>>
Anonymous
01/14/25(Tue)22:30
No. 22170
[Edit ]
>>21899
Some of this resonates with me. There was a pixiv artist that drew lewd sketches of an original character. Then suddenly he posts a picture of NTR with that character, before going back to the usual stuff.
I was pretty distraught by it. I had sort of looked up the artist, and seeing him suddenly do this NTR one-shot really messed with my mind. Like I always do I started overanalyzing and philosophically analyzing things, and I realized there's sort of two issues at play: how you interpret art, and the relationship between the artist and the art.
Something I hadn't realized is that to me personally the art also becomes a reflection of the artist's mind. When I see an absolutely amazing show, I realize that it's the product of someone's vision, and that makes me appreciate them: not in some sense of adoration but that someone had such a beautiful vision they wanted to share with the world, and the passion to bring it to life. To me otaku media represents the best of humanity, some sort of ideal world where higher ideals are explored. And so obviously finding out that someone has no problems with NTR is a blow when you have that perspective. So I realized that's partly where some of my discontent came from.
Now of course we cannot fully know the intent of the artist and the context with which a piece is drawn. For instance, does the artist making a NTR one-shot mean that he endorses NTR? Does it mean he assumes most people can tell it's just fiction? Was the piece created purely as a challenge to express emotions that he normally wouldn't draw? Does he even realize that people might be hurt when he publishes such stuff?
There's a lot of context that's missing, so perhaps it's not a good idea to closely tie art to artist. Maybe at best you can say that each piece is a "slice" of the artist's own vision, and just as humans are complex and sometimes contradictory, so too can those individual pieces contradict each other.
There's a related phenomenon I experienced when you have other artists drawing NTR of existing characters. Does the fact that some random artist creates NTR of X imply anything about the character of X in canon? On the face of it, claiming so is absurd. And yet nonetheless it is deeply upsetting, because it establishes its own narrative in your mind. In such cases it might help to reframe it as the random artist "coercing" the character, or rather their effigy, into the actions. The true character lives only in your mind as your own unique interpretation, and that gives you the power to discard conflicting narratives. At an intuitive level, you realize this: if you stumble upon NTR of a character you are close to, your instinct is not to accept it, but a visceral "that's not what she's like!" response.
Now applying all these ramblings to your situation: you have a character you formed a bond with, and the artist said that she's not a virgin. Does anything in her actions or personality imply that she's not? I'm guessing not since you only found out by asking the author. So the question becomes how you let that artist's words shape your own interpretation. It's difficult, because of that inherent link between art/artist that most people seem to have. It's certainly the perspective of some waifuists to treat the artist as a god, and everything he says becomes canon.
But I don't think that's a productive viewpoint. Waifuism is effectively a self-constructed religion. It's a brilliant mind-hack, when you find a waifu who resonates with you and you feel a strong bond with, what you effectively have found is a personality type that becomes an anthropomorphization of "higher values" in a way that resonates with you. Telling someone that "they deserve love/are loved" feels like empty words. Telling someone that "Jesus loves them" only ever makes sense to someone who's been brainwashed by abrahamic religions. But when that person sees how unconditional love and kindness is possible in the platonic 2D realm, and that those same values can be yours by simply holding the waifu in your heart and mind? Now your waifu's personality becomes a part of your own psyche, and same for the values that come with it.
The takeaway though is that there's strictly nothing special about something being "canon", it's a matter of the extent to which you can relate with an entire cohesive personality. I'd even argue that it's possible for "waifuism" to be practiced with a completely made up character (that's basically tulpamancy), it's just a label difference. But it's much easier to adopt an existing fully-fleshed narrative of a character that has a well-defined personality and life events, than to create something de novo (and of course something having art and anime helps your imagination adopt it much easier.)
And that means that in your particular situation, you should have full liberty to ignore what the author says and adopt the narrative that "feels right to you". Concrete example: why do you think fans rejected the ending of Kuma Miko anime, or KF2? There is an intuition that regardless of whether something is "canonicalized", if it goes against the essence of a character then it is simply wrong and must be rejected. In your case it's slightly more difficult to do because it's harder to mentally separate out, but the same should still apply:
Is the character not being "virgin" in any way material to the events of the manga or her personality? If not, it should (in theory) be easy to reject that narrative, especially since it isn't even part of the manga. (In theory this "rejection of canonical narrative" is limited only by your own imaginative powers. In practice, doing so is difficult because your own "alternate narrative" is going to have to compete in your mind with the "canonical narrative". Also the fact that others don't share that narrative implicitly makes it an uphill battle, as your thoughts are highly shaped by consensus).