-zA-Z]{3}\)[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}'
$ curl -sf "http://tohno-chan.com/ot/res/16448.html" | grep -E "$regex" | awk -f script.awk - > data
$ gnuplot data.gnuplot
$ inkscape -d 150 -o graph.png graph.svg

>> No. 42665 [Edit]
File 171759347761.png - (699.70KB , 9600x1080 , graph.png )
42665
Or even
set grid mxtics xtics mytics ytics
>> No. 42667 [Edit]
>>42664
Done some post formatting.
$ cat <<EOF > script.awk BEGIN { i = 0 } { split ($0, a, /\/|\(|\)|:/) str = sprintf ("20%d %d %d %d %d 0", a[3], a[1], a[2], a[5], a[6]); ts[i] = mktime (str) i++ } END { d = mktime ("2024 1 2 1 1 1") - mktime ("2024 1 1 1 1 1") diff[1] = 0 asort (ts) for (j = 2; j <= length (ts); j++) { diff[j] = (ts[j] - ts[j - 1]) / d } for (j = 1; j <= length(ts); j++) { print strftime("%F-%H:%M", ts[j]) "," sprintf("%.10f", diff[j]) } } EOF $ cat <<EOF > data.gnuplot set terminal svg font "Liberation Serif,18" size 9600,1080 \ background "white" set output "graph.svg" set datafile separator comma set xdata time set format x "%Y" set xlabel "Year" set mxtics 12 set ylabel "Days since last post" set logscale y set grid set grid mxtics xtics mytics ytics set timefmt "%Y-%m-%d-%H:%M" plot 'data' using 1:2 title "" with points pointtype 7 pointsize 1 \ linecolor rgb "#c8000000" EOF $ regex='[0-9]{2}/[0-9]{2}/[0-9]{2}\([a-zA-Z]{3}\)[0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}' $ curl -sf "http://tohno-chan.com/ot/res/16448.html" | grep -E "$regex" | awk -f script.awk - > data $ gnuplot data.gnuplot $ inkscape -d 150 -o graph.png graph.svg

>> No. 42668 [Edit]
File 171764528278.gif - (2.87MB , 6336x5824 , scatter.gif )
42668
Here's a comparison of /ot/ and /mai/'s activity over the years using two long-standing threads in each。Side note, the process of posting this took waaaaaay too much effort.
import matplotlib。pyplot as plt import numpy as np from datetime import timedelta from time_extract import get_timestamps def plot_data(filename, color, marker): plt。grid(True) plt。yscale('symlog') plt。xlabel('Time') plt。ylabel('Time Δ(days)') data = get_timestamps(filename) delta = np。diff(data) / timedelta(days=1) plt。scatter(data[1:], delta, alpha=0。1, c=color, marker=marker) for i, time_stamp in enumerate(data[1:]): if delta[i] > 200: plt。annotate(time_stamp。date(), (data[i+1],delta[i]),fontsize=8) plt。subplot(2, 1, 1) plt。title('/ot/') #Ponderings general plot_data('ot_16448。txt', 'steelblue', 'o') #Dream thread plot_data('ot_521。txt', 'cadetblue', 'D') plt。subplot(2, 1, 2) plt。title('/mai/') #Who your waifu is plot_data('mai_5。txt', 'orchid', 'o') #Share your daily waifu experience plot_data('mai_8705。txt', 'palevioletred', 'D') plt。gcf()。set_size_inches(15, 14) plt。savefig('scatter', dpi=500)

time_extract
import re import numpy as np from datetime import datetime ts_reg = r'<span class="postername"。*<\/span>\s*(。*)' dt_string = '%m/%d/%y(%a)%H:%M' def get_timestamps(filename): with open(filename, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as file: txt = file。read() matches = re。findall(ts_reg, txt) data = [] for match in matches: dp = datetime。strptime(match, dt_string) data。append(dp) return np。array(data)

>> No. 42694 [Edit]
It seems despite all my efforts I am fake. Not superficially, but with my whole being. My consciousness is fake. In retrospect I can't relate to things as if I have done them. I know I was there when they were done but it's as if the actions themselves are not mine. Just thought it's very strange.
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]

View catalog

Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason  


[Home] [Manage]



[ Rules ] [ an / foe / ma / mp3 / vg / vn ] [ cr / fig / navi ] [ mai / ot / so / tat ] [ arc / ddl / irc / lol / ns / pic ] [ home ]