>>
|
No. 29693
[Edit]
You're a good internet citizen for 80-char wrapping your posts at least. And for what it's worth you write well, so your ability to verbally communicate seems fine.
>IQ test with a psychiatrist and I got an actual result (I scored below 85)
I don't know enough about your situation to make a comment, but I guess society's whitewashing of IQ differences is annoying. The difference is sort of obvious and undeniable: an ability to pick up patterns and the underlying intuition just from examples without needing to be explicitly taught it. That said, at least for the fields I'm familiar with (e.g. STEM-related) I think past some lower-bound, IQ can be compensated for with practice and exposure. (I don't know what that lower-bound is though, so it would be patronizing to offer any false notion of reassurance)
>I'm patient, friendly, listen to them and try hard, but I can still feel how people get pissed off
I feel bad because I think I do this [get pissed off]. I could never be a teacher, I like explaining things but I can only explain things in the way I understand it and with an assumption of being familiar with all the other thoughts.
>POSIX shell scripting
I guess that's at least one thing I can provide concrete advice for without coming off as an asshat: writing POSIX shell scripts is pure masochism. The thing doesn't even have proper arrays, using something like Python (with its subprocess library) would surely seem easier.
>Thanks for reading.
>Despite being hopeless and frustrated, I still try to learn new things, but it tends to be a fruitless endeavour.
>>29692
It's a really touching post. Even if the underlying situation may not be relatable (by definition) to most people, the conveyed sense of frustration and desperation at being curious and _wanting to_ but being unable to properly explore that curiosity is really heart-rending. It reminded me of Flowers for Algernon (I would suggesting reading it, if you haven't already).
|