>>1390
>is this intended?
No
All I know is, it's becuase /fig/ was made sometime after it broke, sort of.

Do[m][o][spoiler]n[/o][/spoiler][/m]'[o][sub]t[/sub][/o] [sub][b][b]m[/b][/sub][/b][spoiler][sub]i[/sub][/spoiler][sup]

[o][sub]n[/sub][/o]

[/sup]d

[
b] [/b]

m[m]e[/m]

[sub][spoiler] [/sub][/spoiler]

j[m][sub]u[/sub][/m]s[sup]t[/sup][sup][m] [/m][/sup][o][o]t[/o][/o]est[o]i[/o][sub]n[/sub][m]g[/m][o]

[/o][sup][o]t[/o][/sup]h

[o][m][sup]e[/sup][/m][/o]

[spoiler]

[spoiler]b

[/spoiler][/spoiler]b

c

o[sup]d[/sup]e[o][i]!
[/o][/i]

>>1392
I agree.

>>1397
What? Didn't he say "Don't mind me just testing the bbcode!"? How can you agree with that?

>>1421
How can you not?
What lies can you find in that post?

I declare that having
>>1392
>Message too long click here to expand
spoilered is a bug, fixnaoploxkthxbai

When will it be fixed? I want to post very lewd figure pictures on /fig/.

>>1482
I don't have the first clue how to fix it.