Before posting keep this in mind; This website is supported by user created content to keep it active.
If users (such as yourself) do not create content, you only have yourselves to blame for the lack of said content.


[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject   (reply to 6322)
Message
BB Code
File
File URL
Embed   Help
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: ASS, BMP, CSS, FLAC, GIF, JPEG, JPG, MP3, OGG, PDF, PNG, PSD, RAR, SWF, TORRENT, TXT, ZIP
  • Maximum file size allowed is 10000 KB.
  • Images greater than 260x260 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 1496 unique user posts.
  • board catalog

File 149458169442.jpg - (367.10KB , 1402x1473 , C_BLRYxVwAAbYP7_jpg large.jpg )
6322 No. 6322 [Edit]
Just wondering, how much does it cost to keep the site up for a year tohno?
>> No. 6324 [Edit]
Round about $140 usd give or take.
>> No. 6465 [Edit]
>>6324
thats a considerable amount. why would you spend all that money and then let /tat/ garbage mar the site's front page?
as the moment the front is like 50% politics argument posts, it detracts substantially from the site's otakuness.
>> No. 6466 [Edit]
>>6465
It might not be ideal but it helps keep things active around here, gives people more to talk about while here.
I think I see where you're getting at though. You're saying that it removes links to other discussions and topics around the site by pushing them off the front page right?
I can certainly see the logic in that, if that's the case. Although to that, wouldn't people check all the recent posts, or take a look at the boards they're interested in?
If to that you'd recommend hiding the board, that would essentially kill the board as it's been hidden for a pretty long time in fact.
If you'd recommend deleting it, well, why delete one of our more active board with posts people seem to put good thought and effort into?
I think the better solution might be to simply compensate for it and try to get other boards more active in turn... which isn't gonna happen lol.
Maybe leaving a link to it but hiding the posts like we do with /ns/ could work... Good thinking anon! I'll get right on that.
>> No. 6467 [Edit]
>>6466
>>6466
My two cents: /tat/ should be for discussions that pertain otakus, hikikomoris and neets... Like analysis and discussions about why the societies shun people from these stereotypes, why they exist, why and how normals can infiltrate it, how to fool people into thinking you're sane, etc.; a place where debates that have no room (or are too sensitive for) in the other boards can take place.

I personally don't mind /tat/ is basically a mini-/pol/, nor that its posts can be seen in the front page's feed... but I think this board not having parameters of topics imho detracts from the overall identity of the site.
>> No. 6468 [Edit]
>>6467
>discussions that pertain otakus, hikikomoris and neets
That's sort of what /ot/ is for though, and to an extent /so/ as well.
The term is tossed around a lot lately but /tat/ is like a containment board. People find it annoying to see arguing or debating on other boards so we have /tat/ for that.
>> No. 6470 [Edit]
>>6465
There have been seven posts in /tat/ over the past week. Fucking seven.

If that's enough to flood the front page we seriously do have low userbase problems now, though I cant blame anyone for leaving at this point. I think you're just that same person thats always talking about /pol/ this, /pol/ that and said Tohno frequented /pol/ or some shit.
>> No. 6473 [Edit]
>>6470
>and said Tohno frequented /pol/ or some shit.
I don't think I've ever posted on that board, I 'might' have skimmed it over once or twice out of curiosity though, but I don't remember too well.
>> No. 6539 [Edit]
>>6470
Yeah, fuck that cunt. I''ve noticed him as well, and he's making Tohno change the site to suit his own personal liking.
>> No. 6540 [Edit]
>>6539
There's been a lot of that going around. Pretty tired of it honestly. Tired of all this shit...
>> No. 6542 [Edit]
It seems liek random pictures are disappearing, such as the last one in the colouring thread on /mai/
>> No. 6543 [Edit]
>>6542
I haven't really noticed that. they all seem to be okay last I looked.

View catalog

Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason  


[Home] [Manage]



[ an / foe / ma / mp3 / vg / vn ] [ cr / fig / navi ] [ $ / mai / mt / ot / so / tat / txt / 日本 ] [ arc / ddl / fb / irc / lh / lol / ns / pic / sub ] [ home ]