Beep Boop Bip
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject   (reply to 1792)
Message
BB Code
File
File URL
Embed   Help
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: BMP, C, CPP, CSS, EPUB, FLAC, FLV, GIF, JPG, OGG, PDF, PNG, PSD, RAR, TORRENT, TXT, WEBM, ZIP
  • Maximum file size allowed is 10000 KB.
  • Images greater than 260x260 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 1064 unique user posts.
  • board catalog
File 15503525325.jpg - (10.14KB , 303x166 , stier.jpg )
1792 No. 1792 [Edit]
Can hubless cycles be the future standard?
Expand all images
>> No. 1796 [Edit]
In what way are they more practical than the alternative?
>> No. 1820 [Edit]
>>1796
Fixating on aesthetics takes less effort than learning to understand functionality
>> No. 1837 [Edit]
I thought this was some sort of joke until I looked up and found https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centreless_wheel

funnily enough what I thought of as a possible disadvantage was listed as one of the first things on the page along with some others.
>> No. 1856 [Edit]
File 156314415936.jpg - (207.38KB , 2000x1125 , 20190721.jpg )
1856
Just buy a e-bike
>> No. 1859 [Edit]
>>1856
Might as well, it's about as useless as a hubless wheel.
>> No. 1861 [Edit]
>>1859
Eh. They seem to have improved a lot in the past ten years. This year I have seen e-bikes on my street going probably 45km/h without pedaling, and apparently the range of them is pretty good nowadays.
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]

View catalog

Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason  


[Home] [Manage]



[ Rules ] [ an / foe / ma / mp3 / vg / vn ] [ cr / fig / navi ] [ mai / ot / so / tat ] [ arc / ddl / irc / lol / ns / pic ] [ home ]