>>
|
No. 23764
[Edit]
>>23763
What I meant was that professional critics are professional because they are above the commoner in their ability to objectively look at entertainment, mostly due to knowledge in the field.
I'm talking film critics that write for papers and stuff, not game reviewers.
To judge something objectively, you would look at things like pacing, directing, writing (not story) etcetera, things that cannot, or to the least possible extent, hold personal bias.
Nobody likes something that is rushed, this would be considered objectively bad. This is because it would be the same across all genres, a horror fan would not like a rushed horror film and a slice-of-life fan would not like a rushed SoL film, the pacing is 'bad', so this is objective.
This is different to 'fast' or 'slow' paced, since some do enjoy fast-pace and some do not, this would be subjective.
That's about as objective as you can get for entertainment, most of it is subjective.
|