>>
|
No. 19408
[Edit]
File
142091688465.jpg
- (12.14KB
, 447x117
, underline.jpg
)
>>19406
I was instructed to read it when I started taking courses on history and philosophy of science; the only thing I remember from it is the concept of quick view: to read the index, and then only the first sentence of each paragraph of the text. If the book is well written, the main ideas should be there and the rest is just their development; it's not perfect but, as they stressed, it's better than nothing. It proved really helpful when I was forced to go through 500+ pages books in a short time (and I'm the slowest reader ever); that way you do quickly get a general idea of the subject.
Another great thing to do, especially with pdf and such, is to read exclusively the text around key words. Examples:
1) In just one seat, I could easily and fairly get through Kuhn's main thesis in 'The Structure of Scientific Revolutions' by only reading around the terms "Copernicus" and "copernican".
2) In just one seat, I could grasp the core of Baudrillard's philosophy by just reading around the term "reality" throughout several works of him (I actually saved those notes in one single file and it became extremely handy).
However, the most important thing, for me at least, is to underline and make marks of the important parts as you read. Normally one day after I read something I forgot pretty much everything except some of the marked stuff (the more dramatic the visual mark, the best it sticks in my mind) and, in any case, it makes it WAY easier to read it a second time. I even underline fiction books too with favorite parts, like taking screencaps from the best parts of an anime. I underline and take notes of fucking everything.
Post edited on 10th Jan 2015, 11:40am
|