>>
|
No. 1473
[Edit]
>>1472
Tribal identification is inefficient in globalized industrial society. To that end, Europeans are attacked because their culture is too puristic and they aren't easily assimilated into a massive global population/workforce. It's simply and honestly in my opinion regular old greed. International mega-corporations do not have it in their long term or short term interest to maintain or tolerate a population that doesn't want to cooperate with it or become another segment of the squirming, slaving brown masses.
We live in the delusion that humans behave and form ideas, philosophy, and civilisation because it works well, but the reality is that no human social behavior can be known to have the most optimal results in the long run. Sometimes a system that works well for thousands of years suddenly runs up against a problem it wasn't developed to solve, and it disintegrates under the pressure of it's new environment. I believe that industrial society, or more importantly global economic society, was that obstacle for European civilization. It ended up pitted against groups, largely run by individuals from it's own culture and genetic background, that simply didn't care about loftier ideals like race, culture, religion, etc. and used their acquired economic power to blot out opposition. To that end, European societies are being destroyed simply because they are too costly to maintain. Europeans expect too much of their resources for themselves, and too much autonomy over their own land, and within recent history ( say 30,000 years ) they have been the most opposed to mixing or cooperating with groups outside their own, as is evidenced by their genetic situation. By the way you should read about that kind of thing, Europeans form such an insanely tight cluster on the global scale and are one of only two super-populations to have effectively zero modern mixing.
Although greed may be the wrong idea here. I can't see human society past a certain point as the result of individualistic human ideals, desires, and motivations, like for example "the Jews want to ( personally ) destroy the white race". I see things as a big system sort of deal, where the combined resource needs of many hundreds or thousands or millions of people drive the motions of a machine that ends up taking on it's own unconscious desire for control. No one individual is responsible for this attack, and possibly no one with any real power even truly desires it, although there are growing numbers of anti-whites due to the personal and population wide resentment of a single group seeming to dominate, or thrive when they did not. I honestly think colonisation was a mistake, in the nature in which it happened. Too much contact in too little time to control, Europe should have been unified into a solid and coherent block before it tackled the rest of the world. The result was a series of weaker tendrils that ultimately lost power, and allowed the entire world to catch up with Europe and worst of all start demanding from it. When Europeans started to decline in reproduction it was the death knell, because with no monolithic goal organisations were free to simply do as they pleased and bring in anyone, whenever they wanted, if it was cheaper than providing employment to Europeans, whose rising standards of living ironically doomed themselves to being obsolete as a workforce. I personally, with foresight, would have to say that if you wanted your own race to survive unmixed into the space age, you would have to destroy everyone else you met on the planet before settling down again. Because given enough time the average person will simply fuck what they want. You cannot rely on the plans of individuals if they require constant and very long term maintenance. It has to be something that has a definite endpoint after which the effects are permanent by their nature.
Ultimately I just don't believe the core of these groups now attacking whites/europeans are Jews, not on the grand scale at least. It could be anyone human. They probably don't even have a unified goal or desire. They are just driven by the simple instincts of any human being who has found themselves in a position outside the experience of normal human life, and probably don't even view the average person as being the same as them anymore. I would guess the greater movement in this direction isn't even planned by just a natural reaction like "hey, I was trying to consolidate my control of global resources and this particular group of people were throwing a wrench in my gears, so I used some weedkiller on the aspects of it that pushed back against me and made it suitable to be used by my machine". The way you'd deal with a flat tire by throwing it out and putting a new one in its place. In that sense they might see that a white population is too resistant to changing to suit its needs, so they throw in a bunch of propaganda, restrictions, and educational poison to clean them out and stop their disruption of the attempt to assimilate that particular country into their assets. Like burning a diseased crop, I think that's honestly how they might see this if you had to make a comparison.
It's just how I've come to see things after spending several years studying history.
|