I like one of the comments there...

>There are millions of people are fans to Manga which has been around for hundreds of years

Hundreds of years?

>>14796
Even Jesus Christ liked manga!

>"A photo depicting a real child could have been used to make the drawing."

How does any sort of court even look at a sentence like this and take it seriously

>>14798
At least she sounds desperate, and even the criminal investigators (in the child porn division) say this is a waste of time. I don't think the guy even needs any more support

Article titled "Pregnant reindeer death shock: 'they all exploded'" caught my attention and I forgot to read yours the first time.

>But according to Hedvig Trost of the prosecution, it can be hard to draw a line between what is an animation and what is a photograph.
>“The ban is there to protect children in general, whether it is real children depicted or not,” she said in court.

This is a sound argument and it's not the least bit strange. Think of the rights of fictional children.

>>14807
>Think of the rights of fictional children.

I don't think they mean it in that way. Its probably saying that people shouldn't sexualise children.

>>14796
Technically he's right.
The Hokusai manga was first published in 1814 but I doubt that that's what he was referring to.

My respect goes even higher for Sweden.

>>15048
why