>>
Anonymous
01/28/21(Thu)12:15
No. 73
[Edit ]
>>72
Yes I think that's a large part of what's driving it. It's not entirely the small guys (although they were the initial movers). Remember that apps like Robinhood sell order flow data to large hedgefunds, so they already know where the market is going and can take action accordingly.
>>71
>now have to close their positions
On a long enough time-scale, there are other options they could take. They could declare bankruptcy, or somehow convince GME to issue more shares (diluting stock?). The only reason they'd be forced to close out their shares is if the broker wants the shares back or if the broker thinks the stock isn't going back down and they want the underlying asset back. But since it's ultimately only at the discretion of the broker that they have to close their position, I'm sure that the suits and ties will meet up in some clubroom and work out a deal. If the shorts don't have to pay interest, for instance, they can hold indefinitely without incurring any losses. And then it's a question of who's willing to hold out longer.
Oh apparently just implemented was another strategy I didn't foresee: they convince Robinhood to place restrictions preventing people from buying the stocks. I don't know if something like this has happened before, but it essentially guarantees a price dip (if people can only sell, then the price goes down). So apparently overshorting and placing stock restrictions isn't deemed "market manipulation."Post edited on 28th Jan 2021, 12:30pm