>>
|
No. 856
[Edit]
File
129189539052.jpg
- (287.64KB
, 796x1118
, Spoiler Picture.jpg
)
>>854
>Okay, so he has said that ignorant bliss is best.
No, he didn't; what he said is that, given the wandering/failed and wicked nature, both ours and the world's, evassion or delussional/insufficient schemes seem to be the only possible ways for us to be happy. Far from condoning us, he's being the hardest critic of human condition of ignorance and its vicious cheap joy...
>I still rather be free to be happy than indentured to be happy.
And I celebrate it: what a wonderful thing to hear from you, actually. What I couldn't grant myself, is if there's any actual way to achieve that authentic (responsable) hapiness of the free men... i.e. if it's even possible to ever be truly free, good, or aware at all. But, in acordance with your statement, let me reformulate it as from my own point of view: I'd rather be aware (as much as I could) and become miserable out of it, than being delussionally happy...
Now: do I can truly live by those words? I don't know. Mr. Twain, with brave pessimism, seem to think that not likely; but the ethical discorse for he stands on this amazing beautiful book, is far more rich and complex than just this.
|