>>
|
No. 4422
[Edit]
I relate to a lot of the OP post, actually (I'd say you write pretty well for an 11 year old). I'd just like to think I'm a little more visually-minded, but that's flattering myself, I suppose, and I was always at least a little confident about my imagination. I totally get the 'backstories' part. Whenever I was truant from school, I just spent the bus-ride thinking about what I would say to the attendance secretary when she inevitably called me down. Also came up with little stories about what I'd say to 'person X' if they talked to me. They never did, and when they actually did, it never went as planned...Still, I liked that feeling. The whole "slice of life imagination" thing just really resonates with me.
>I always wonder whether it's okay to use real events/people/one's own behavior/routines in fiction.
As a 'writer', I always try and do this. I just interpret the "characters" of my mind as composites of people I used to know. Even if I'm not trying to, it happens. I think it's perfectly fine to do stuff like that. It adds to the realism/believability of the story. If I'm writing about Susie-Perfect (what are those characters called again?), then it seems boring. But if I'm writing about, say, the valedictorian who was, at the same time, a massively boring burn-out, with "human conflicts" (whatever those are, I guess it's just angst) inside, then I'd say I have something close to a decent character. That was a really, really shitty example, but you should get the point. I lost the ability to make up characters when I lost my "fantasy", so I just borrow from the world around me. Snoop Dogg once said "I can’t rap about something I don’t know. You’ll never hear me rapping about no bachelor’s degree. It’s only what I know and that’s that street life. It’s all everyday life, reality". Yeah, I just quoted Snoop Dogg on /tc/. Then again, you all seem to roll with the Wu-Tang, so that might cause some strife. Of course, musically, Wu-Tang are ten times better. My favorite hip-hop icon is B.I.G. all day, though (dude had some crazy flow). But I feel as though that's not to be discussed on /tc/, particularly this thread.
I also re-write parts of my life. That's my greatest shame, probably: It gives me pleasure to re-write the parts that I screwed up. There's an entire compilation of this shit on my computer. Bunch of little stories. Stuff I remember being bad, I just reset and re-write - Ever since I discovered the idea of world-lines (which I 'misinterpreted' as "parallel worlds" until...Steins;Gate). I also have the awful habit of abandoning 'projects' that I start. There are at least five stories that would have been quite lengthy and perhaps even good, if I finished them beyond the first few chapters/paragraphs.
>>4403
>I think "talent" is basically synonymous with "creativity".
Very true. I agree with your post as a whole, man. "Anyone can play guitar", but it takes an actually good guitarist to make something worth listening to.
>>4393
(Massive digression, here)
I grew up/still am poor, and often find myself endowed with huge amounts of free time, so I've had time to really gouge out the local libraries. Monthly, at most, though. I hate 'library guys', you know? A couple of the writers you mentioned really resonated with me through the years - Camus is one of my favorite writers, but I don't really enjoy his novels. His essay collection (The Myth of Sisyphus) is still one of my favorite books of all-time, though. Stuff he says in that book just makes sense to me. Nevertheless, didn't really enjoy any of his novels. They felt too...tight-assed (for lack of a better term) for me, as opposed to his essays, which felt like he was writing straight to the reader, no pretense. It was reminiscent of Dostoevsky, but with Fyo-Do, I understand - That's just his general style/translation issues. Camus, though, had eloquence, and the novels I read by him didn't really show that. Kafka (who I was turned onto, by Camus, as one could assume), on the other hand, is one of those freakishly good writers, who can do what I've always yearned to - Blend fantasy and reality into one awesome mess. 'The Trial' had a few parts that scenes from SZS or FLCL seem to echo, man! Yet, at the same time, it retained a somber, realistic tone. It's craziness. He's easily one of my top five writers. And Camus' book is the perfect companion to his novels. Shit got real after I finished the Kafka chapter, and re-read The Trial. It's like...Camus is the utensils, Kafka is the meal. One affected the way I saw my life, one depicted it as the other saw it.
Christ, that was rambling. Out of breath and everything.
Shorter, fancier version:
I fancy myself a 'writer'. I used to be fantastical and imaginative as a 'writer', but digressed/progressed to realistic and 'poetic' (I guess it could be called that) stuff around the middle of high-school. I enjoy making up stories about stuff that could have been reality, but, for various reasons, aren't. I can't really make up stories on the spot, however, given time, I come up with...boring realistic stuff about characters who are 'bothered' (everyone I met/meet is 'bothered' in one way or another, so that's what I know). My fantastical imagination decayed, but, with that decay, comes a desire to write about the life that I see, and the faint willpower/ability to do so.
I'd like to write a short story or something about a guy who has a waifu and everything, but I don't see how I'd actually amount to such a heavy thing (waifu's are serious business, bro), without really making the protagonist a self-insertion. I mean, I think it's fine if I'm writing stuff that I don't think anyone will ever actually read, but I'd love to share that if I ever actually started/finished it. Ahh, well, screw it. Someone will beat me to it, and they'll do a better job.
|